年轻和老年患者严重孤立性钝性胸部创伤的治疗效果。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02611-x
Vahe S Panossian, Emanuele Lagazzi, Wardah Rafaqat, May Abiad, Ikemsinachi C Nzenwa, Suzanne Arnold, Anne H Hoekman, Karen A Ghaddar, Michael P DeWane, George C Velmahos, Haytham M A Kaafarani, John O Hwabejire
{"title":"年轻和老年患者严重孤立性钝性胸部创伤的治疗效果。","authors":"Vahe S Panossian, Emanuele Lagazzi, Wardah Rafaqat, May Abiad, Ikemsinachi C Nzenwa, Suzanne Arnold, Anne H Hoekman, Karen A Ghaddar, Michael P DeWane, George C Velmahos, Haytham M A Kaafarani, John O Hwabejire","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02611-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our understanding of the growing geriatric population's risk factors for outcomes after traumatic injury remains incomplete. This study aims to compare outcomes of severe isolated blunt chest trauma between young and geriatric patients and assess predictors of mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ACS-TQIP 2017-2020 database was used to identify patients with severe isolated blunt chest trauma. Patients having extra-thoracic injuries, no signs of life upon presentation to the emergency department (ED), prehospital cardiac arrest, or who were transferred to or from other hospitals were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess independent predictors of mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 189,660 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 58 years; 37.5% were aged 65 or older, and 1.9% died by discharge. Patients aged 65 and older had significantly higher mortality (3.4% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001) and overall complications (7.0% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001) compared to younger patients. Age ≥ 65 was independently associated with mortality (OR: 5.45, 95%CI: 4.96-5.98, p < 0.001), prolonged hospitalization, and complications. In the geriatric group, age > 75 was an independent predictor of mortality compared to ages 65-75 (OR: 2.62, 95%CI: 2.37-2.89, p < 0.001). Geriatric patients with an MVC, presenting with a GCS ≤ 8, and having an SBP < 90 had the highest mortality of 56.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The geriatric trauma patient with isolated severe blunt chest injury has significantly higher mortality and morbidity compared to younger patients and warrants special consideration of multiple factors that affect outcomes. Individual predictors of mortality carry a greater impact on mortality in geriatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of severe isolated blunt chest trauma in young and geriatric patients.\",\"authors\":\"Vahe S Panossian, Emanuele Lagazzi, Wardah Rafaqat, May Abiad, Ikemsinachi C Nzenwa, Suzanne Arnold, Anne H Hoekman, Karen A Ghaddar, Michael P DeWane, George C Velmahos, Haytham M A Kaafarani, John O Hwabejire\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00068-024-02611-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our understanding of the growing geriatric population's risk factors for outcomes after traumatic injury remains incomplete. This study aims to compare outcomes of severe isolated blunt chest trauma between young and geriatric patients and assess predictors of mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ACS-TQIP 2017-2020 database was used to identify patients with severe isolated blunt chest trauma. Patients having extra-thoracic injuries, no signs of life upon presentation to the emergency department (ED), prehospital cardiac arrest, or who were transferred to or from other hospitals were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess independent predictors of mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 189,660 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 58 years; 37.5% were aged 65 or older, and 1.9% died by discharge. Patients aged 65 and older had significantly higher mortality (3.4% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001) and overall complications (7.0% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001) compared to younger patients. Age ≥ 65 was independently associated with mortality (OR: 5.45, 95%CI: 4.96-5.98, p < 0.001), prolonged hospitalization, and complications. In the geriatric group, age > 75 was an independent predictor of mortality compared to ages 65-75 (OR: 2.62, 95%CI: 2.37-2.89, p < 0.001). Geriatric patients with an MVC, presenting with a GCS ≤ 8, and having an SBP < 90 had the highest mortality of 56.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The geriatric trauma patient with isolated severe blunt chest injury has significantly higher mortality and morbidity compared to younger patients and warrants special consideration of multiple factors that affect outcomes. Individual predictors of mortality carry a greater impact on mortality in geriatric patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02611-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02611-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们对日益增多的老年人群在创伤后的风险因素仍不完全了解。本研究旨在比较年轻患者和老年患者严重孤立性钝性胸部创伤的预后,并评估死亡率的预测因素:使用 ACS-TQIP 2017-2020 数据库识别严重孤立性钝性胸部创伤患者。排除胸外损伤、急诊科(ED)就诊时无生命迹象、院前心脏骤停或转入或转出其他医院的患者。主要结果是院内死亡率。进行了单变量和多变量回归分析,以评估死亡率的独立预测因素:研究共纳入了189660名患者,中位年龄为58岁;37.5%的患者年龄在65岁或以上,1.9%的患者在出院时死亡。与 65-75 岁的患者相比,65 岁及以上的患者死亡率明显更高(3.4% vs. 1.0%,p 75 岁是死亡率的独立预测因素(OR:2.62,95%CI:2.37-2.89,p 结论:65 岁及以上的患者死亡率明显高于 65-75 岁的患者(OR:2.62,95%CI:2.37-2.89,p 75 岁是死亡率的独立预测因素):与年轻患者相比,患有孤立性严重钝性胸部损伤的老年创伤患者的死亡率和发病率明显更高,因此需要特别考虑影响结果的多种因素。死亡率的个别预测因素对老年患者死亡率的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of severe isolated blunt chest trauma in young and geriatric patients.

Purpose: Our understanding of the growing geriatric population's risk factors for outcomes after traumatic injury remains incomplete. This study aims to compare outcomes of severe isolated blunt chest trauma between young and geriatric patients and assess predictors of mortality.

Methods: The ACS-TQIP 2017-2020 database was used to identify patients with severe isolated blunt chest trauma. Patients having extra-thoracic injuries, no signs of life upon presentation to the emergency department (ED), prehospital cardiac arrest, or who were transferred to or from other hospitals were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess independent predictors of mortality.

Results: A total of 189,660 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 58 years; 37.5% were aged 65 or older, and 1.9% died by discharge. Patients aged 65 and older had significantly higher mortality (3.4% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001) and overall complications (7.0% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001) compared to younger patients. Age ≥ 65 was independently associated with mortality (OR: 5.45, 95%CI: 4.96-5.98, p < 0.001), prolonged hospitalization, and complications. In the geriatric group, age > 75 was an independent predictor of mortality compared to ages 65-75 (OR: 2.62, 95%CI: 2.37-2.89, p < 0.001). Geriatric patients with an MVC, presenting with a GCS ≤ 8, and having an SBP < 90 had the highest mortality of 56.9%.

Conclusion: The geriatric trauma patient with isolated severe blunt chest injury has significantly higher mortality and morbidity compared to younger patients and warrants special consideration of multiple factors that affect outcomes. Individual predictors of mortality carry a greater impact on mortality in geriatric patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
期刊最新文献
Initial surgical management of injuries to the lower extremities in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries - A systematic review and clinical practice guideline update. 23rd European Congress of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. Cerebral haemodynamics and intracranial pressure during haemorrhagic shock and resuscitation with total endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in an animal model. Focus on thoracolumbar spine injuries. Evaluating predictors of mortality in octogenarians undergoing urgent or emergent trauma laparotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1