日本慢性血液透析患者血清碱性磷酸酶水平两种测量方法的比较:ABO血型系统的参与及与死亡风险的关系。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1007/s10157-024-02540-4
Nobuo Nagano, Ayaka Tagahara, Takahito Shimada, Masaaki Miya, Noriko Tamei, Shigeaki Muto, Takaaki Tsutsui, Daiki Saito, Shusaku Itami, Tetsuya Ogawa, Kyoko Ito
{"title":"日本慢性血液透析患者血清碱性磷酸酶水平两种测量方法的比较:ABO血型系统的参与及与死亡风险的关系。","authors":"Nobuo Nagano, Ayaka Tagahara, Takahito Shimada, Masaaki Miya, Noriko Tamei, Shigeaki Muto, Takaaki Tsutsui, Daiki Saito, Shusaku Itami, Tetsuya Ogawa, Kyoko Ito","doi":"10.1007/s10157-024-02540-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels are a risk factor for all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients. Traditionally in Japan, ALP measurements were conducted using the JSCC method, which yields higher ALP measurement values than the IFCC method, mainly due to its increased sensitivity to intestinal ALP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum total ALP levels before and after switching the assay method from JSCC to IFCC were compared among different blood types in 521 hemodialysis patients (Study 1). The association between ALP levels measured by the JSCC method and 7-year mortality was analyzed, including blood types and liver function parameters as covariates, in 510 hemodialysis patients (Study 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ALP levels measured by the JSCC method were approximately three times higher than those measured by the IFCC method, with significant elevation in patients with blood types B and O compared to those with blood types A and AB. Similarly, ALP levels measured by the IFCC method were significantly higher in patients with blood types B and O compared to those with blood types A and AB (Study 1). The highest tertile of ALP levels showed a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, even after adjusting for patient background. However, this significance disappeared when serum liver function-related or inflammatory markers were included as covariates (Study 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ALP levels measured by the JSCC method are associated with life prognosis, but caution should be exercised due to their elevation in patients with blood types B and O and in those with hepatic dysfunction or inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of serum alkaline phosphatase levels between two measurement methods in chronic hemodialysis patients in Japan: involvement of ABO blood group system and relationship with mortality risk.\",\"authors\":\"Nobuo Nagano, Ayaka Tagahara, Takahito Shimada, Masaaki Miya, Noriko Tamei, Shigeaki Muto, Takaaki Tsutsui, Daiki Saito, Shusaku Itami, Tetsuya Ogawa, Kyoko Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10157-024-02540-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels are a risk factor for all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients. Traditionally in Japan, ALP measurements were conducted using the JSCC method, which yields higher ALP measurement values than the IFCC method, mainly due to its increased sensitivity to intestinal ALP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum total ALP levels before and after switching the assay method from JSCC to IFCC were compared among different blood types in 521 hemodialysis patients (Study 1). The association between ALP levels measured by the JSCC method and 7-year mortality was analyzed, including blood types and liver function parameters as covariates, in 510 hemodialysis patients (Study 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ALP levels measured by the JSCC method were approximately three times higher than those measured by the IFCC method, with significant elevation in patients with blood types B and O compared to those with blood types A and AB. Similarly, ALP levels measured by the IFCC method were significantly higher in patients with blood types B and O compared to those with blood types A and AB (Study 1). The highest tertile of ALP levels showed a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, even after adjusting for patient background. However, this significance disappeared when serum liver function-related or inflammatory markers were included as covariates (Study 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ALP levels measured by the JSCC method are associated with life prognosis, but caution should be exercised due to their elevation in patients with blood types B and O and in those with hepatic dysfunction or inflammation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02540-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02540-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血清碱性磷酸酶(ALP)水平升高是血液透析患者全因死亡率的一个危险因素。日本传统上使用 JSCC 方法测量 ALP,该方法得出的 ALP 测量值高于 IFCC 方法,主要是因为其对肠道 ALP 的敏感性更高:方法:比较了 521 名血液透析患者血清总 ALP 水平从 JSCC 法改为 IFCC 法前后的差异(研究 1)。在将血型和肝功能参数作为协变量的情况下,分析了 510 名血液透析患者用 JSCC 方法测定的 ALP 水平与 7 年死亡率之间的关系(研究 2):结果:JSCC法测定的ALP水平比IFCC法测定的ALP水平高出约三倍,B型和O型血患者的ALP水平比A型和AB型血患者显著升高。同样,与 A 型血和 AB 型血相比,用 IFCC 方法测量的 B 型血和 O 型血患者的 ALP 水平也明显较高(研究 1)。即使在调整了患者背景后,ALP水平的最高三分位数仍显示全因死亡风险显著增加。然而,如果将血清肝功能相关指标或炎症指标作为协变量,这种显著性就会消失(研究 2):结论:JSCC法测定的ALP水平与预后相关,但由于B型和O型血患者以及肝功能异常或炎症患者的ALP水平升高,因此应谨慎对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of serum alkaline phosphatase levels between two measurement methods in chronic hemodialysis patients in Japan: involvement of ABO blood group system and relationship with mortality risk.

Background: Elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels are a risk factor for all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients. Traditionally in Japan, ALP measurements were conducted using the JSCC method, which yields higher ALP measurement values than the IFCC method, mainly due to its increased sensitivity to intestinal ALP.

Methods: Serum total ALP levels before and after switching the assay method from JSCC to IFCC were compared among different blood types in 521 hemodialysis patients (Study 1). The association between ALP levels measured by the JSCC method and 7-year mortality was analyzed, including blood types and liver function parameters as covariates, in 510 hemodialysis patients (Study 2).

Results: ALP levels measured by the JSCC method were approximately three times higher than those measured by the IFCC method, with significant elevation in patients with blood types B and O compared to those with blood types A and AB. Similarly, ALP levels measured by the IFCC method were significantly higher in patients with blood types B and O compared to those with blood types A and AB (Study 1). The highest tertile of ALP levels showed a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, even after adjusting for patient background. However, this significance disappeared when serum liver function-related or inflammatory markers were included as covariates (Study 2).

Conclusion: ALP levels measured by the JSCC method are associated with life prognosis, but caution should be exercised due to their elevation in patients with blood types B and O and in those with hepatic dysfunction or inflammation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.
期刊最新文献
Clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis with refractory peritonitis: significance of the day 5 cell count. Estimating the prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the older population using health screening data in Japan. Predictors of encapsulated peritoneal sclerosis in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis using neutral-pH dialysate. Utility of ultrasound in measuring quadriceps muscle thickness in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Annual change in eGFR in renal hypouricemia: a retrospective pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1