{"title":"对睡眠时间与高血压之间关系的系统综述和荟萃分析进行方法学和报告质量评估。","authors":"Qinglong Yang, Haodong Xian, Xianzong Cheng, Xiuming Wu, Jingyu Meng, Weizhong Chen, Ziqian Zeng","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02622-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is crucial to conduct systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) to make causal references, in order to inform the clinical guidelines and decision-making. The high reporting quality of reviews through compliance with the guidelines Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) could promote the consistency and reproducibility across the published articles. The purpose of this meta-epidemiological study is to evaluate the reporting methodological quality of SRs on the association between sleep duration and hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search in an online database was performed to retrieve systematic reviews and meta-analyses published up to 31st December 2022. Data screening and extraction were conducted by two investigators. The reporting quality of each included article was measured with reference to the 27-item 2020 PRISMA checklist, and methodological quality was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2. PRISMA evaluation was determined by total scores of individual SR and items scores and AMSTAR-2 assessment was also conducted using four categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2269 articles captured in the initial search, 15 SRs were included in the final analyses. All SRs had more than one incomplete PRISMA item. The mean of total scores was 20.5 (range 14-25), and the results of the AMSTAR-2 assessment were critically low to low. The reporting quality of \"rationale,\" \"objectives,\" \"selection process,\" \"study selection,\" \"discussion,\" and 'support' was fully reported. SRs that reported registration information and protocol had a higher PRISMA score than articles that reported certain deficiencies. From the results of the AMSTAR-2 assessment, the methodological quality of these SRs and MAs was critically low to low. None of the included literature provided a list of excluded articles, and the report of the search strategy was incomplete; half of the SRs did not use appropriate tools to assess the risk of bias in each included study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the reporting and methodological quality of overall studies are less than ideal, with several key items being consistently under-reported. The quality measured by AMSTAR-2 is mainly consistent with the quality of reporting. Authors, reviewers, and journal editors should raise awareness and move forward to encourage completeness of SR reporting based on the results, which can aid in enhancing the quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023459901.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological and reporting quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the association between sleep duration and hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Qinglong Yang, Haodong Xian, Xianzong Cheng, Xiuming Wu, Jingyu Meng, Weizhong Chen, Ziqian Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-024-02622-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is crucial to conduct systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) to make causal references, in order to inform the clinical guidelines and decision-making. The high reporting quality of reviews through compliance with the guidelines Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) could promote the consistency and reproducibility across the published articles. The purpose of this meta-epidemiological study is to evaluate the reporting methodological quality of SRs on the association between sleep duration and hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search in an online database was performed to retrieve systematic reviews and meta-analyses published up to 31st December 2022. Data screening and extraction were conducted by two investigators. The reporting quality of each included article was measured with reference to the 27-item 2020 PRISMA checklist, and methodological quality was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2. PRISMA evaluation was determined by total scores of individual SR and items scores and AMSTAR-2 assessment was also conducted using four categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2269 articles captured in the initial search, 15 SRs were included in the final analyses. All SRs had more than one incomplete PRISMA item. The mean of total scores was 20.5 (range 14-25), and the results of the AMSTAR-2 assessment were critically low to low. The reporting quality of \\\"rationale,\\\" \\\"objectives,\\\" \\\"selection process,\\\" \\\"study selection,\\\" \\\"discussion,\\\" and 'support' was fully reported. SRs that reported registration information and protocol had a higher PRISMA score than articles that reported certain deficiencies. From the results of the AMSTAR-2 assessment, the methodological quality of these SRs and MAs was critically low to low. None of the included literature provided a list of excluded articles, and the report of the search strategy was incomplete; half of the SRs did not use appropriate tools to assess the risk of bias in each included study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the reporting and methodological quality of overall studies are less than ideal, with several key items being consistently under-reported. The quality measured by AMSTAR-2 is mainly consistent with the quality of reporting. Authors, reviewers, and journal editors should raise awareness and move forward to encourage completeness of SR reporting based on the results, which can aid in enhancing the quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023459901.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302110/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02622-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02622-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:进行系统综述(SR)和荟萃分析(MA)以提供因果参考,从而为临床指南和决策提供信息,这一点至关重要。通过遵守《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)和《系统综述方法学质量评估-2》(AMSTAR-2)指南来提高综述的报告质量,可以促进已发表文章的一致性和可重复性。本项荟萃流行病学研究旨在评估睡眠时间与高血压之间关系的系统综述的报告方法学质量:方法:在在线数据库中进行电子搜索,检索截至 2022 年 12 月 31 日发表的系统综述和荟萃分析。数据筛选和提取由两名研究人员进行。每篇纳入文章的报告质量参照2020年27项PRISMA检查表进行衡量,方法学质量则使用AMSTAR-2进行评估。PRISMA 评估由单个 SR 和项目得分的总分决定,AMSTAR-2 评估也采用四个类别:结果:在初步检索的 2269 篇文章中,有 15 篇 SR 纳入了最终分析。所有 SR 都有一个以上不完整的 PRISMA 项目。总分的平均值为 20.5 分(范围为 14-25 分),AMSTAR-2 评估的结果为极低至低分。基本原理"、"目标"、"选择过程"、"研究选择"、"讨论 "和 "支持 "的报告质量完全符合要求。与报告了某些缺陷的文章相比,报告了注册信息和方案的 SR 的 PRISMA 得分更高。从 AMSTAR-2 评估的结果来看,这些 SR 和 MA 的方法学质量为极低至低。没有一篇纳入文献提供了排除文章的清单,检索策略的报告也不完整;半数SR没有使用适当的工具来评估每项纳入研究的偏倚风险:结论:总体研究的报告质量和方法质量都不太理想,有几个关键项目的报告一直不足。AMSTAR-2衡量的质量与报告质量基本一致。作者、审稿人和期刊编辑应提高认识,并根据结果鼓励SR报告的完整性,这有助于提高证据的质量:系统综述注册:prospero crd42023459901。
Methodological and reporting quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the association between sleep duration and hypertension.
Objective: It is crucial to conduct systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) to make causal references, in order to inform the clinical guidelines and decision-making. The high reporting quality of reviews through compliance with the guidelines Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) could promote the consistency and reproducibility across the published articles. The purpose of this meta-epidemiological study is to evaluate the reporting methodological quality of SRs on the association between sleep duration and hypertension.
Methods: An electronic search in an online database was performed to retrieve systematic reviews and meta-analyses published up to 31st December 2022. Data screening and extraction were conducted by two investigators. The reporting quality of each included article was measured with reference to the 27-item 2020 PRISMA checklist, and methodological quality was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2. PRISMA evaluation was determined by total scores of individual SR and items scores and AMSTAR-2 assessment was also conducted using four categories.
Results: Of 2269 articles captured in the initial search, 15 SRs were included in the final analyses. All SRs had more than one incomplete PRISMA item. The mean of total scores was 20.5 (range 14-25), and the results of the AMSTAR-2 assessment were critically low to low. The reporting quality of "rationale," "objectives," "selection process," "study selection," "discussion," and 'support' was fully reported. SRs that reported registration information and protocol had a higher PRISMA score than articles that reported certain deficiencies. From the results of the AMSTAR-2 assessment, the methodological quality of these SRs and MAs was critically low to low. None of the included literature provided a list of excluded articles, and the report of the search strategy was incomplete; half of the SRs did not use appropriate tools to assess the risk of bias in each included study.
Conclusions: Both the reporting and methodological quality of overall studies are less than ideal, with several key items being consistently under-reported. The quality measured by AMSTAR-2 is mainly consistent with the quality of reporting. Authors, reviewers, and journal editors should raise awareness and move forward to encourage completeness of SR reporting based on the results, which can aid in enhancing the quality of evidence.
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.