营养基因组学的循证实践:加拿大营养保健提供者教育需求评估》。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-07 DOI:10.3148/cjdpr-2024-010
Paulina Morelli, Véronique Garneau, Laurie Miville-Deschênes, Josiane Morin-Bernier, Marie-Claude Vohl, Sophie Desroches, Justine Keathley
{"title":"营养基因组学的循证实践:加拿大营养保健提供者教育需求评估》。","authors":"Paulina Morelli, Véronique Garneau, Laurie Miville-Deschênes, Josiane Morin-Bernier, Marie-Claude Vohl, Sophie Desroches, Justine Keathley","doi":"10.3148/cjdpr-2024-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To investigate why Canadian nutrition care providers choose, or not, to integrate nutritional genomics into practice, and to evaluate the nutritional genomics training/education experiences and needs of nutrition providers in Canada, while comparing those of dietitians to non-dietitians.<b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional online survey was distributed across Canada from June 2021 to April 2022.<b>Results:</b> In total, 457 healthcare providers (HCPs) [<i>n</i> = 371 dietitians (81.2%)] met the inclusion criteria. The majority (<i>n</i> = 372; 82.1%) reported having no experience offering nutritional genomics to clients (<i>n</i> = 4 did not respond). Of the 81 respondents with experience (17.9%), the most common reason to integrate nutrigenetic testing into practice was the perception that clients would be more motivated to change their eating habits (70.4%), while the most common reason for not integrating such tests was the perception that the nutrigenetic testing process is too complicated (<i>n</i> = 313; 84.1%). Dietitians were more likely than non-dietitians to view existing scientific evidence as an important educational topic (<i>p</i> = 0.002). The most selected useful educational resource by all HCPs was clinical practice guidelines (<i>n</i> = 364; 85.4%).<b>Conclusions:</b> Both dietitians and non-dietitians express a desire for greater nutritional genomics training/education; specific educational needs differ by type of HCP. Low implementation of nutrigenetic testing may be partly attributed to other identified barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":56135,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":"379-387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informing Evidence-based Practice in Nutritional Genomics: An Educational Needs Assessment of Nutrition Care Providers in Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Paulina Morelli, Véronique Garneau, Laurie Miville-Deschênes, Josiane Morin-Bernier, Marie-Claude Vohl, Sophie Desroches, Justine Keathley\",\"doi\":\"10.3148/cjdpr-2024-010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To investigate why Canadian nutrition care providers choose, or not, to integrate nutritional genomics into practice, and to evaluate the nutritional genomics training/education experiences and needs of nutrition providers in Canada, while comparing those of dietitians to non-dietitians.<b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional online survey was distributed across Canada from June 2021 to April 2022.<b>Results:</b> In total, 457 healthcare providers (HCPs) [<i>n</i> = 371 dietitians (81.2%)] met the inclusion criteria. The majority (<i>n</i> = 372; 82.1%) reported having no experience offering nutritional genomics to clients (<i>n</i> = 4 did not respond). Of the 81 respondents with experience (17.9%), the most common reason to integrate nutrigenetic testing into practice was the perception that clients would be more motivated to change their eating habits (70.4%), while the most common reason for not integrating such tests was the perception that the nutrigenetic testing process is too complicated (<i>n</i> = 313; 84.1%). Dietitians were more likely than non-dietitians to view existing scientific evidence as an important educational topic (<i>p</i> = 0.002). The most selected useful educational resource by all HCPs was clinical practice guidelines (<i>n</i> = 364; 85.4%).<b>Conclusions:</b> Both dietitians and non-dietitians express a desire for greater nutritional genomics training/education; specific educational needs differ by type of HCP. Low implementation of nutrigenetic testing may be partly attributed to other identified barriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"379-387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2024-010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2024-010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:调查加拿大营养保健提供者选择或不选择将营养基因组学纳入实践的原因,评估加拿大营养提供者的营养基因组学培训/教育经验和需求,同时比较营养师和非营养师的培训/教育经验和需求:方法:2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 4 月,在加拿大全国范围内开展了一项横向在线调查:共有 457 名医疗保健提供者(HCPs)[n = 371 名营养师(81.2%)]符合纳入标准。大多数受访者(n = 372;82.1%)表示没有为客户提供营养基因组学服务的经验(n = 4 人未回复)。在 81 位有经验的受访者(17.9%)中,将营养基因检测纳入实践的最常见原因是认为客户会更积极地改变饮食习惯(70.4%),而不纳入此类检测的最常见原因是认为营养基因检测过程过于复杂(n = 313;84.1%)。营养师比非营养师更有可能将现有科学证据视为重要的教育主题(p = 0.002)。所有保健医生选择最多的有用教育资源是临床实践指南(n = 364;85.4%):结论:营养师和非营养师都表示希望获得更多营养基因组学培训/教育;不同类型的 HCP 对具体教育的需求各不相同。营养基因检测实施率低的部分原因可能是其他已发现的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Informing Evidence-based Practice in Nutritional Genomics: An Educational Needs Assessment of Nutrition Care Providers in Canada.

Purpose: To investigate why Canadian nutrition care providers choose, or not, to integrate nutritional genomics into practice, and to evaluate the nutritional genomics training/education experiences and needs of nutrition providers in Canada, while comparing those of dietitians to non-dietitians.Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed across Canada from June 2021 to April 2022.Results: In total, 457 healthcare providers (HCPs) [n = 371 dietitians (81.2%)] met the inclusion criteria. The majority (n = 372; 82.1%) reported having no experience offering nutritional genomics to clients (n = 4 did not respond). Of the 81 respondents with experience (17.9%), the most common reason to integrate nutrigenetic testing into practice was the perception that clients would be more motivated to change their eating habits (70.4%), while the most common reason for not integrating such tests was the perception that the nutrigenetic testing process is too complicated (n = 313; 84.1%). Dietitians were more likely than non-dietitians to view existing scientific evidence as an important educational topic (p = 0.002). The most selected useful educational resource by all HCPs was clinical practice guidelines (n = 364; 85.4%).Conclusions: Both dietitians and non-dietitians express a desire for greater nutritional genomics training/education; specific educational needs differ by type of HCP. Low implementation of nutrigenetic testing may be partly attributed to other identified barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal considers manuscripts for publication that focus on applied food and nutrition research with direct application to the Canadian healthcare system and other contributions relevant to Canadian dietetic practice. The Journal does not publish market research studies, author opinions or animal studies. Manuscripts may be in English or French.
期刊最新文献
Parent/Caregiver Perceptions of the Good Food for Learning Universal School Lunch Program in Canada. From Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion to Justice: Calling in for Collective Learning and Action on Racism in Dietetics. Exploring the Social Determinants of Health in Nutrition Care for South Asian Communities: A Narrative Review. Examination of the Feelings and Experiences of Postpartum Mothers Engaging with Social Media: A Qualitative Study. Identifying and Mapping Canadian Registered Dietitians' Perceptions and Knowledge of and Experiences with Weight-Related Evidence: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1