Steven Squires, Alistair Mackenzie, Dafydd Gareth Evans, Sacha J Howell, Susan M Astley
{"title":"深度学习模型对低剂量乳房 X 光照片进行密度预测的能力和可靠性。","authors":"Steven Squires, Alistair Mackenzie, Dafydd Gareth Evans, Sacha J Howell, Susan M Astley","doi":"10.1117/1.JMI.11.4.044506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast density is associated with the risk of developing cancer and can be automatically estimated using deep learning models from digital mammograms. Our aim is to evaluate the capacity and reliability of such models to predict density from low-dose mammograms taken to enable risk estimates for younger women.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We trained deep learning models on standard-dose and simulated low-dose mammograms. The models were then tested on a mammography dataset with paired standard- and low-dose images. The effect of different factors (including age, density, and dose ratio) on the differences between predictions on standard and low doses is analyzed. Methods to improve performance are assessed, and factors that reduce the model quality are demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We showed that, although many factors have no significant effect on the quality of low-dose density prediction, both density and breast area have an impact. The correlation between density predictions on low- and standard-dose images of breasts with the largest breast area is 0.985 (0.949 to 0.995), whereas that with the smallest is 0.882 (0.697 to 0.961). We also demonstrated that averaging across craniocaudal-mediolateral oblique (CC-MLO) images and across repeatedly trained models can improve predictive performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-dose mammography can be used to produce density and risk estimates that are comparable to standard-dose images. Averaging across CC-MLO and model predictions should improve this performance. The model quality is reduced when making predictions on denser and smaller breasts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging","volume":"11 4","pages":"044506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11301609/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capability and reliability of deep learning models to make density predictions on low-dose mammograms.\",\"authors\":\"Steven Squires, Alistair Mackenzie, Dafydd Gareth Evans, Sacha J Howell, Susan M Astley\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/1.JMI.11.4.044506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast density is associated with the risk of developing cancer and can be automatically estimated using deep learning models from digital mammograms. Our aim is to evaluate the capacity and reliability of such models to predict density from low-dose mammograms taken to enable risk estimates for younger women.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We trained deep learning models on standard-dose and simulated low-dose mammograms. The models were then tested on a mammography dataset with paired standard- and low-dose images. The effect of different factors (including age, density, and dose ratio) on the differences between predictions on standard and low doses is analyzed. Methods to improve performance are assessed, and factors that reduce the model quality are demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We showed that, although many factors have no significant effect on the quality of low-dose density prediction, both density and breast area have an impact. The correlation between density predictions on low- and standard-dose images of breasts with the largest breast area is 0.985 (0.949 to 0.995), whereas that with the smallest is 0.882 (0.697 to 0.961). We also demonstrated that averaging across craniocaudal-mediolateral oblique (CC-MLO) images and across repeatedly trained models can improve predictive performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-dose mammography can be used to produce density and risk estimates that are comparable to standard-dose images. Averaging across CC-MLO and model predictions should improve this performance. The model quality is reduced when making predictions on denser and smaller breasts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"044506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11301609/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.11.4.044506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.11.4.044506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:乳房密度与罹患癌症的风险有关,可以使用深度学习模型从数字乳房X光照片中自动估算出乳房密度。我们的目的是评估此类模型预测低剂量乳房 X 光照片密度的能力和可靠性,以便对年轻女性进行风险估计:我们在标准剂量和模拟低剂量乳房 X 光照片上训练了深度学习模型。然后在标准剂量和低剂量图像配对的乳房 X 射线照相数据集上对模型进行测试。分析了不同因素(包括年龄、密度和剂量比)对标准剂量和低剂量预测差异的影响。评估了提高性能的方法,并展示了降低模型质量的因素:结果:我们发现,虽然很多因素对低剂量密度预测的质量没有显著影响,但密度和乳房面积都有影响。乳房面积最大的乳房在低剂量和标准剂量图像上的密度预测相关性为 0.985(0.949 至 0.995),而乳房面积最小的乳房在低剂量和标准剂量图像上的密度预测相关性为 0.882(0.697 至 0.961)。我们还证明,在颅尾-中间偏斜(CC-MLO)图像和反复训练的模型之间进行平均,可以提高预测性能:结论:低剂量乳腺 X 射线照相术可产生与标准剂量图像相当的密度和风险估计值。CC-MLO和模型预测的平均值应能提高这一性能。对密度较高和较小的乳房进行预测时,模型质量会下降。
Capability and reliability of deep learning models to make density predictions on low-dose mammograms.
Purpose: Breast density is associated with the risk of developing cancer and can be automatically estimated using deep learning models from digital mammograms. Our aim is to evaluate the capacity and reliability of such models to predict density from low-dose mammograms taken to enable risk estimates for younger women.
Approach: We trained deep learning models on standard-dose and simulated low-dose mammograms. The models were then tested on a mammography dataset with paired standard- and low-dose images. The effect of different factors (including age, density, and dose ratio) on the differences between predictions on standard and low doses is analyzed. Methods to improve performance are assessed, and factors that reduce the model quality are demonstrated.
Results: We showed that, although many factors have no significant effect on the quality of low-dose density prediction, both density and breast area have an impact. The correlation between density predictions on low- and standard-dose images of breasts with the largest breast area is 0.985 (0.949 to 0.995), whereas that with the smallest is 0.882 (0.697 to 0.961). We also demonstrated that averaging across craniocaudal-mediolateral oblique (CC-MLO) images and across repeatedly trained models can improve predictive performance.
Conclusions: Low-dose mammography can be used to produce density and risk estimates that are comparable to standard-dose images. Averaging across CC-MLO and model predictions should improve this performance. The model quality is reduced when making predictions on denser and smaller breasts.
期刊介绍:
JMI covers fundamental and translational research, as well as applications, focused on medical imaging, which continue to yield physical and biomedical advancements in the early detection, diagnostics, and therapy of disease as well as in the understanding of normal. The scope of JMI includes: Imaging physics, Tomographic reconstruction algorithms (such as those in CT and MRI), Image processing and deep learning, Computer-aided diagnosis and quantitative image analysis, Visualization and modeling, Picture archiving and communications systems (PACS), Image perception and observer performance, Technology assessment, Ultrasonic imaging, Image-guided procedures, Digital pathology, Biomedical applications of biomedical imaging. JMI allows for the peer-reviewed communication and archiving of scientific developments, translational and clinical applications, reviews, and recommendations for the field.