医院专业护理机构的存活率:组织和市场层面的预测因素。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Care Management Review Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000411
Shivani Gupta, Ferhat D Zengul, Justin Blackburn, Larry R Hearld, Rita Jablonski, Bisakha Sen, Robert Weech-Maldonado
{"title":"医院专业护理机构的存活率:组织和市场层面的预测因素。","authors":"Shivani Gupta, Ferhat D Zengul, Justin Blackburn, Larry R Hearld, Rita Jablonski, Bisakha Sen, Robert Weech-Maldonado","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rising health care costs and consequent increases in Medicare reimbursements have led to many payment reforms over the years. Implementation of the prospective payment system (PPS) for hospitals in 1983 incentivized hospitals to either purchase skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) or utilize their excess capacity to establish one within the hospital. With PPS reimbursement being applied to SNFs in 1998, prior monetary incentives for hospitals to own an SNF disappeared. However, despite the reduction in numbers, many hospitals continued to operate their hospital-based skilled nursing facilities (HBSNFs).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines the organizational and market-level factors associated with the survival of HBSNFs using the population ecology of organizations framework.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Using American Hospital Association survey data, event histories of all U.S. acute care hospitals with an open HBSNF in 1998 were plotted to examine if a hospital closed its HBSNF during a 22-year period (1998-2020). The primary independent variables included hospital size, ownership, total margin, market competition, and Medicare Advantage penetration. The independent and control variables were lagged by 1 year. Cox regressions were conducted to estimate the hazard ratios capturing the risk of HBSNF closure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that HBSNFs located in large, not-for-profit hospitals and those operating in less competitive markets had greater odds of surviving.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>The HBSNF administrators of small, for-profit hospitals and those operating in highly competitive markets could utilize the findings of this study to judiciously allocate slack resources to their HBSNFs to keep those open given the current emphasis on continuity of care by regulatory bodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital-based skilled nursing facility survival: Organizational and market-level predictors.\",\"authors\":\"Shivani Gupta, Ferhat D Zengul, Justin Blackburn, Larry R Hearld, Rita Jablonski, Bisakha Sen, Robert Weech-Maldonado\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rising health care costs and consequent increases in Medicare reimbursements have led to many payment reforms over the years. Implementation of the prospective payment system (PPS) for hospitals in 1983 incentivized hospitals to either purchase skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) or utilize their excess capacity to establish one within the hospital. With PPS reimbursement being applied to SNFs in 1998, prior monetary incentives for hospitals to own an SNF disappeared. However, despite the reduction in numbers, many hospitals continued to operate their hospital-based skilled nursing facilities (HBSNFs).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines the organizational and market-level factors associated with the survival of HBSNFs using the population ecology of organizations framework.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Using American Hospital Association survey data, event histories of all U.S. acute care hospitals with an open HBSNF in 1998 were plotted to examine if a hospital closed its HBSNF during a 22-year period (1998-2020). The primary independent variables included hospital size, ownership, total margin, market competition, and Medicare Advantage penetration. The independent and control variables were lagged by 1 year. Cox regressions were conducted to estimate the hazard ratios capturing the risk of HBSNF closure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that HBSNFs located in large, not-for-profit hospitals and those operating in less competitive markets had greater odds of surviving.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>The HBSNF administrators of small, for-profit hospitals and those operating in highly competitive markets could utilize the findings of this study to judiciously allocate slack resources to their HBSNFs to keep those open given the current emphasis on continuity of care by regulatory bodies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000411\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多年来,医疗成本的不断上涨以及随之而来的医疗保险报销额度的增加导致了许多支付方式的改革。1983 年对医院实施的预期支付系统(PPS)激励医院购买专业护理设施(SNF)或利用其过剩能力在医院内建立专业护理设施。随着 1998 年对专业护理机构实施 PPS 补偿,之前鼓励医院拥有专业护理机构的货币激励机制消失了。目的:本研究采用人口组织生态学框架,探讨了与 HBSNFs 生存相关的组织和市场因素:利用美国医院协会的调查数据,绘制了 1998 年所有开放式 HBSNF 的美国急症护理医院的事件历史,以研究在 22 年内(1998-2020 年)是否有医院关闭其 HBSNF。主要自变量包括医院规模、所有权、总利润率、市场竞争和医疗保险优势渗透率。自变量和控制变量滞后一年。通过 Cox 回归来估算 HBSNF 倒闭风险的危险比:结果显示,位于大型非营利性医院的 HBSNF 和那些在竞争较少的市场中运营的 HBSNF 有更大的生存几率:实践意义:鉴于监管机构目前对医疗服务连续性的重视,小型非营利性医院和市场竞争激烈的医院的 HBSNF 管理者可以利用本研究的结果,明智地将闲置资源分配给其 HBSNF,以保持 HBSNF 的正常运营。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hospital-based skilled nursing facility survival: Organizational and market-level predictors.

Background: Rising health care costs and consequent increases in Medicare reimbursements have led to many payment reforms over the years. Implementation of the prospective payment system (PPS) for hospitals in 1983 incentivized hospitals to either purchase skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) or utilize their excess capacity to establish one within the hospital. With PPS reimbursement being applied to SNFs in 1998, prior monetary incentives for hospitals to own an SNF disappeared. However, despite the reduction in numbers, many hospitals continued to operate their hospital-based skilled nursing facilities (HBSNFs).

Purpose: This study examines the organizational and market-level factors associated with the survival of HBSNFs using the population ecology of organizations framework.

Methodology: Using American Hospital Association survey data, event histories of all U.S. acute care hospitals with an open HBSNF in 1998 were plotted to examine if a hospital closed its HBSNF during a 22-year period (1998-2020). The primary independent variables included hospital size, ownership, total margin, market competition, and Medicare Advantage penetration. The independent and control variables were lagged by 1 year. Cox regressions were conducted to estimate the hazard ratios capturing the risk of HBSNF closure.

Results: The results showed that HBSNFs located in large, not-for-profit hospitals and those operating in less competitive markets had greater odds of surviving.

Practice implications: The HBSNF administrators of small, for-profit hospitals and those operating in highly competitive markets could utilize the findings of this study to judiciously allocate slack resources to their HBSNFs to keep those open given the current emphasis on continuity of care by regulatory bodies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
期刊最新文献
Health care management and the patient experience. Stanford Network for Advancement and Promotion: The impact of a community building-focused leadership development program on the success of underrepresented groups in academic medicine. Exploring barriers to employee voice among certified nursing assistants: A qualitative study. Good therapeutic connections and patient psychological safety: A qualitative survey study. Validating perceptions with clinical measures: A latent growth curve on the associations between patient experience and hospital-associated infections in Norway over time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1