外科医生科学家正在灭绝--最后的行动呼吁还是为时已晚?

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006486
Matthias Pfister, Zhihao Li, Florian Huwyler, Mark W Tibbitt, Milo A Puhan, Pierre-Alain Clavien
{"title":"外科医生科学家正在灭绝--最后的行动呼吁还是为时已晚?","authors":"Matthias Pfister, Zhihao Li, Florian Huwyler, Mark W Tibbitt, Milo A Puhan, Pierre-Alain Clavien","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To define the concept of surgeon-scientists and identify the root causes of their decline in number and impact. The secondary aim was to provide actionable remedies.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgeons who conduct research in addition to patient care are referred to as «surgeon-scientists». While their value to society remains undisputed, their numbers and associated impact have been plunging. While reasons have been well identified along with proposals for countermeasures, their application have largely failed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review covering all aspects of surgeon-scientists together with a global online survey among 141 young academic surgeons. Using gap analysis, we determined implementation gaps for proposed measures. Then, we developed a comprehensive rescue package.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A surgeon-scientist must actively and continuously engage in both patient care and research. Competence in either field must be established through protected training and criteria of excellence, particularly reflecting contribution to innovation. The decline of surgeon-scientists has reached unprecedented magnitude. Leadership turning hospitals into «profit-factories» is one reason, a flawed selection process not exclusively based on excellence another. Most importantly, the appreciation for the academic mission has vanished. Along with fundamentally addressing these root causes, surgeon-scientists' path to excellence must be streamlined, and their continuous devotion for innovation cherished.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The journey of the surgeon-scientist is at crossroads. As society, we either adapt and shift our priorities again towards innovation or capitulate to the greed for profit, permanently losing these invaluable professionals. Successful rescue packages must not only involve hospitals and universities but also the political sphere.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgeon-Scientists Going Extinct - Last Call for Action or Too Late?\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Pfister, Zhihao Li, Florian Huwyler, Mark W Tibbitt, Milo A Puhan, Pierre-Alain Clavien\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To define the concept of surgeon-scientists and identify the root causes of their decline in number and impact. The secondary aim was to provide actionable remedies.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgeons who conduct research in addition to patient care are referred to as «surgeon-scientists». While their value to society remains undisputed, their numbers and associated impact have been plunging. While reasons have been well identified along with proposals for countermeasures, their application have largely failed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review covering all aspects of surgeon-scientists together with a global online survey among 141 young academic surgeons. Using gap analysis, we determined implementation gaps for proposed measures. Then, we developed a comprehensive rescue package.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A surgeon-scientist must actively and continuously engage in both patient care and research. Competence in either field must be established through protected training and criteria of excellence, particularly reflecting contribution to innovation. The decline of surgeon-scientists has reached unprecedented magnitude. Leadership turning hospitals into «profit-factories» is one reason, a flawed selection process not exclusively based on excellence another. Most importantly, the appreciation for the academic mission has vanished. Along with fundamentally addressing these root causes, surgeon-scientists' path to excellence must be streamlined, and their continuous devotion for innovation cherished.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The journey of the surgeon-scientist is at crossroads. As society, we either adapt and shift our priorities again towards innovation or capitulate to the greed for profit, permanently losing these invaluable professionals. Successful rescue packages must not only involve hospitals and universities but also the political sphere.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006486\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006486","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:定义外科医生科学家的概念,并找出其数量和影响力下降的根本原因。其次是提供可行的补救措施:背景:除了为患者提供治疗外,还从事研究工作的外科医生被称为 "外科医生科学家"。虽然他们对社会的价值毋庸置疑,但他们的人数和相关影响却在急剧下降。虽然已经明确了原因并提出了对策建议,但这些建议的应用基本上都失败了:我们对外科医生-科学家的各个方面进行了系统回顾,并对 141 名年轻的学术外科医生进行了全球在线调查。通过差距分析,我们确定了建议措施的实施差距。然后,我们制定了一套综合救援方案:外科医生-科学家必须积极、持续地参与患者护理和研究工作。必须通过受保护的培训和卓越标准,特别是反映对创新的贡献,来建立在任一领域的能力。外科医生-科学家的减少达到了前所未有的程度。领导层把医院变成了 "利润工厂 "是原因之一,而不完全以优秀为标准的错误选拔程序则是另一个原因。最重要的是,对学术使命的重视已经消失。在从根本上解决这些根源问题的同时,必须理顺外科医生-科学家通往卓越的道路,并珍惜他们不断创新的奉献精神:外科医生-科学家的发展正处于十字路口。作为社会,我们要么做出调整,重新将工作重点转向创新,要么屈服于对利润的贪婪,永远失去这些宝贵的专业人员。成功的拯救方案不仅需要医院和大学的参与,还需要政治领域的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Surgeon-Scientists Going Extinct - Last Call for Action or Too Late?

Objective: To define the concept of surgeon-scientists and identify the root causes of their decline in number and impact. The secondary aim was to provide actionable remedies.

Background: Surgeons who conduct research in addition to patient care are referred to as «surgeon-scientists». While their value to society remains undisputed, their numbers and associated impact have been plunging. While reasons have been well identified along with proposals for countermeasures, their application have largely failed.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review covering all aspects of surgeon-scientists together with a global online survey among 141 young academic surgeons. Using gap analysis, we determined implementation gaps for proposed measures. Then, we developed a comprehensive rescue package.

Results: A surgeon-scientist must actively and continuously engage in both patient care and research. Competence in either field must be established through protected training and criteria of excellence, particularly reflecting contribution to innovation. The decline of surgeon-scientists has reached unprecedented magnitude. Leadership turning hospitals into «profit-factories» is one reason, a flawed selection process not exclusively based on excellence another. Most importantly, the appreciation for the academic mission has vanished. Along with fundamentally addressing these root causes, surgeon-scientists' path to excellence must be streamlined, and their continuous devotion for innovation cherished.

Conclusion: The journey of the surgeon-scientist is at crossroads. As society, we either adapt and shift our priorities again towards innovation or capitulate to the greed for profit, permanently losing these invaluable professionals. Successful rescue packages must not only involve hospitals and universities but also the political sphere.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
期刊最新文献
The Blue Ribbon Committee II Report and Recommendations on Surgical Education and Training in the United States: 2024. Consequences of a Surveillance Strategy for Side-branch Intraductal Pancreatic Mucinous Neoplasms: Long-term Follow-up of One Thousand Cysts. Extended Pharmacologic Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism After Colon Cancer Surgery Is Associated With Improved Long-term Survival: A Natural Experiment in the Chemotherapeutic Benefit of Heparin Derivatives. Optimal Timing for Initiation of Thromboprophylaxis After Hepatic Angioembolization. Circulating MicroRNA as a Potential Biomarker for Skeletal Disease in Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Case-control Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1