髁后偏移的最佳变化范围与初级全膝关节置换术的积极临床结果相关:回顾性分析

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1111/os.14183
Yanlin Zhong, Zengfa Deng, Cheng Gu, Ming Li, Yan Kang, Weiming Liao, Zhiqi Zhang
{"title":"髁后偏移的最佳变化范围与初级全膝关节置换术的积极临床结果相关:回顾性分析","authors":"Yanlin Zhong, Zengfa Deng, Cheng Gu, Ming Li, Yan Kang, Weiming Liao, Zhiqi Zhang","doi":"10.1111/os.14183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Posterior condylar offset (PCO) and anterior condylar offset (ACO) exert an influence on the sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is no common consensus that the variation range of posterior condylar offset (PCO) is associated with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the optimum variation range of PCO. This study aims to investigate the correlation between PCO and the PROMs of primary TKA for osteoarthritis (OA) and find out the optimal variation range of the PCO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we performed a radiographic analysis of 106 patients (112 knees) with primary TKA. Patients were divided into two cohorts (A and B) according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC). Correlations between the sagittal parameter and WOMAC were investigated using univariate and multivariate analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to establish the cut-off value for the optimal variation range. We then further investigated how different variation range affects the WOMAC subscale score and forgotten-joint-score-12 (FJS-12).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariate analysis revealed a correlation between the variation range of PCO (p < 0.01), ACO (p < 0.01) and PROMs. Multivariate analysis showed that only PCO was associated with PROMs. In the ROC graph, the cut-off value of the variation range of PCO is 2.85 mm (AUC = 0.66, Youden index = 0.26). The WOMAC functional ability score of the group outside the PCO variation range of 2.85 mm significantly increased compared to the group within the range.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, PCO variation was significantly associated with clinical outcomes in TKA and the optimal PCO variation range was within 2.85 mm. Maintaining the PCO variation within 2.85 mm could enhance functional recovery and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2708-2713"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Optimal Variation Range of Posterior Condylar Offset Associated with Positive Clinical Outcomes of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yanlin Zhong, Zengfa Deng, Cheng Gu, Ming Li, Yan Kang, Weiming Liao, Zhiqi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/os.14183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Posterior condylar offset (PCO) and anterior condylar offset (ACO) exert an influence on the sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is no common consensus that the variation range of posterior condylar offset (PCO) is associated with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the optimum variation range of PCO. This study aims to investigate the correlation between PCO and the PROMs of primary TKA for osteoarthritis (OA) and find out the optimal variation range of the PCO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we performed a radiographic analysis of 106 patients (112 knees) with primary TKA. Patients were divided into two cohorts (A and B) according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC). Correlations between the sagittal parameter and WOMAC were investigated using univariate and multivariate analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to establish the cut-off value for the optimal variation range. We then further investigated how different variation range affects the WOMAC subscale score and forgotten-joint-score-12 (FJS-12).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariate analysis revealed a correlation between the variation range of PCO (p < 0.01), ACO (p < 0.01) and PROMs. Multivariate analysis showed that only PCO was associated with PROMs. In the ROC graph, the cut-off value of the variation range of PCO is 2.85 mm (AUC = 0.66, Youden index = 0.26). The WOMAC functional ability score of the group outside the PCO variation range of 2.85 mm significantly increased compared to the group within the range.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, PCO variation was significantly associated with clinical outcomes in TKA and the optimal PCO variation range was within 2.85 mm. Maintaining the PCO variation within 2.85 mm could enhance functional recovery and patient satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2708-2713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541138/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14183\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14183","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:髁后偏移(PCO)和髁前偏移(ACO)对全膝关节置换术(TKA)的矢状对位有影响。然而,对于髁后偏移量(PCO)的变化范围与患者报告的结果指标(PROMs)以及 PCO 的最佳变化范围之间的关系,目前还没有达成共识。本研究旨在探讨髁后偏移量(PCO)与骨关节炎(OA)初次 TKA 患者报告结果(PROMs)之间的相关性,并找出 PCO 的最佳变化范围:在这项研究中,我们对106名初次TKA患者(112个膝关节)进行了放射学分析。根据西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)将患者分为两组(A 组和 B 组)。通过单变量和多变量分析研究了矢状面参数与 WOMAC 之间的相关性。接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)用于确定最佳变化范围的临界值。然后,我们进一步研究了不同的变化范围对 WOMAC 分量表评分和遗忘关节评分-12(FJS-12)的影响:结果:单变量分析表明,PCO 的变化范围与 WOMAC 分量表得分和遗忘关节评分-12(FJS-12)之间存在相关性:在这项研究中,PCO的变化与TKA的临床结果有显著相关性,最佳的PCO变化范围为2.85 mm以内。将 PCO 变化范围保持在 2.85 毫米以内可提高功能恢复和患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Optimal Variation Range of Posterior Condylar Offset Associated with Positive Clinical Outcomes of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis.

Objective: Posterior condylar offset (PCO) and anterior condylar offset (ACO) exert an influence on the sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is no common consensus that the variation range of posterior condylar offset (PCO) is associated with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the optimum variation range of PCO. This study aims to investigate the correlation between PCO and the PROMs of primary TKA for osteoarthritis (OA) and find out the optimal variation range of the PCO.

Methods: In this study, we performed a radiographic analysis of 106 patients (112 knees) with primary TKA. Patients were divided into two cohorts (A and B) according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC). Correlations between the sagittal parameter and WOMAC were investigated using univariate and multivariate analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to establish the cut-off value for the optimal variation range. We then further investigated how different variation range affects the WOMAC subscale score and forgotten-joint-score-12 (FJS-12).

Results: Univariate analysis revealed a correlation between the variation range of PCO (p < 0.01), ACO (p < 0.01) and PROMs. Multivariate analysis showed that only PCO was associated with PROMs. In the ROC graph, the cut-off value of the variation range of PCO is 2.85 mm (AUC = 0.66, Youden index = 0.26). The WOMAC functional ability score of the group outside the PCO variation range of 2.85 mm significantly increased compared to the group within the range.

Conclusion: In this study, PCO variation was significantly associated with clinical outcomes in TKA and the optimal PCO variation range was within 2.85 mm. Maintaining the PCO variation within 2.85 mm could enhance functional recovery and patient satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
期刊最新文献
Observation of the Clinical Efficacy of Self-Modified Skin-Stretching Device in the Treatment of Soft-Tissue Defects of the Heel: A Retrospective Single-Arm Cohort Study. How Accurately Does Bone Mineral Density Predict Bone Strength? A Clinical Observational Study of Osteoporosis Vertebral Compression Fractures in Postmenopausal Women. Comparison of Therapeutic Effects of Different Rehabilitation Methods on Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pear-Shaped Disc as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Sclerotic Modic Changes After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Research Progress on the Posterior Midline Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1