评估 i-gel® Plus 声门上气道装置在择期手术中的应用:一项前瞻性国际多中心研究。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1111/anae.16401
Jakub Werner, Olga Klementova, Jan Bruthans, Jaromir Macoun, Tomasz Gaszynski, Tomas Henlin, Will Donaldson, Erik Lichnovsky, Shiva Arava, Ana M Lopez, Raquel Berge, Pavel Michalek
{"title":"评估 i-gel® Plus 声门上气道装置在择期手术中的应用:一项前瞻性国际多中心研究。","authors":"Jakub Werner, Olga Klementova, Jan Bruthans, Jaromir Macoun, Tomasz Gaszynski, Tomas Henlin, Will Donaldson, Erik Lichnovsky, Shiva Arava, Ana M Lopez, Raquel Berge, Pavel Michalek","doi":"10.1111/anae.16401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The i-gel® Plus is a modified version of the i-gel® supraglottic airway device. It contains a wider drainage port; a longer tip; ramps inside the breathing channel; and an additional port for oxygen delivery. There has been no prospective evaluation of this device in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the performance of the i-gel Plus in adult patients undergoing elective procedures under general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was overall insertion success rate, defined as the ability to provide effective airway management through the device from insertion until the end of the surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included device performance and incidence of postoperative adverse events. Data from the first 1000 patients are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1012 patients were enrolled; 12 forms were excluded from the final analysis due to incomplete data leaving 1000 included patients (545 female). Overall insertion success rate was 98.6%, with a first-attempt success rate of insertion of 88.2%. A significant difference between females and males was seen for the overall success rate (97.4% vs. 99.6% respectively) but not for first-attempt successful insertion. Mean (SD) oropharyngeal seal pressure was 32 (7) cmH<sub>2</sub>O. The only independent factor that increased the risk of first-attempt failure was low operator experience. Complications included desaturation < 85% in 0.6%; traces of blood on the device in 7.4%; laryngospasm in 0.5%; and gastric contents inside the bowl in 0.2% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The i-gel Plus appears to be an effective supraglottic airway device that is associated with a high insertion success rate and a reasonably low incidence of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the i-gel® Plus supraglottic airway device in elective surgery: a prospective international multicentre study.\",\"authors\":\"Jakub Werner, Olga Klementova, Jan Bruthans, Jaromir Macoun, Tomasz Gaszynski, Tomas Henlin, Will Donaldson, Erik Lichnovsky, Shiva Arava, Ana M Lopez, Raquel Berge, Pavel Michalek\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anae.16401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The i-gel® Plus is a modified version of the i-gel® supraglottic airway device. It contains a wider drainage port; a longer tip; ramps inside the breathing channel; and an additional port for oxygen delivery. There has been no prospective evaluation of this device in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the performance of the i-gel Plus in adult patients undergoing elective procedures under general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was overall insertion success rate, defined as the ability to provide effective airway management through the device from insertion until the end of the surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included device performance and incidence of postoperative adverse events. Data from the first 1000 patients are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1012 patients were enrolled; 12 forms were excluded from the final analysis due to incomplete data leaving 1000 included patients (545 female). Overall insertion success rate was 98.6%, with a first-attempt success rate of insertion of 88.2%. A significant difference between females and males was seen for the overall success rate (97.4% vs. 99.6% respectively) but not for first-attempt successful insertion. Mean (SD) oropharyngeal seal pressure was 32 (7) cmH<sub>2</sub>O. The only independent factor that increased the risk of first-attempt failure was low operator experience. Complications included desaturation < 85% in 0.6%; traces of blood on the device in 7.4%; laryngospasm in 0.5%; and gastric contents inside the bowl in 0.2% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The i-gel Plus appears to be an effective supraglottic airway device that is associated with a high insertion success rate and a reasonably low incidence of complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16401\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16401","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:i-gel® Plus 是 i-gel® 声门上气道装置的改进版。它包含一个更宽的引流口;一个更长的尖端;呼吸通道内的斜坡;以及一个额外的氧气输送口。目前还没有在临床实践中对该装置进行前瞻性评估:这项国际多中心前瞻性队列研究旨在评估 i-gel Plus 在全身麻醉下接受择期手术的成年患者中的表现。主要结果是总体插入成功率,即从插入到手术结束期间通过该装置提供有效气道管理的能力。次要结果包括设备性能和术后不良事件发生率。报告了前 1000 例患者的数据:共有 1012 名患者入选;由于数据不完整,最终分析中剔除了 12 份表格,剩下 1000 名入选患者(545 名女性)。总体插入成功率为 98.6%,首次插入成功率为 88.2%。女性和男性在总体成功率上存在明显差异(分别为 97.4% 和 99.6%),但在首次尝试成功插入方面没有明显差异。口咽密封压力的平均值(标度)为 32 (7) cmH2O。增加首次尝试失败风险的唯一独立因素是操作者经验不足。并发症包括饱和度降低:i-gel Plus 似乎是一种有效的声门上气道装置,插入成功率高,并发症发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the i-gel® Plus supraglottic airway device in elective surgery: a prospective international multicentre study.

Background: The i-gel® Plus is a modified version of the i-gel® supraglottic airway device. It contains a wider drainage port; a longer tip; ramps inside the breathing channel; and an additional port for oxygen delivery. There has been no prospective evaluation of this device in clinical practice.

Methods: This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the performance of the i-gel Plus in adult patients undergoing elective procedures under general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was overall insertion success rate, defined as the ability to provide effective airway management through the device from insertion until the end of the surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included device performance and incidence of postoperative adverse events. Data from the first 1000 patients are reported.

Results: In total, 1012 patients were enrolled; 12 forms were excluded from the final analysis due to incomplete data leaving 1000 included patients (545 female). Overall insertion success rate was 98.6%, with a first-attempt success rate of insertion of 88.2%. A significant difference between females and males was seen for the overall success rate (97.4% vs. 99.6% respectively) but not for first-attempt successful insertion. Mean (SD) oropharyngeal seal pressure was 32 (7) cmH2O. The only independent factor that increased the risk of first-attempt failure was low operator experience. Complications included desaturation < 85% in 0.6%; traces of blood on the device in 7.4%; laryngospasm in 0.5%; and gastric contents inside the bowl in 0.2% of patients.

Conclusions: The i-gel Plus appears to be an effective supraglottic airway device that is associated with a high insertion success rate and a reasonably low incidence of complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of opioid-free and opioid-inclusive propofol anaesthesia for thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a reply Comparison of opioid-free and opioid-inclusive propofol anaesthesia for thyroid and parathyroid surgery Screening of patients at risk of postoperative delirium using specific neuropsychological testing Usability comparison scoring of video and direct laryngoscopes: a reply Prognostic clinical prediction models for acute post-surgical pain in adults: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1