{"title":"日本慢性血液透析患者血清碱性磷酸酶水平两种测量方法的比较:ABO血型系统的参与及与死亡风险的关系。","authors":"Nobuo Nagano, Ayaka Tagahara, Takahito Shimada, Masaaki Miya, Noriko Tamei, Shigeaki Muto, Takaaki Tsutsui, Daiki Saito, Shusaku Itami, Tetsuya Ogawa, Kyoko Ito","doi":"10.1007/s10157-024-02540-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels are a risk factor for all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients. Traditionally in Japan, ALP measurements were conducted using the JSCC method, which yields higher ALP measurement values than the IFCC method, mainly due to its increased sensitivity to intestinal ALP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum total ALP levels before and after switching the assay method from JSCC to IFCC were compared among different blood types in 521 hemodialysis patients (Study 1). The association between ALP levels measured by the JSCC method and 7-year mortality was analyzed, including blood types and liver function parameters as covariates, in 510 hemodialysis patients (Study 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ALP levels measured by the JSCC method were approximately three times higher than those measured by the IFCC method, with significant elevation in patients with blood types B and O compared to those with blood types A and AB. Similarly, ALP levels measured by the IFCC method were significantly higher in patients with blood types B and O compared to those with blood types A and AB (Study 1). The highest tertile of ALP levels showed a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, even after adjusting for patient background. However, this significance disappeared when serum liver function-related or inflammatory markers were included as covariates (Study 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ALP levels measured by the JSCC method are associated with life prognosis, but caution should be exercised due to their elevation in patients with blood types B and O and in those with hepatic dysfunction or inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1300-1310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of serum alkaline phosphatase levels between two measurement methods in chronic hemodialysis patients in Japan: involvement of ABO blood group system and relationship with mortality risk.\",\"authors\":\"Nobuo Nagano, Ayaka Tagahara, Takahito Shimada, Masaaki Miya, Noriko Tamei, Shigeaki Muto, Takaaki Tsutsui, Daiki Saito, Shusaku Itami, Tetsuya Ogawa, Kyoko Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10157-024-02540-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels are a risk factor for all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients. Traditionally in Japan, ALP measurements were conducted using the JSCC method, which yields higher ALP measurement values than the IFCC method, mainly due to its increased sensitivity to intestinal ALP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum total ALP levels before and after switching the assay method from JSCC to IFCC were compared among different blood types in 521 hemodialysis patients (Study 1). The association between ALP levels measured by the JSCC method and 7-year mortality was analyzed, including blood types and liver function parameters as covariates, in 510 hemodialysis patients (Study 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ALP levels measured by the JSCC method were approximately three times higher than those measured by the IFCC method, with significant elevation in patients with blood types B and O compared to those with blood types A and AB. Similarly, ALP levels measured by the IFCC method were significantly higher in patients with blood types B and O compared to those with blood types A and AB (Study 1). The highest tertile of ALP levels showed a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, even after adjusting for patient background. However, this significance disappeared when serum liver function-related or inflammatory markers were included as covariates (Study 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ALP levels measured by the JSCC method are associated with life prognosis, but caution should be exercised due to their elevation in patients with blood types B and O and in those with hepatic dysfunction or inflammation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1300-1310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02540-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-024-02540-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:血清碱性磷酸酶(ALP)水平升高是血液透析患者全因死亡率的一个危险因素。日本传统上使用 JSCC 方法测量 ALP,该方法得出的 ALP 测量值高于 IFCC 方法,主要是因为其对肠道 ALP 的敏感性更高:方法:比较了 521 名血液透析患者血清总 ALP 水平从 JSCC 法改为 IFCC 法前后的差异(研究 1)。在将血型和肝功能参数作为协变量的情况下,分析了 510 名血液透析患者用 JSCC 方法测定的 ALP 水平与 7 年死亡率之间的关系(研究 2):结果:JSCC法测定的ALP水平比IFCC法测定的ALP水平高出约三倍,B型和O型血患者的ALP水平比A型和AB型血患者显著升高。同样,与 A 型血和 AB 型血相比,用 IFCC 方法测量的 B 型血和 O 型血患者的 ALP 水平也明显较高(研究 1)。即使在调整了患者背景后,ALP水平的最高三分位数仍显示全因死亡风险显著增加。然而,如果将血清肝功能相关指标或炎症指标作为协变量,这种显著性就会消失(研究 2):结论:JSCC法测定的ALP水平与预后相关,但由于B型和O型血患者以及肝功能异常或炎症患者的ALP水平升高,因此应谨慎对待。
Comparison of serum alkaline phosphatase levels between two measurement methods in chronic hemodialysis patients in Japan: involvement of ABO blood group system and relationship with mortality risk.
Background: Elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels are a risk factor for all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients. Traditionally in Japan, ALP measurements were conducted using the JSCC method, which yields higher ALP measurement values than the IFCC method, mainly due to its increased sensitivity to intestinal ALP.
Methods: Serum total ALP levels before and after switching the assay method from JSCC to IFCC were compared among different blood types in 521 hemodialysis patients (Study 1). The association between ALP levels measured by the JSCC method and 7-year mortality was analyzed, including blood types and liver function parameters as covariates, in 510 hemodialysis patients (Study 2).
Results: ALP levels measured by the JSCC method were approximately three times higher than those measured by the IFCC method, with significant elevation in patients with blood types B and O compared to those with blood types A and AB. Similarly, ALP levels measured by the IFCC method were significantly higher in patients with blood types B and O compared to those with blood types A and AB (Study 1). The highest tertile of ALP levels showed a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, even after adjusting for patient background. However, this significance disappeared when serum liver function-related or inflammatory markers were included as covariates (Study 2).
Conclusion: ALP levels measured by the JSCC method are associated with life prognosis, but caution should be exercised due to their elevation in patients with blood types B and O and in those with hepatic dysfunction or inflammation.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.