关于腿长不一致和全髋关节置换术的多中心调查:术后管理。

Q1 Medicine MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1007/s12306-024-00855-9
D Stimolo, S Lo Giudice, F Matassi, M Innocenti, R Civinini, F Boniforti
{"title":"关于腿长不一致和全髋关节置换术的多中心调查:术后管理。","authors":"D Stimolo, S Lo Giudice, F Matassi, M Innocenti, R Civinini, F Boniforti","doi":"10.1007/s12306-024-00855-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We created a Multicenter Survey for Italian orthopedics surgeons on how they approach leg length discrepancy when dealing with primary total hip arthroplasty. Aim of the study was to show how surgeons manage LLD and follow literature recommendations during clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Survey was composed of 25 questions divided in 4 sections: surgeon's profile, preoperative and intraoperative evaluation, postoperative management. In this paper, we report the absolute and relative frequencies of answers to section on \"postoperative management.\" Then, regarding the treatment of residual LLD, we reported whether trauma surgeons and experts in replacement surgery had higher odds ratios for providing \"literature-based\" answers compared to orthopedics physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only four questions received more than 70% agreement on one of the answers. The OR for giving the \"literature-based\" answer, taking OP as the reference group was 1.57 for TR and 1.72 for RS for 10 mm LLD at first follow-up (FU) and 1.23 TR and 1.32 RS when 20 mm. When 10 mm LLD at 3 months FU the OR was 0.88 TR and 1.15 RS. The OR for treatment of LLD after the first examination of a new patient was 2.16 TR and 1.85 RS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LLD is a debated topic with no definitive recommendations. Many decisions still depend on tradition. Treatment of LLD during clinical practice often differs from literature recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18875,"journal":{"name":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter survey about leg length discrepancy and total hip arthroplasty: postoperative management.\",\"authors\":\"D Stimolo, S Lo Giudice, F Matassi, M Innocenti, R Civinini, F Boniforti\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12306-024-00855-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We created a Multicenter Survey for Italian orthopedics surgeons on how they approach leg length discrepancy when dealing with primary total hip arthroplasty. Aim of the study was to show how surgeons manage LLD and follow literature recommendations during clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Survey was composed of 25 questions divided in 4 sections: surgeon's profile, preoperative and intraoperative evaluation, postoperative management. In this paper, we report the absolute and relative frequencies of answers to section on \\\"postoperative management.\\\" Then, regarding the treatment of residual LLD, we reported whether trauma surgeons and experts in replacement surgery had higher odds ratios for providing \\\"literature-based\\\" answers compared to orthopedics physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only four questions received more than 70% agreement on one of the answers. The OR for giving the \\\"literature-based\\\" answer, taking OP as the reference group was 1.57 for TR and 1.72 for RS for 10 mm LLD at first follow-up (FU) and 1.23 TR and 1.32 RS when 20 mm. When 10 mm LLD at 3 months FU the OR was 0.88 TR and 1.15 RS. The OR for treatment of LLD after the first examination of a new patient was 2.16 TR and 1.85 RS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LLD is a debated topic with no definitive recommendations. Many decisions still depend on tradition. Treatment of LLD during clinical practice often differs from literature recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-024-00855-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-024-00855-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们针对意大利骨科外科医生开展了一项多中心调查,以了解他们在进行初级全髋关节置换术时如何处理腿长不一致问题。该研究旨在展示外科医生在临床实践中如何处理腿长不一致问题并遵循文献建议:调查由 25 个问题组成,分为 4 个部分:外科医生简介、术前和术中评估、术后管理。本文报告了 "术后管理 "部分答案的绝对频率和相对频率。然后,关于残留 LLD 的治疗,我们报告了创伤外科医生和置换手术专家提供 "基于文献 "答案的几率是否高于骨科医生:结果:只有四个问题的其中一个答案的同意率超过 70%。以 OP 为参照组,首次随访(FU)时,当 LLD 为 10 mm 时,给出 "基于文献 "答案的比率分别为 1.57(TR)和 1.72(RS);当 LLD 为 20 mm 时,给出 "基于文献 "答案的比率分别为 1.23(TR)和 1.32(RS)。首次随访(FU)时,当 LLD 为 10 mm 时,OR 为 0.88 TR 和 1.15 RS。新患者首次检查后治疗 LLD 的 OR 为 2.16 TR 和 1.85 RS:LLD是一个备受争议的话题,目前尚无明确的建议。许多决定仍取决于传统。临床实践中对 LLD 的治疗往往与文献建议不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multicenter survey about leg length discrepancy and total hip arthroplasty: postoperative management.

Background: We created a Multicenter Survey for Italian orthopedics surgeons on how they approach leg length discrepancy when dealing with primary total hip arthroplasty. Aim of the study was to show how surgeons manage LLD and follow literature recommendations during clinical practice.

Methods: The Survey was composed of 25 questions divided in 4 sections: surgeon's profile, preoperative and intraoperative evaluation, postoperative management. In this paper, we report the absolute and relative frequencies of answers to section on "postoperative management." Then, regarding the treatment of residual LLD, we reported whether trauma surgeons and experts in replacement surgery had higher odds ratios for providing "literature-based" answers compared to orthopedics physicians.

Results: Only four questions received more than 70% agreement on one of the answers. The OR for giving the "literature-based" answer, taking OP as the reference group was 1.57 for TR and 1.72 for RS for 10 mm LLD at first follow-up (FU) and 1.23 TR and 1.32 RS when 20 mm. When 10 mm LLD at 3 months FU the OR was 0.88 TR and 1.15 RS. The OR for treatment of LLD after the first examination of a new patient was 2.16 TR and 1.85 RS.

Conclusions: LLD is a debated topic with no definitive recommendations. Many decisions still depend on tradition. Treatment of LLD during clinical practice often differs from literature recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Surgery – Formerly La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, founded in 1917 at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year. The journal provides up-to-date information to clinicians and scientists through the publication of original papers, reviews, case reports, and brief communications dealing with the pathogenesis and treatment of orthopaedic conditions.An electronic version is also available at http://www.springerlink.com.The journal is open for publication of supplements and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editors-in-Chief or the Publisher.
期刊最新文献
Identification of potential genes associated with metastasis in osteosarcoma: an integrated bioinformatics analysis. Outcome of total knee arthroplasty in patients with Blount disease or Blount-like deformity: a systematic review. Returning to running after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and a novel multimodal protocol. Outcome of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty conversion: a systematic review. Artificial intelligence in orthopedic research assistance: a resident's perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1