比较异步在线课堂中的交互式教学和论坛。

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of applied behavior analysis Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1002/jaba.2905
Sacha K. G. Shaw, Jennifer L. Posey, Thomas Zane, Mary Jane Weiss
{"title":"比较异步在线课堂中的交互式教学和论坛。","authors":"Sacha K. G. Shaw,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Posey,&nbsp;Thomas Zane,&nbsp;Mary Jane Weiss","doi":"10.1002/jaba.2905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current study compared the effects of interteaching and discussion forum activities on quiz and assignment scores in a master's-level asynchronous research methods course. In an alternating-treatments design, six participants engaged in interteaching on half of the weeks and in the discussion forum on alternate weeks. Participants in the interteaching condition (<i>M</i> = 96.75) generally scored higher on quizzes than did those in the discussion forum condition (<i>M</i> = 75.95). The results of a paired-sample <i>t</i> test indicated statistically significant differences between the two conditions at <i>p</i> &lt; .0001, with a substantial effect size of 0.6760. Significant differences in assignment scores were not observed between the interteaching (<i>M =</i> 87.28) and discussion forum (<i>M =</i> 89.08) conditions. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","volume":"57 4","pages":"989-998"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing interteaching and discussion forums in an asynchronous online classroom\",\"authors\":\"Sacha K. G. Shaw,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Posey,&nbsp;Thomas Zane,&nbsp;Mary Jane Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jaba.2905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The current study compared the effects of interteaching and discussion forum activities on quiz and assignment scores in a master's-level asynchronous research methods course. In an alternating-treatments design, six participants engaged in interteaching on half of the weeks and in the discussion forum on alternate weeks. Participants in the interteaching condition (<i>M</i> = 96.75) generally scored higher on quizzes than did those in the discussion forum condition (<i>M</i> = 75.95). The results of a paired-sample <i>t</i> test indicated statistically significant differences between the two conditions at <i>p</i> &lt; .0001, with a substantial effect size of 0.6760. Significant differences in assignment scores were not observed between the interteaching (<i>M =</i> 87.28) and discussion forum (<i>M =</i> 89.08) conditions. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied behavior analysis\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"989-998\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied behavior analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaba.2905\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaba.2905","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究比较了在一门硕士水平的异步研究方法课程中,教学间活动和论坛活动对测验和作业成绩的影响。在交替处理设计中,六名参与者有一半周参与了教师间教学,另一半周参与了论坛讨论。参与互动教学的学员(M = 96.75)的测验分数普遍高于参与论坛讨论的学员(M = 75.95)。配对样本 t 检验的结果表明,两种条件下的学生在 p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing interteaching and discussion forums in an asynchronous online classroom

The current study compared the effects of interteaching and discussion forum activities on quiz and assignment scores in a master's-level asynchronous research methods course. In an alternating-treatments design, six participants engaged in interteaching on half of the weeks and in the discussion forum on alternate weeks. Participants in the interteaching condition (M = 96.75) generally scored higher on quizzes than did those in the discussion forum condition (M = 75.95). The results of a paired-sample t test indicated statistically significant differences between the two conditions at p < .0001, with a substantial effect size of 0.6760. Significant differences in assignment scores were not observed between the interteaching (M = 87.28) and discussion forum (M = 89.08) conditions. Limitations and directions for future research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of applied behavior analysis
Journal of applied behavior analysis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.70%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the social acceptability of the Re-Connect concept: A smartphone-based, nonfinancial, contingency management intervention. Contingency management for monosubstance use disorders: Systematic review and assessment of predicted versus obtained effects. Choice versus no choice: Practical considerations for increasing choices. Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior by domesticated canines. Effects of social interaction on leisure item preference and reinforcer efficacy for children with autism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1