杜匹单抗对特应性皮炎患者的长期疗效及停药原因

IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY JAMA dermatology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2517
Celeste M Boesjes, Esmé Kamphuis, Marlies de Graaf, Lotte S Spekhorst, Inge Haeck, Lian F van der Gang, Laura Loman, Nicolaas P A Zuithoff, Coco Dekkers, Lisa P van der Rijst, Geertruida L E Romeijn, Albert J Oosting, Antoni Gostynksi, Anneke M T van Lynden-van Nes, Ron A Tupker, Anne-Moon van Tuyll van Serooskerken, Annebeth Flinterman, Klaziena Politiek, Wouter R H Touwslager, Wianda A Christoffers, Shiarra M Stewart, Marijke Kamsteeg, Marie-Louise A Schuttelaar, Marjolein S de Bruin-Weller
{"title":"杜匹单抗对特应性皮炎患者的长期疗效及停药原因","authors":"Celeste M Boesjes, Esmé Kamphuis, Marlies de Graaf, Lotte S Spekhorst, Inge Haeck, Lian F van der Gang, Laura Loman, Nicolaas P A Zuithoff, Coco Dekkers, Lisa P van der Rijst, Geertruida L E Romeijn, Albert J Oosting, Antoni Gostynksi, Anneke M T van Lynden-van Nes, Ron A Tupker, Anne-Moon van Tuyll van Serooskerken, Annebeth Flinterman, Klaziena Politiek, Wouter R H Touwslager, Wianda A Christoffers, Shiarra M Stewart, Marijke Kamsteeg, Marie-Louise A Schuttelaar, Marjolein S de Bruin-Weller","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Limited data are available on the long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate clinical effectiveness and reasons for discontinuation of dupilumab treatment in children, adults, and older adults with AD with up to 5 years of treatment in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted using the BioDay registry (4 academic and 10 nonacademic hospitals in the Netherlands) to identify patients with AD of all ages who were treated with dupilumab between October 2017 and December 2022.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Clinical effectiveness was evaluated by the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), and numeric rating scale (NRS) for pruritus, stratified by children (<18 years), adults (18-64 years), and older adults (≥65 years). In addition, time to response, treatment responders, EASI subscores, second treatment episodes, and thymus- and activation-related chemokine and eosinophil levels were assessed. For patients who discontinued dupilumab, the reason for discontinuation was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1286 patients with AD (median [IQR] age, 38 [26-54] years; 726 [56.6%] male) were treated with dupilumab, including 130 children, 1025 adults, and 131 older adults. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 87.5 (32.0-157.0) weeks. Most patients maintained controlled AD, with EASI of 7 or lower and NRS for pruritus of 4 or lower varying between 78.6% and 92.3% and 72.2% and 88.2% for up to 5 years of treatment, respectively, while up to 70.5% of all patients prolonged the dosing interval to mostly 300 mg every 3 or 4 weeks. Mean EASI and NRS for pruritus were 2.7 (95% CI, 1.2-4.2) and 3.5 (95% CI, 2.7-4.3), respectively, after 5 years of treatment. Statistically significant differences between age groups were found over time for EASI and IGA; however, differences were rather small (week 52: EASI, 0.3-1.6; IGA, 0.12-0.26). No statistically significant differences between age groups were found for NRS for pruritus. Median thymus- and activation-related chemokine levels considerably decreased from 1751 pg/mL (95% CI, 1614-1900 pg/mL) to 390 pg/mL (95% CI, 368-413 pg/mL) after 6 months of treatment and remained low. Median eosinophil levels temporarily increased up to week 16, with a subsequently statistically significant decrease over time. In total, 306 patients (23.8%) discontinued dupilumab after a median (IQR) of 54.0 (29.0-110.00) weeks, with adverse events among 98 patients (7.6%) and ineffectiveness among 85 patients (6.6%) as the most frequently reported reasons. Forty-one patients (3.2%) restarted dupilumab, and most of these patients recaptured response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study with up to 5 years of follow-up, dupilumab maintained its clinical effectiveness, while two-thirds of patients tapered to a dosing interval of every 3 or 4 weeks. Treatment was discontinued in 23.8% of patients mainly due to adverse events and/or ineffectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"1044-1055"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11307167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Effectiveness and Reasons for Discontinuation of Dupilumab in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis.\",\"authors\":\"Celeste M Boesjes, Esmé Kamphuis, Marlies de Graaf, Lotte S Spekhorst, Inge Haeck, Lian F van der Gang, Laura Loman, Nicolaas P A Zuithoff, Coco Dekkers, Lisa P van der Rijst, Geertruida L E Romeijn, Albert J Oosting, Antoni Gostynksi, Anneke M T van Lynden-van Nes, Ron A Tupker, Anne-Moon van Tuyll van Serooskerken, Annebeth Flinterman, Klaziena Politiek, Wouter R H Touwslager, Wianda A Christoffers, Shiarra M Stewart, Marijke Kamsteeg, Marie-Louise A Schuttelaar, Marjolein S de Bruin-Weller\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Limited data are available on the long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate clinical effectiveness and reasons for discontinuation of dupilumab treatment in children, adults, and older adults with AD with up to 5 years of treatment in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted using the BioDay registry (4 academic and 10 nonacademic hospitals in the Netherlands) to identify patients with AD of all ages who were treated with dupilumab between October 2017 and December 2022.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Clinical effectiveness was evaluated by the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), and numeric rating scale (NRS) for pruritus, stratified by children (<18 years), adults (18-64 years), and older adults (≥65 years). In addition, time to response, treatment responders, EASI subscores, second treatment episodes, and thymus- and activation-related chemokine and eosinophil levels were assessed. For patients who discontinued dupilumab, the reason for discontinuation was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1286 patients with AD (median [IQR] age, 38 [26-54] years; 726 [56.6%] male) were treated with dupilumab, including 130 children, 1025 adults, and 131 older adults. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 87.5 (32.0-157.0) weeks. Most patients maintained controlled AD, with EASI of 7 or lower and NRS for pruritus of 4 or lower varying between 78.6% and 92.3% and 72.2% and 88.2% for up to 5 years of treatment, respectively, while up to 70.5% of all patients prolonged the dosing interval to mostly 300 mg every 3 or 4 weeks. Mean EASI and NRS for pruritus were 2.7 (95% CI, 1.2-4.2) and 3.5 (95% CI, 2.7-4.3), respectively, after 5 years of treatment. Statistically significant differences between age groups were found over time for EASI and IGA; however, differences were rather small (week 52: EASI, 0.3-1.6; IGA, 0.12-0.26). No statistically significant differences between age groups were found for NRS for pruritus. Median thymus- and activation-related chemokine levels considerably decreased from 1751 pg/mL (95% CI, 1614-1900 pg/mL) to 390 pg/mL (95% CI, 368-413 pg/mL) after 6 months of treatment and remained low. Median eosinophil levels temporarily increased up to week 16, with a subsequently statistically significant decrease over time. In total, 306 patients (23.8%) discontinued dupilumab after a median (IQR) of 54.0 (29.0-110.00) weeks, with adverse events among 98 patients (7.6%) and ineffectiveness among 85 patients (6.6%) as the most frequently reported reasons. Forty-one patients (3.2%) restarted dupilumab, and most of these patients recaptured response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study with up to 5 years of follow-up, dupilumab maintained its clinical effectiveness, while two-thirds of patients tapered to a dosing interval of every 3 or 4 weeks. Treatment was discontinued in 23.8% of patients mainly due to adverse events and/or ineffectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA dermatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1044-1055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11307167/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2517\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2517","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:在日常实践中,有关杜必鲁单抗治疗特应性皮炎(AD)的长期有效性和安全性的数据有限:目的:评估在日常实践中对患有特应性皮炎的儿童、成人和老年人进行长达 5 年治疗的杜必鲁单抗治疗的临床有效性和停药原因:这项前瞻性多中心队列研究通过BioDay登记处(荷兰4家学术医院和10家非学术医院)进行,以确定2017年10月至2022年12月期间接受过杜比单抗治疗的各年龄段AD患者:临床疗效通过湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)、研究者全球评估(IGA)和瘙痒数字评分量表(NRS)进行评估,并按儿童进行分层(结果:共有1286名AD患者(中位数[IQR]年龄为38[26-54]岁;726[56.6%]为男性)接受了dupilumab治疗,其中包括130名儿童、1025名成人和131名老年人。随访时间的中位数(IQR)为 87.5 (32.0-157.0) 周。在长达 5 年的治疗过程中,大多数患者的 AD 均得到了控制,EASI 为 7 或更低,瘙痒 NRS 为 4 或更低的患者分别占 78.6% 至 92.3% 和 72.2% 至 88.2%,多达 70.5% 的患者延长了给药间隔,大多为每 3 或 4 周一次,每次 300 毫克。治疗 5 年后,瘙痒的 EASI 和 NRS 平均值分别为 2.7(95% CI,1.2-4.2)和 3.5(95% CI,2.7-4.3)。不同年龄组的 EASI 和 IGA 在统计学上存在显著差异,但差异很小(第 52 周:EASI,0.3-1.6;IGA,0.12-0.26)。各年龄组之间的瘙痒 NRS 差异无统计学意义。胸腺和活化相关趋化因子的中位水平在治疗 6 个月后从 1751 pg/mL(95% CI,1614-1900 pg/mL)大幅降至 390 pg/mL(95% CI,368-413 pg/mL),并保持在较低水平。嗜酸性粒细胞水平中位数在第16周前暂时上升,随后随着时间的推移出现统计学意义上的显著下降。共有 306 名患者(23.8%)在中位数(IQR)为 54.0(29.0-110.00)周后停用了杜比鲁单抗,其中 98 名患者(7.6%)报告了不良反应,85 名患者(6.6%)报告了无效,这是最常见的停药原因。41名患者(3.2%)重新开始使用杜比鲁单抗,其中大部分患者重新获得了应答:在这项随访时间长达 5 年的队列研究中,杜必鲁单抗保持了其临床疗效,而三分之二的患者将用药间隔缩短为每 3 周或 4 周一次。23.8%的患者主要因不良反应和/或疗效不佳而停止治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-Term Effectiveness and Reasons for Discontinuation of Dupilumab in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis.

Importance: Limited data are available on the long-term effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (AD) in daily practice.

Objective: To evaluate clinical effectiveness and reasons for discontinuation of dupilumab treatment in children, adults, and older adults with AD with up to 5 years of treatment in daily practice.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective multicenter cohort study was conducted using the BioDay registry (4 academic and 10 nonacademic hospitals in the Netherlands) to identify patients with AD of all ages who were treated with dupilumab between October 2017 and December 2022.

Main outcomes and measures: Clinical effectiveness was evaluated by the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), and numeric rating scale (NRS) for pruritus, stratified by children (<18 years), adults (18-64 years), and older adults (≥65 years). In addition, time to response, treatment responders, EASI subscores, second treatment episodes, and thymus- and activation-related chemokine and eosinophil levels were assessed. For patients who discontinued dupilumab, the reason for discontinuation was evaluated.

Results: In total, 1286 patients with AD (median [IQR] age, 38 [26-54] years; 726 [56.6%] male) were treated with dupilumab, including 130 children, 1025 adults, and 131 older adults. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 87.5 (32.0-157.0) weeks. Most patients maintained controlled AD, with EASI of 7 or lower and NRS for pruritus of 4 or lower varying between 78.6% and 92.3% and 72.2% and 88.2% for up to 5 years of treatment, respectively, while up to 70.5% of all patients prolonged the dosing interval to mostly 300 mg every 3 or 4 weeks. Mean EASI and NRS for pruritus were 2.7 (95% CI, 1.2-4.2) and 3.5 (95% CI, 2.7-4.3), respectively, after 5 years of treatment. Statistically significant differences between age groups were found over time for EASI and IGA; however, differences were rather small (week 52: EASI, 0.3-1.6; IGA, 0.12-0.26). No statistically significant differences between age groups were found for NRS for pruritus. Median thymus- and activation-related chemokine levels considerably decreased from 1751 pg/mL (95% CI, 1614-1900 pg/mL) to 390 pg/mL (95% CI, 368-413 pg/mL) after 6 months of treatment and remained low. Median eosinophil levels temporarily increased up to week 16, with a subsequently statistically significant decrease over time. In total, 306 patients (23.8%) discontinued dupilumab after a median (IQR) of 54.0 (29.0-110.00) weeks, with adverse events among 98 patients (7.6%) and ineffectiveness among 85 patients (6.6%) as the most frequently reported reasons. Forty-one patients (3.2%) restarted dupilumab, and most of these patients recaptured response.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study with up to 5 years of follow-up, dupilumab maintained its clinical effectiveness, while two-thirds of patients tapered to a dosing interval of every 3 or 4 weeks. Treatment was discontinued in 23.8% of patients mainly due to adverse events and/or ineffectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA dermatology
JAMA dermatology DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
5.50%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery. JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care. The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists. JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.
期刊最新文献
Annular Eroded Plaque With Honey-Colored Crusting On Scrotum. Error in Figure 2. Low-Dose Oral Minoxidil Initiation for Patients With Hair Loss: An International Modified Delphi Consensus Statement. Salt and Atopic Dermatitis. Salt and Atopic Dermatitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1