针对执业护士的遥测中止教育可降低医院成本--质量改进项目。

Christopher Rodriguez, Nicole Bianco, Theresa Bucco, Karen Collum, Sharon Patricia O'Neill, Daniel David
{"title":"针对执业护士的遥测中止教育可降低医院成本--质量改进项目。","authors":"Christopher Rodriguez, Nicole Bianco, Theresa Bucco, Karen Collum, Sharon Patricia O'Neill, Daniel David","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000001062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite updated American Heart Association guidelines, interventions designed to reduce telemetry misuse are uncommon.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>There was a systemic failure within the institution to adopt the most recent guidelines, resulting in poor use of resources and downstream costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Case-control. Pre-post educational intervention, quality-improvement (QI) project in an urban academic cancer institution. Baseline telemetry usage was observed in 2,984 nonintensive inpatients in 21 hospital services over 6 months. Outcome measures were weekly telemetry usage in total minutes and cost savings based on a cost-predicted algorithm. Performance was compared between the intervention group and a control group for 3 months. Measures were compared using QI control charts and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Three high-using telemetry services primarily staffed by certified nurse practitioners (CNPs) were provided with a telemetry education intervention. The intervention consisted of four ten-minute educational sessions over 2 weeks delivered to the highest three telemetry using services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five providers received the educational intervention (78% CNPs and physician assistants [PAs] and 22% medical doctors [MDs]) and 272 did not (57% CNPs and PAs and 43% MDs). Only the educational intervention group showed measurable decreases shown by shifts in QI control charts. Decreased usage in the intervention group produced greater cost savings per patient when compared with the control group ($71.98 vs. $60.68), resulting in an estimated total annual cost savings of $94,740.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Educational interventions for inpatient CNPs that reinforce national policies for telemetry discontinuation improve practice efficiency and potentially decrease health care costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":"576-585"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemetry discontinuation education for Nurse Practitioners decreases hospital costs-A quality-improvement project.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Rodriguez, Nicole Bianco, Theresa Bucco, Karen Collum, Sharon Patricia O'Neill, Daniel David\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JXX.0000000000001062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite updated American Heart Association guidelines, interventions designed to reduce telemetry misuse are uncommon.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>There was a systemic failure within the institution to adopt the most recent guidelines, resulting in poor use of resources and downstream costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Case-control. Pre-post educational intervention, quality-improvement (QI) project in an urban academic cancer institution. Baseline telemetry usage was observed in 2,984 nonintensive inpatients in 21 hospital services over 6 months. Outcome measures were weekly telemetry usage in total minutes and cost savings based on a cost-predicted algorithm. Performance was compared between the intervention group and a control group for 3 months. Measures were compared using QI control charts and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Three high-using telemetry services primarily staffed by certified nurse practitioners (CNPs) were provided with a telemetry education intervention. The intervention consisted of four ten-minute educational sessions over 2 weeks delivered to the highest three telemetry using services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five providers received the educational intervention (78% CNPs and physician assistants [PAs] and 22% medical doctors [MDs]) and 272 did not (57% CNPs and PAs and 43% MDs). Only the educational intervention group showed measurable decreases shown by shifts in QI control charts. Decreased usage in the intervention group produced greater cost savings per patient when compared with the control group ($71.98 vs. $60.68), resulting in an estimated total annual cost savings of $94,740.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Educational interventions for inpatient CNPs that reinforce national policies for telemetry discontinuation improve practice efficiency and potentially decrease health care costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"576-585\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000001062\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000001062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管美国心脏协会更新了指南,但旨在减少遥测技术滥用的干预措施并不常见。当地问题:该机构内部未能系统性地采用最新指南,导致资源利用不善和下游成本增加:方法:病例对照。方法:病例对照,在一家城市癌症学术机构开展教育干预、质量改进(QI)项目。在 6 个月的时间里,对 21 家医院服务机构的 2984 名非重症住院患者的遥测基线使用情况进行了观察。结果指标为每周遥测使用总时长和基于成本预测算法的成本节约。对干预组和对照组 3 个月的绩效进行比较。采用 QI 控制图和推断统计法对测量结果进行比较:三家主要由执业注册护士 (CNP) 负责的高使用率遥测服务机构接受了遥测教育干预。干预措施包括在两周内向使用率最高的三家遥测服务机构提供四次十分钟的教育课程:结果:45 名医疗服务提供者接受了教育干预(其中 78% 为 CNP 和医生助理 [PAs],22% 为医生 [MDs]),272 名医疗服务提供者未接受教育干预(其中 57% 为 CNP 和医生助理 [PAs],43% 为医生 [MDs])。只有教育干预组的用药量出现了可测量的下降,这体现在 QI 控制图的变化上。与对照组相比,干预组使用率的降低为每位患者节省了更多成本(71.98 美元对 60.68 美元),估计每年可节省总成本 94,740 美元:针对住院全科医生的教育干预措施加强了停止遥测的国家政策,提高了实践效率,并有可能降低医疗成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Telemetry discontinuation education for Nurse Practitioners decreases hospital costs-A quality-improvement project.

Background: Despite updated American Heart Association guidelines, interventions designed to reduce telemetry misuse are uncommon.

Local problem: There was a systemic failure within the institution to adopt the most recent guidelines, resulting in poor use of resources and downstream costs.

Methods: Case-control. Pre-post educational intervention, quality-improvement (QI) project in an urban academic cancer institution. Baseline telemetry usage was observed in 2,984 nonintensive inpatients in 21 hospital services over 6 months. Outcome measures were weekly telemetry usage in total minutes and cost savings based on a cost-predicted algorithm. Performance was compared between the intervention group and a control group for 3 months. Measures were compared using QI control charts and inferential statistics.

Intervention: Three high-using telemetry services primarily staffed by certified nurse practitioners (CNPs) were provided with a telemetry education intervention. The intervention consisted of four ten-minute educational sessions over 2 weeks delivered to the highest three telemetry using services.

Results: Forty-five providers received the educational intervention (78% CNPs and physician assistants [PAs] and 22% medical doctors [MDs]) and 272 did not (57% CNPs and PAs and 43% MDs). Only the educational intervention group showed measurable decreases shown by shifts in QI control charts. Decreased usage in the intervention group produced greater cost savings per patient when compared with the control group ($71.98 vs. $60.68), resulting in an estimated total annual cost savings of $94,740.

Conclusions: Educational interventions for inpatient CNPs that reinforce national policies for telemetry discontinuation improve practice efficiency and potentially decrease health care costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
172
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.
期刊最新文献
A case study of hypophosphatasia: An underdiagnosed bone disorder characterized by low alkaline phosphatase. Integration of point-of-care ultrasound in a nurse practitioner-led heart failure clinic. Illness perceptions and blood pressure control among hypertensive Filipino Americans: A cross-sectional study. Comparing health care outcomes before and after employing nurse practitioners in cardiovascular hospitals in Japan: A retrospective chart review. Enhancing nurse practitioner research through reflexivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1