早产的代际关联:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.17924
Abdulbasit Seid, Miranda S Cumpston, Kedir Y Ahmed, Habtamu Mellie Bizuayehu, Subash Thapa, Teketo Kassaw Tegegne, Abel F Dadi, Daniel Bogale Odo, Desalegn Markos Shifti, Sewunet Admasu Belachew, Getiye Dejenu Kibret, Daniel Bekele Ketema, Zemenu Yohannes Kassa, Erkihun Amsalu, Meless G Bore, Tahir Ahmed Hassen
{"title":"早产的代际关联:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Abdulbasit Seid, Miranda S Cumpston, Kedir Y Ahmed, Habtamu Mellie Bizuayehu, Subash Thapa, Teketo Kassaw Tegegne, Abel F Dadi, Daniel Bogale Odo, Desalegn Markos Shifti, Sewunet Admasu Belachew, Getiye Dejenu Kibret, Daniel Bekele Ketema, Zemenu Yohannes Kassa, Erkihun Amsalu, Meless G Bore, Tahir Ahmed Hassen","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Around half of preterm births lack identifiable causes, indicating the need for further investigation to understand preterm birth risk factors. Existing studies on the intergenerational association of preterm birth showed inconsistency in effect size and direction.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to review existing studies and provide comprehensive evidence on the intergenerational association of preterm births.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Maternity and Infant Care databases, from the inception of each database to 04 April 2024.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Eligibility criteria included studies that reported on women who had given birth and had recorded information about a family history of preterm birth in one or both of the child's biological parents.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. A random-effects model was used to compute pooled estimates using odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Sixteen eligible studies with a total of 2 271 612 mothers were included. The findings indicated a 1.44 (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.34, 1.54) fold increase in odds of giving preterm births among women who were born preterm. Additionally, having a sibling born preterm (OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.87) and having a partner born preterm (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.25) were associated with increased likelihood of giving preterm births among women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed that women with a family history of preterm birth face an increased risk of giving preterm births. Screening pregnant women for a family history of preterm birth is essential, with those having a positive family history requiring closer follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The intergenerational association of preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulbasit Seid, Miranda S Cumpston, Kedir Y Ahmed, Habtamu Mellie Bizuayehu, Subash Thapa, Teketo Kassaw Tegegne, Abel F Dadi, Daniel Bogale Odo, Desalegn Markos Shifti, Sewunet Admasu Belachew, Getiye Dejenu Kibret, Daniel Bekele Ketema, Zemenu Yohannes Kassa, Erkihun Amsalu, Meless G Bore, Tahir Ahmed Hassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.17924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Around half of preterm births lack identifiable causes, indicating the need for further investigation to understand preterm birth risk factors. Existing studies on the intergenerational association of preterm birth showed inconsistency in effect size and direction.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to review existing studies and provide comprehensive evidence on the intergenerational association of preterm births.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Maternity and Infant Care databases, from the inception of each database to 04 April 2024.</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Eligibility criteria included studies that reported on women who had given birth and had recorded information about a family history of preterm birth in one or both of the child's biological parents.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. A random-effects model was used to compute pooled estimates using odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Sixteen eligible studies with a total of 2 271 612 mothers were included. The findings indicated a 1.44 (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.34, 1.54) fold increase in odds of giving preterm births among women who were born preterm. Additionally, having a sibling born preterm (OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.87) and having a partner born preterm (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.25) were associated with increased likelihood of giving preterm births among women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed that women with a family history of preterm birth face an increased risk of giving preterm births. Screening pregnant women for a family history of preterm birth is essential, with those having a positive family history requiring closer follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17924\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17924","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:约有一半的早产缺乏可确定的原因,这表明需要进一步调查以了解早产的风险因素。现有关于早产代际关联的研究在效应大小和方向上存在不一致性:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在回顾现有研究,为早产的代际关联提供全面证据:检索策略:我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和母婴护理数据库,检索时间从各数据库建立之初至 2024 年 4 月 4 日:资格标准包括对分娩妇女进行报道的研究,这些研究记录了孩子的亲生父母一方或双方有早产家族史的信息:数据由两名独立审查员提取。采用随机效应模型,使用几率比计算汇总估计值:主要结果:16 项符合条件的研究共纳入了 2 271 612 名母亲。研究结果表明,早产妇女的早产几率增加了 1.44 倍(OR = 1.44,95% CI:1.34,1.54)。此外,有早产兄弟姐妹(OR = 1.53,95% CI:1.24,1.87)和有早产伴侣(OR = 1.12,95% CI:1.01,1.25)的妇女早产的可能性也会增加:这项研究表明,有早产家族史的妇女早产的风险更高。对有早产家族史的孕妇进行筛查是非常必要的,有阳性家族史的孕妇需要更密切的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The intergenerational association of preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Around half of preterm births lack identifiable causes, indicating the need for further investigation to understand preterm birth risk factors. Existing studies on the intergenerational association of preterm birth showed inconsistency in effect size and direction.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to review existing studies and provide comprehensive evidence on the intergenerational association of preterm births.

Search strategy: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Maternity and Infant Care databases, from the inception of each database to 04 April 2024.

Selection criteria: Eligibility criteria included studies that reported on women who had given birth and had recorded information about a family history of preterm birth in one or both of the child's biological parents.

Data collection and analysis: Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. A random-effects model was used to compute pooled estimates using odds ratios.

Main results: Sixteen eligible studies with a total of 2 271 612 mothers were included. The findings indicated a 1.44 (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.34, 1.54) fold increase in odds of giving preterm births among women who were born preterm. Additionally, having a sibling born preterm (OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.87) and having a partner born preterm (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.25) were associated with increased likelihood of giving preterm births among women.

Conclusion: The study revealed that women with a family history of preterm birth face an increased risk of giving preterm births. Screening pregnant women for a family history of preterm birth is essential, with those having a positive family history requiring closer follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Trustworthiness criteria for meta-analyses of randomized controlled studies: OBGYN journal guidelines. Recurrence of Severe Maternal Morbidity and Transfusion During Delivery Hospitalisations: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Pre-Pregnancy Chronic Conditions: Mental Health is a Burgeoning Problem. Prevention of Intrauterine Adhesions: The Way to Go. Role of Child Marriage and Adolescent Childbearing on Hysterectomy Among Married Women in India: A Cross-Sectional and Time-to-Event Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1