帕金森病患者认知能力下降风险分析:从 PPMI 和 ICICLE-PD 数据中获得的启示。

IF 4 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-08-05 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1002/dad2.12625
Dana Pourzinal, Rachael A Lawson, Alison J Yarnall, Caroline H Williams-Gray, Roger A Barker, Jihyun Yang, Katie L McMahon, John D O'Sullivan, Gerard J Byrne, Nadeeka N Dissanayaka
{"title":"帕金森病患者认知能力下降风险分析:从 PPMI 和 ICICLE-PD 数据中获得的启示。","authors":"Dana Pourzinal, Rachael A Lawson, Alison J Yarnall, Caroline H Williams-Gray, Roger A Barker, Jihyun Yang, Katie L McMahon, John D O'Sullivan, Gerard J Byrne, Nadeeka N Dissanayaka","doi":"10.1002/dad2.12625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A subset of people with Parkinson's disease (PD) develop dementia faster than others. We aimed to profile PD cognitive subtypes at risk of dementia based on their rate of cognitive decline.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Latent class mixed models stratified subtypes in Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) (<i>N </i>= 770) and ICICLE-PD (<i>N </i>= 212) datasets based on their decline in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment over at least 4 years. Baseline demographic and cognitive data at diagnosis were compared between subtypes to determine their clinical profile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four subtypes were identified: two with stable cognition, one with steady decline, and one with rapid decline. Performance on Judgement of Line Orientation, but not category fluency, was associated with a steady decline in the PPMI dataset, and deficits in category fluency, but not visuospatial function, were associated with a steady decline in the ICICLE-PD dataset.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>People with PD susceptible to cognitive decline demonstrate unique clinical profiles at diagnosis, although this differed between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Four cognitive subtypes were revealed in two Parkinson's disease samples.Unique profiles of cognitive impairment were related to cognitive decline.Judgement of Line Orientation/category fluency predictive of steady decline.Global deficits related to rapid cognitive decline and increased dementia risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":53226,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","volume":"16 3","pages":"e12625"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profiling people with Parkinson's disease at risk of cognitive decline: Insights from PPMI and ICICLE-PD data.\",\"authors\":\"Dana Pourzinal, Rachael A Lawson, Alison J Yarnall, Caroline H Williams-Gray, Roger A Barker, Jihyun Yang, Katie L McMahon, John D O'Sullivan, Gerard J Byrne, Nadeeka N Dissanayaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dad2.12625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A subset of people with Parkinson's disease (PD) develop dementia faster than others. We aimed to profile PD cognitive subtypes at risk of dementia based on their rate of cognitive decline.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Latent class mixed models stratified subtypes in Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) (<i>N </i>= 770) and ICICLE-PD (<i>N </i>= 212) datasets based on their decline in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment over at least 4 years. Baseline demographic and cognitive data at diagnosis were compared between subtypes to determine their clinical profile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four subtypes were identified: two with stable cognition, one with steady decline, and one with rapid decline. Performance on Judgement of Line Orientation, but not category fluency, was associated with a steady decline in the PPMI dataset, and deficits in category fluency, but not visuospatial function, were associated with a steady decline in the ICICLE-PD dataset.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>People with PD susceptible to cognitive decline demonstrate unique clinical profiles at diagnosis, although this differed between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Four cognitive subtypes were revealed in two Parkinson's disease samples.Unique profiles of cognitive impairment were related to cognitive decline.Judgement of Line Orientation/category fluency predictive of steady decline.Global deficits related to rapid cognitive decline and increased dementia risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"e12625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299072/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:帕金森病(Parkinson's disease,PD)患者中的一部分人比其他人更快患上痴呆症。我们的目的是根据帕金森病患者认知能力下降的速度,对有痴呆风险的帕金森病认知亚型进行分析:潜类混合模型根据患者在蒙特利尔认知评估(Montreal Cognitive Assessment)中至少4年的衰退情况,对帕金森病进展标志物倡议(PPMI)(N = 770)和ICICLE-PD(N = 212)数据集中的亚型进行分层。对不同亚型患者诊断时的人口统计学基线和认知数据进行比较,以确定其临床特征:结果:确定了四个亚型:两个认知能力稳定,一个稳步下降,一个快速下降。在PPMI数据集中,线方向判断的表现(而非类别流畅性)与持续下降有关;在ICICLE-PD数据集中,类别流畅性的缺陷(而非视觉空间功能)与持续下降有关:讨论:容易出现认知功能下降的帕金森病患者在确诊时会表现出独特的临床特征,尽管不同组群之间存在差异:在两个帕金森病样本中发现了四种认知亚型。认知障碍的独特特征与认知能力下降有关。线性定向判断/分类流畅性预测能力持续下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Profiling people with Parkinson's disease at risk of cognitive decline: Insights from PPMI and ICICLE-PD data.

Introduction: A subset of people with Parkinson's disease (PD) develop dementia faster than others. We aimed to profile PD cognitive subtypes at risk of dementia based on their rate of cognitive decline.

Method: Latent class mixed models stratified subtypes in Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) (= 770) and ICICLE-PD (= 212) datasets based on their decline in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment over at least 4 years. Baseline demographic and cognitive data at diagnosis were compared between subtypes to determine their clinical profile.

Results: Four subtypes were identified: two with stable cognition, one with steady decline, and one with rapid decline. Performance on Judgement of Line Orientation, but not category fluency, was associated with a steady decline in the PPMI dataset, and deficits in category fluency, but not visuospatial function, were associated with a steady decline in the ICICLE-PD dataset.

Discussion: People with PD susceptible to cognitive decline demonstrate unique clinical profiles at diagnosis, although this differed between cohorts.

Highlights: Four cognitive subtypes were revealed in two Parkinson's disease samples.Unique profiles of cognitive impairment were related to cognitive decline.Judgement of Line Orientation/category fluency predictive of steady decline.Global deficits related to rapid cognitive decline and increased dementia risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
7.50%
发文量
101
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring (DADM) is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal from the Alzheimer''s Association® that will publish new research that reports the discovery, development and validation of instruments, technologies, algorithms, and innovative processes. Papers will cover a range of topics interested in the early and accurate detection of individuals with memory complaints and/or among asymptomatic individuals at elevated risk for various forms of memory disorders. The expectation for published papers will be to translate fundamental knowledge about the neurobiology of the disease into practical reports that describe both the conceptual and methodological aspects of the submitted scientific inquiry. Published topics will explore the development of biomarkers, surrogate markers, and conceptual/methodological challenges. Publication priority will be given to papers that 1) describe putative surrogate markers that accurately track disease progression, 2) biomarkers that fulfill international regulatory requirements, 3) reports from large, well-characterized population-based cohorts that comprise the heterogeneity and diversity of asymptomatic individuals and 4) algorithmic development that considers multi-marker arrays (e.g., integrated-omics, genetics, biofluids, imaging, etc.) and advanced computational analytics and technologies.
期刊最新文献
Everyday functioning as a predictor of cognitive status in a group of community-dwelling, predominantly Black adults. Elevated tau in the piriform cortex in Alzheimer's but not Parkinson's disease using PET-MR. A data-driven, multi-domain brain gray matter signature as a powerful biomarker associated with several clinical outcomes. Association of a pace of aging epigenetic clock with rate of cognitive decline in the Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort. Association of circulating ketone bodies with cognitive performance and dementia in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1