农村门诊胆囊切除术结果的差异。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115852
{"title":"农村门诊胆囊切除术结果的差异。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Previous studies showed comparable outcomes for common in-patient general surgery operations, but it is unknown if this extends to outpatient operations. Our aim was to compare outpatient cholecystectomy outcomes between rural and urban hospitals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort analysis was done using the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample for patients 20-years-and-older undergoing cholecystectomy between 2016 and 2018 ​at rural and urban hospitals. Survey-weighted multivariable regression analysis was performed with primary outcomes including use-of-laparoscopy, complications, and patient discharge disposition.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The most common indication for operation was cholecystitis in both hospital settings. On multivariable analysis, rural hospitals were associated with higher transfers to short-term hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.40, 95%CI 1.61-3.58, p ​&lt; ​0.01) and complications (aOR 1.39, 95%CI 1.11-1.75, p ​&lt; ​0.01). No difference was detected with laparoscopy (aOR 1.93, 95%CI 0.73-5.13, p ​= ​0.19), routine discharge (aOR 1.50, 95%C I0.91-2.45, p ​= ​0.11), or mortality (aOR 3.23, 95%CI 0.10–100.0, p ​= ​0.51).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients cared for at rural hospitals were more likely to be transferred to short-term hospitals and have higher complications. No differences were detected in laparoscopy, routine discharge or mortality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in outpatient rural cholecystectomy outcomes\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Previous studies showed comparable outcomes for common in-patient general surgery operations, but it is unknown if this extends to outpatient operations. Our aim was to compare outpatient cholecystectomy outcomes between rural and urban hospitals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective cohort analysis was done using the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample for patients 20-years-and-older undergoing cholecystectomy between 2016 and 2018 ​at rural and urban hospitals. Survey-weighted multivariable regression analysis was performed with primary outcomes including use-of-laparoscopy, complications, and patient discharge disposition.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The most common indication for operation was cholecystitis in both hospital settings. On multivariable analysis, rural hospitals were associated with higher transfers to short-term hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.40, 95%CI 1.61-3.58, p ​&lt; ​0.01) and complications (aOR 1.39, 95%CI 1.11-1.75, p ​&lt; ​0.01). No difference was detected with laparoscopy (aOR 1.93, 95%CI 0.73-5.13, p ​= ​0.19), routine discharge (aOR 1.50, 95%C I0.91-2.45, p ​= ​0.11), or mortality (aOR 3.23, 95%CI 0.10–100.0, p ​= ​0.51).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients cared for at rural hospitals were more likely to be transferred to short-term hospitals and have higher complications. No differences were detected in laparoscopy, routine discharge or mortality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024004045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024004045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以往的研究显示,普通外科住院手术的疗效具有可比性,但门诊手术的疗效是否也具有可比性还不得而知。我们的目的是比较农村医院和城市医院门诊胆囊切除术的疗效:利用全国非卧床手术样本对2016年至2018年期间在农村和城市医院接受胆囊切除术的20岁及以上患者进行了回顾性队列分析。结果显示,最常见的手术指征是胆囊切除术:两家医院最常见的手术指征都是胆囊炎。在多变量分析中,农村医院与较高的短期转院率相关(调整赔率[aOR]2.40,95%CI 1.61-3.58,P 结论:在农村医院接受治疗的患者的并发症发生率较高:在农村医院接受治疗的患者更有可能转到短期医院,并发症也更多。在腹腔镜检查、常规出院或死亡率方面没有发现差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disparities in outpatient rural cholecystectomy outcomes

Background

Previous studies showed comparable outcomes for common in-patient general surgery operations, but it is unknown if this extends to outpatient operations. Our aim was to compare outpatient cholecystectomy outcomes between rural and urban hospitals.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was done using the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample for patients 20-years-and-older undergoing cholecystectomy between 2016 and 2018 ​at rural and urban hospitals. Survey-weighted multivariable regression analysis was performed with primary outcomes including use-of-laparoscopy, complications, and patient discharge disposition.

Results

The most common indication for operation was cholecystitis in both hospital settings. On multivariable analysis, rural hospitals were associated with higher transfers to short-term hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.40, 95%CI 1.61-3.58, p ​< ​0.01) and complications (aOR 1.39, 95%CI 1.11-1.75, p ​< ​0.01). No difference was detected with laparoscopy (aOR 1.93, 95%CI 0.73-5.13, p ​= ​0.19), routine discharge (aOR 1.50, 95%C I0.91-2.45, p ​= ​0.11), or mortality (aOR 3.23, 95%CI 0.10–100.0, p ​= ​0.51).

Conclusions

Patients cared for at rural hospitals were more likely to be transferred to short-term hospitals and have higher complications. No differences were detected in laparoscopy, routine discharge or mortality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of ERAS protocol adherence and postoperative outcomes after major colorectal surgery in a community hospital. National trends and costs of same day discharge in patients undergoing elective minimally invasive colectomy. Variation in PTH levels and kinetics after parathyroidectomy Time is money: The return on investment of research in surgical training AJS virtual research mentor: Tips on writing an abstract for a conference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1