吲哚菁绿前哨淋巴结活检在子宫内膜癌中的作用及注射部位。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Current Opinion in Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1097/CCO.0000000000001075
Diego Raimondo, Antonio Raffone, Alberto Aguzzi, Linda Bertoldo, Renato Seracchioli
{"title":"吲哚菁绿前哨淋巴结活检在子宫内膜癌中的作用及注射部位。","authors":"Diego Raimondo, Antonio Raffone, Alberto Aguzzi, Linda Bertoldo, Renato Seracchioli","doi":"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The aim of the present narrative review is to summarize the state of art on sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in endometrial cancer, with a special focus on indocyanine green (ICG) as adopted tracer.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Over the years, the surgical nodal staging in patients with endometrial cancer has been intensively investigated. Traditionally, systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy represented the gold standard surgical treatment to assess nodal involvement of the tumor. Through the last two decades, SLNB has gradually replaced lymphadenectomy as a more targeted procedure. A great heterogeneity of tracers and injection techniques have been proposed to perform SLNB. However, no universally accepted recommendations are still available.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>SLNB has nowadays almost replaced pelvic lymphadenectomy in low-risk endometrial cancers, offering a better safety profile while being related to a comparable nodal involvement sensitivity. Currently, ICG is considered to be the most used tracer among others. Different injection sites have been proposed, with different detection features. While ICG cervical injection is nowadays the suggested technique for SLNB, noncervical injection techniques, such as hysteroscopic and combined procedures, seem to have a better accuracy in para-aortic nodal assessment, which have a role in high-risk endometrial cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10893,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy with indocyanine green and site of injection in endometrial cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Diego Raimondo, Antonio Raffone, Alberto Aguzzi, Linda Bertoldo, Renato Seracchioli\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The aim of the present narrative review is to summarize the state of art on sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in endometrial cancer, with a special focus on indocyanine green (ICG) as adopted tracer.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Over the years, the surgical nodal staging in patients with endometrial cancer has been intensively investigated. Traditionally, systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy represented the gold standard surgical treatment to assess nodal involvement of the tumor. Through the last two decades, SLNB has gradually replaced lymphadenectomy as a more targeted procedure. A great heterogeneity of tracers and injection techniques have been proposed to perform SLNB. However, no universally accepted recommendations are still available.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>SLNB has nowadays almost replaced pelvic lymphadenectomy in low-risk endometrial cancers, offering a better safety profile while being related to a comparable nodal involvement sensitivity. Currently, ICG is considered to be the most used tracer among others. Different injection sites have been proposed, with different detection features. While ICG cervical injection is nowadays the suggested technique for SLNB, noncervical injection techniques, such as hysteroscopic and combined procedures, seem to have a better accuracy in para-aortic nodal assessment, which have a role in high-risk endometrial cancers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001075\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001075","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:本综述旨在总结子宫内膜癌前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)的最新进展,特别关注采用吲哚菁绿(ICG)作为示踪剂的情况:多年来,人们一直在深入研究子宫内膜癌患者的手术结节分期。传统上,系统性盆腔和主动脉旁淋巴结切除术是评估肿瘤结节受累情况的金标准手术治疗方法。在过去的二十年中,SLNB 已逐渐取代淋巴结切除术,成为一种更具针对性的手术方法。进行 SLNB 的示踪剂和注射技术多种多样。总结:如今,SLNB 几乎取代了低风险子宫内膜癌的盆腔淋巴结切除术,其安全性更高,结节受累敏感性也相当。目前,ICG 被认为是最常用的示踪剂。不同的注射部位具有不同的检测特征。虽然 ICG 宫颈注射是目前 SLNB 的推荐技术,但非宫颈注射技术,如宫腔镜和联合手术,似乎在主动脉旁结节评估中具有更好的准确性,这在高风险子宫内膜癌中具有一定的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy with indocyanine green and site of injection in endometrial cancer.

Purpose of review: The aim of the present narrative review is to summarize the state of art on sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in endometrial cancer, with a special focus on indocyanine green (ICG) as adopted tracer.

Recent findings: Over the years, the surgical nodal staging in patients with endometrial cancer has been intensively investigated. Traditionally, systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy represented the gold standard surgical treatment to assess nodal involvement of the tumor. Through the last two decades, SLNB has gradually replaced lymphadenectomy as a more targeted procedure. A great heterogeneity of tracers and injection techniques have been proposed to perform SLNB. However, no universally accepted recommendations are still available.

Summary: SLNB has nowadays almost replaced pelvic lymphadenectomy in low-risk endometrial cancers, offering a better safety profile while being related to a comparable nodal involvement sensitivity. Currently, ICG is considered to be the most used tracer among others. Different injection sites have been proposed, with different detection features. While ICG cervical injection is nowadays the suggested technique for SLNB, noncervical injection techniques, such as hysteroscopic and combined procedures, seem to have a better accuracy in para-aortic nodal assessment, which have a role in high-risk endometrial cancers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Oncology
Current Opinion in Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With its easy-to-digest reviews on important advances in world literature, Current Opinion in Oncology offers expert evaluation on a wide range of topics from sixteen key disciplines including sarcomas, cancer biology, melanoma and endocrine tumors. Published bimonthly, each issue covers in detail the most pertinent advances in these fields from the previous year. This is supplemented by annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Novel vaccines against lung cancer. Perioperative immunotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer. Thymic malignancies: role of immunotherapy and novel approaches. Endocrine therapy for early breast cancer in the era of oral selective estrogen receptor degraders: challenges and future perspectives. Lung cancer screening in never smokers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1