伊朗柑橘种植者采用病虫害综合防治的情况:保护动机理论的应用。

IF 3.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Pest Management Science Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1002/ps.8358
Gholamhossein Abdollahzadeh, Christos A Damalas, Mohammad Sharif Sharifzadeh
{"title":"伊朗柑橘种植者采用病虫害综合防治的情况:保护动机理论的应用。","authors":"Gholamhossein Abdollahzadeh, Christos A Damalas, Mohammad Sharif Sharifzadeh","doi":"10.1002/ps.8358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated pest management (IPM) is recognized as a sustainable approach to pest control. However, adoption rates among farmers in Iran have been observed to be low. This study investigates the adoption of IPM practices among citrus farmers in Iran and assesses the applicability of the protection motivation theory (PMT) in explaining farmers' behavior towards IPM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, farmers reported poor levels of IPM use, paying attention only to monitoring practices among the three groups of IPM practices examined (prevention, monitoring, and suppression). The perceived severity of the consequences of chemical pest control (β = 0.389, P < 0.001), the response efficacy of IPM practices (β = 0.254, P < 0.001), and the perceived self-efficacy of using IPM practices (β = 0.199, P < 0.001) positively predicted adoption of IPM practices, while response cost/barriers of IPM practices (β = -0.355, P < 0.001) negatively predicted adoption of IPM practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PMT model presents a unique and interesting perspective to understand if and how IPM practices against the threat of pests are motivated. The perceived severity of the consequences of chemical pest control showed the strongest positive effect, whereas the response cost/barriers of IPM practices showed the strongest negative effect on IPM adoption. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":218,"journal":{"name":"Pest Management Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated pest management adoption among citrus growers in Iran: an application of the protection motivation theory.\",\"authors\":\"Gholamhossein Abdollahzadeh, Christos A Damalas, Mohammad Sharif Sharifzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ps.8358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrated pest management (IPM) is recognized as a sustainable approach to pest control. However, adoption rates among farmers in Iran have been observed to be low. This study investigates the adoption of IPM practices among citrus farmers in Iran and assesses the applicability of the protection motivation theory (PMT) in explaining farmers' behavior towards IPM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, farmers reported poor levels of IPM use, paying attention only to monitoring practices among the three groups of IPM practices examined (prevention, monitoring, and suppression). The perceived severity of the consequences of chemical pest control (β = 0.389, P < 0.001), the response efficacy of IPM practices (β = 0.254, P < 0.001), and the perceived self-efficacy of using IPM practices (β = 0.199, P < 0.001) positively predicted adoption of IPM practices, while response cost/barriers of IPM practices (β = -0.355, P < 0.001) negatively predicted adoption of IPM practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PMT model presents a unique and interesting perspective to understand if and how IPM practices against the threat of pests are motivated. The perceived severity of the consequences of chemical pest control showed the strongest positive effect, whereas the response cost/barriers of IPM practices showed the strongest negative effect on IPM adoption. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pest Management Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pest Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.8358\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pest Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.8358","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虫害综合防治(IPM)被认为是一种可持续的虫害防治方法。然而,据观察,伊朗农民的采用率很低。本研究调查了伊朗柑橘种植者采用 IPM 的情况,并评估了保护动机理论(PMT)在解释种植者 IPM 行为方面的适用性:总体而言,果农对 IPM 的使用水平较低,在所考察的三组 IPM 实践(预防、监测和抑制)中,果农只关注监测实践。对化学虫害控制后果严重程度的感知(β = 0.389,P 结论:农民对化学虫害控制后果严重程度的感知较低:PMT 模型提供了一个独特而有趣的视角,可用于了解针对害虫威胁的虫害综合防治措施是否以及如何被激发。对化学虫害控制后果严重程度的感知显示出最强的正效应,而 IPM 方法的响应成本/障碍则对 IPM 的采用显示出最强的负效应。© 2024 化学工业协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrated pest management adoption among citrus growers in Iran: an application of the protection motivation theory.

Background: Integrated pest management (IPM) is recognized as a sustainable approach to pest control. However, adoption rates among farmers in Iran have been observed to be low. This study investigates the adoption of IPM practices among citrus farmers in Iran and assesses the applicability of the protection motivation theory (PMT) in explaining farmers' behavior towards IPM.

Results: Overall, farmers reported poor levels of IPM use, paying attention only to monitoring practices among the three groups of IPM practices examined (prevention, monitoring, and suppression). The perceived severity of the consequences of chemical pest control (β = 0.389, P < 0.001), the response efficacy of IPM practices (β = 0.254, P < 0.001), and the perceived self-efficacy of using IPM practices (β = 0.199, P < 0.001) positively predicted adoption of IPM practices, while response cost/barriers of IPM practices (β = -0.355, P < 0.001) negatively predicted adoption of IPM practices.

Conclusion: The PMT model presents a unique and interesting perspective to understand if and how IPM practices against the threat of pests are motivated. The perceived severity of the consequences of chemical pest control showed the strongest positive effect, whereas the response cost/barriers of IPM practices showed the strongest negative effect on IPM adoption. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pest Management Science
Pest Management Science 农林科学-昆虫学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
9.80%
发文量
553
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Pest Management Science is the international journal of research and development in crop protection and pest control. Since its launch in 1970, the journal has become the premier forum for papers on the discovery, application, and impact on the environment of products and strategies designed for pest management. Published for SCI by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
期刊最新文献
Economic estimates of invasive wild ungulate damage to livestock producers in Hawai'i. Identification and field verification of the aggregation pheromone components produced by male Holotrichia parallela Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Interactions between prosulfocarb and trifluralin metabolism in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). The apparent seasonal biphenism in Drosophila suzukii stems in reality from continuous reaction norms. Volatilome of the maize phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium verticillioides: potential applications in diagnosis and biocontrol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1