鼻源性头痛的向心性内窥镜鼻窦手术。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY American Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104473
{"title":"鼻源性头痛的向心性内窥镜鼻窦手术。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this manuscript is to analyse a diagnostic protocol to select correctly patients with Rhinogenic Headache Contact Point (RH) and to investigate the effect of surgical treatment and medical therapy in pain relief.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective no-randomized study selected adult patients with headache and nasal alteration at CT exam or endoscopic vision with positive response to test with nasal spray with corticosteroids and antihistamine or/and local anesthesia test to the contact points. MIDAS score, intensity score, daily duration of symptoms, frequency of headache in the last month were collected in patients who performed surgery and in patients who performed medical therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Following the inclusion, 415 patients were selected for this study. 302 patients performed nasal surgery (septoplasty, turbinoplasty and/or endoscopic surgery with centripetal technique), 113 performed medical therapy. There was a statistically significant improvement in MIDAS score, intensity score, daily duration of symptoms, frequency of headache in the last month in patients who performed surgery and in patients who performed medical therapy. Regarding the comparison between patients who performed surgery (Group A) and patients who performed only medical therapy for RH (Group B), better outcomes were obtained by Group A. Considering the daily life handicap index, the lowest handicap was obtained in Group A.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates that surgery, using in some cases centripetal technique, gives an improvement statistically significant than medical therapy in RH. The use of nasal spray with corticosteroids and with anti-histamine is a good method in the diagnosis of RH, especially in patients with anatomical variants such as concha bullosa, agger nasi cells and Haller cells.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Centripetal endoscopic sinus surgery in rhinogenic headache\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of this manuscript is to analyse a diagnostic protocol to select correctly patients with Rhinogenic Headache Contact Point (RH) and to investigate the effect of surgical treatment and medical therapy in pain relief.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective no-randomized study selected adult patients with headache and nasal alteration at CT exam or endoscopic vision with positive response to test with nasal spray with corticosteroids and antihistamine or/and local anesthesia test to the contact points. MIDAS score, intensity score, daily duration of symptoms, frequency of headache in the last month were collected in patients who performed surgery and in patients who performed medical therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Following the inclusion, 415 patients were selected for this study. 302 patients performed nasal surgery (septoplasty, turbinoplasty and/or endoscopic surgery with centripetal technique), 113 performed medical therapy. There was a statistically significant improvement in MIDAS score, intensity score, daily duration of symptoms, frequency of headache in the last month in patients who performed surgery and in patients who performed medical therapy. Regarding the comparison between patients who performed surgery (Group A) and patients who performed only medical therapy for RH (Group B), better outcomes were obtained by Group A. Considering the daily life handicap index, the lowest handicap was obtained in Group A.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates that surgery, using in some cases centripetal technique, gives an improvement statistically significant than medical therapy in RH. The use of nasal spray with corticosteroids and with anti-histamine is a good method in the diagnosis of RH, especially in patients with anatomical variants such as concha bullosa, agger nasi cells and Haller cells.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019607092400259X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019607092400259X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文旨在分析正确选择鼻源性头痛接触点(RH)患者的诊断方案,并研究手术治疗和药物治疗对缓解疼痛的效果:本文旨在分析正确选择鼻源性头痛接触点(RH)患者的诊断方案,并研究手术治疗和药物治疗在缓解疼痛方面的效果:方法:一项前瞻性非随机研究选择了在CT检查或内窥镜检查中发现头痛和鼻腔改变,且对鼻腔喷洒皮质类固醇和抗组胺药或/和接触点局部麻醉试验反应阳性的成年患者。收集了手术患者和药物治疗患者的 MIDAS 评分、强度评分、每日症状持续时间、上个月头痛频率:经过筛选,415 名患者被纳入本研究。302名患者接受了鼻腔手术(鼻中隔成形术、鼻甲成形术和/或采用向心性技术的内窥镜手术),113名患者接受了药物治疗。接受手术和药物治疗的患者在 MIDAS 评分、强度评分、每日症状持续时间、最近一个月的头痛频率等方面均有明显改善。在进行手术治疗的患者(A 组)和只进行 RH 药物治疗的患者(B 组)之间进行比较,A 组取得了更好的治疗效果:本研究表明,在某些情况下,使用向心技术进行手术治疗 RH,在统计学上比药物治疗有显著改善。使用含皮质类固醇和抗组胺药物的鼻喷雾剂是诊断 RH 的好方法,尤其是对有解剖变异的患者,如牛皮状圆锥角膜、agger nasi 细胞和 Haller 细胞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Centripetal endoscopic sinus surgery in rhinogenic headache

Objectives

The aim of this manuscript is to analyse a diagnostic protocol to select correctly patients with Rhinogenic Headache Contact Point (RH) and to investigate the effect of surgical treatment and medical therapy in pain relief.

Methods

A prospective no-randomized study selected adult patients with headache and nasal alteration at CT exam or endoscopic vision with positive response to test with nasal spray with corticosteroids and antihistamine or/and local anesthesia test to the contact points. MIDAS score, intensity score, daily duration of symptoms, frequency of headache in the last month were collected in patients who performed surgery and in patients who performed medical therapy.

Results

Following the inclusion, 415 patients were selected for this study. 302 patients performed nasal surgery (septoplasty, turbinoplasty and/or endoscopic surgery with centripetal technique), 113 performed medical therapy. There was a statistically significant improvement in MIDAS score, intensity score, daily duration of symptoms, frequency of headache in the last month in patients who performed surgery and in patients who performed medical therapy. Regarding the comparison between patients who performed surgery (Group A) and patients who performed only medical therapy for RH (Group B), better outcomes were obtained by Group A. Considering the daily life handicap index, the lowest handicap was obtained in Group A.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that surgery, using in some cases centripetal technique, gives an improvement statistically significant than medical therapy in RH. The use of nasal spray with corticosteroids and with anti-histamine is a good method in the diagnosis of RH, especially in patients with anatomical variants such as concha bullosa, agger nasi cells and Haller cells.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
期刊最新文献
Neurogenic cough: A commentary on the step-up approach and therapeutic considerations A national survey of otolaryngologists' perspectives on uses and barriers to palliative care. Transoral non-robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma Improving readability and comprehension levels of otolaryngology patient education materials using ChatGPT Analysis of head and eye dynamic may explain saccades in dizzy patients with normal VOR gain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1