利用全极映射锁定肺静脉心肌套管可减少射频应用和手术时间:一项概念验证研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1007/s10840-024-01888-7
Alejandro Vidal Margenat, Som Prabh Singh, Sarah Kondrach, Ellen Condoure, Jeremy Russell, Ramesh Hariharan
{"title":"利用全极映射锁定肺静脉心肌套管可减少射频应用和手术时间:一项概念验证研究。","authors":"Alejandro Vidal Margenat, Som Prabh Singh, Sarah Kondrach, Ellen Condoure, Jeremy Russell, Ramesh Hariharan","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01888-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There remains an imperative need to accurately map the left atrium in the setting of atrial fibrillation. While the pulmonary vein segmental ostial isolation plays a significant role in atrial fibrillation, clinical attempts to selectively ablate near the pulmonary vein myocardial sleeves have demonstrated a higher recurrence rate of arrhythmia given less precise mapping modalities. However, novel omnipolar mapping technology coupled with Advisor™ HD Grid Mapping Catheter may provide an advantageous profile to map and selectively ablate near the myocardial sleeves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort underwent ablation targeting the pulmonary vein myocardial sleeves with the use of omnipolar mapping technology and later wide area circumferential ablation (WACA) was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings of this study demonstrated a few number of lesions were required to achieve all PVI targeting PVMS at 36 (95% CI 32-41) compared to WACA at 81 (95% CI 73-90). PVMS radiofrequency time was shorter at 314 s (95% CI 278-350 s) compared to 799 s (95% CI 692-906 s) for WACA. Mean procedure time to complete PVMS was 59 min (95% CI 53-65) and to complete WACA was 90 min (95% CI 80-100).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Precision ablation near PVMS coupled with omnipolar technology may provide a superior profile in reducing procedure time and number of ablative lesions compared to WACA in the setting of atrial fibrillation with possible similar results. Future investigation using randomized controlled trials can help further support these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"83-91"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Targeting pulmonary vein myocardial sleeves with omnipolar mapping can reduce radiofrequency applications and procedure time: a proof-of-concept study.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Vidal Margenat, Som Prabh Singh, Sarah Kondrach, Ellen Condoure, Jeremy Russell, Ramesh Hariharan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-024-01888-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There remains an imperative need to accurately map the left atrium in the setting of atrial fibrillation. While the pulmonary vein segmental ostial isolation plays a significant role in atrial fibrillation, clinical attempts to selectively ablate near the pulmonary vein myocardial sleeves have demonstrated a higher recurrence rate of arrhythmia given less precise mapping modalities. However, novel omnipolar mapping technology coupled with Advisor™ HD Grid Mapping Catheter may provide an advantageous profile to map and selectively ablate near the myocardial sleeves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort underwent ablation targeting the pulmonary vein myocardial sleeves with the use of omnipolar mapping technology and later wide area circumferential ablation (WACA) was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings of this study demonstrated a few number of lesions were required to achieve all PVI targeting PVMS at 36 (95% CI 32-41) compared to WACA at 81 (95% CI 73-90). PVMS radiofrequency time was shorter at 314 s (95% CI 278-350 s) compared to 799 s (95% CI 692-906 s) for WACA. Mean procedure time to complete PVMS was 59 min (95% CI 53-65) and to complete WACA was 90 min (95% CI 80-100).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Precision ablation near PVMS coupled with omnipolar technology may provide a superior profile in reducing procedure time and number of ablative lesions compared to WACA in the setting of atrial fibrillation with possible similar results. Future investigation using randomized controlled trials can help further support these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"83-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01888-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01888-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在心房颤动的情况下,准确绘制左心房地图仍是当务之急。虽然肺静脉节段性骨膜隔离在心房颤动中起着重要作用,但临床尝试选择性消融肺静脉心肌套管附近的心律失常,结果表明,在不太精确的映射模式下,心律失常的复发率较高。然而,新型全极映射技术与 Advisor™ HD 网格映射导管结合使用,可为映射和选择性消融心肌套管附近的心律失常提供有利条件:该回顾性队列使用全极映射技术对肺静脉心肌袖进行了消融,随后进行了大面积环形消融(WACA):研究结果表明,与 WACA 的 81 次(95% CI 73-90)相比,针对 PVMS 的全部 PVI(36 次(95% CI 32-41))需要的病变次数更少。PVMS 射频时间较短,为 314 秒(95% CI 278-350 秒),而 WACA 为 799 秒(95% CI 692-906 秒)。完成 PVMS 的平均手术时间为 59 分钟(95% CI 53-65),完成 WACA 的平均手术时间为 90 分钟(95% CI 80-100):结论:与 WACA 相比,PVMS 附近的精确消融结合全极技术在减少心房颤动的手术时间和消融病灶数量方面可能更胜一筹,而且效果可能相似。未来采用随机对照试验进行的研究将有助于进一步证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Targeting pulmonary vein myocardial sleeves with omnipolar mapping can reduce radiofrequency applications and procedure time: a proof-of-concept study.

Background: There remains an imperative need to accurately map the left atrium in the setting of atrial fibrillation. While the pulmonary vein segmental ostial isolation plays a significant role in atrial fibrillation, clinical attempts to selectively ablate near the pulmonary vein myocardial sleeves have demonstrated a higher recurrence rate of arrhythmia given less precise mapping modalities. However, novel omnipolar mapping technology coupled with Advisor™ HD Grid Mapping Catheter may provide an advantageous profile to map and selectively ablate near the myocardial sleeves.

Methods: This retrospective cohort underwent ablation targeting the pulmonary vein myocardial sleeves with the use of omnipolar mapping technology and later wide area circumferential ablation (WACA) was performed.

Results: The findings of this study demonstrated a few number of lesions were required to achieve all PVI targeting PVMS at 36 (95% CI 32-41) compared to WACA at 81 (95% CI 73-90). PVMS radiofrequency time was shorter at 314 s (95% CI 278-350 s) compared to 799 s (95% CI 692-906 s) for WACA. Mean procedure time to complete PVMS was 59 min (95% CI 53-65) and to complete WACA was 90 min (95% CI 80-100).

Conclusion: Precision ablation near PVMS coupled with omnipolar technology may provide a superior profile in reducing procedure time and number of ablative lesions compared to WACA in the setting of atrial fibrillation with possible similar results. Future investigation using randomized controlled trials can help further support these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
期刊最新文献
Regional differences in the outcomes of leadless pacemaker implantation in the USA. Correlation between diagnosis-to-ablation time and atrial fibrillation recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Late gadolinium enhancement imaging for the prediction of ventricular tachycardia ablation outcome. Bipolar ablation: another arrow in the electrophysiologist's quiver when targeting intramural ventricular arrhythmias. Insights from optimal high-power ablation settings for anterior pulmonary vein wall isolation-A-Q-RATE POWER Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1