Aaron Hengist, Christina M. Sciarrillo, Juen Guo, Mary Walter, Kevin D. Hall
{"title":"源自肠道的食欲激素无法解释人类在低碳水化合物饮食和低脂肪饮食之间的能量摄入差异。","authors":"Aaron Hengist, Christina M. Sciarrillo, Juen Guo, Mary Walter, Kevin D. Hall","doi":"10.1002/oby.24104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study was to explore how dietary macronutrient composition influences postprandial appetite hormone responses and subsequent energy intake.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 20 adults (mean [SEM], age 30 [1] years, BMI 27.8 [1.3] kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>n</i> = 8 with normal weight, <i>n</i> = 6 with overweight, <i>n</i> = 6 with obesity) consumed a low-fat (LF) diet (10% fat, 75% carbohydrate) and a low-carbohydrate (LC) diet (10% carbohydrate, 75% fat) for 2 weeks each in an inpatient randomized crossover design. At the end of each diet, participants consumed isocaloric macronutrient-representative breakfast test meals, and 6-h postprandial responses were measured. Ad libitum energy intake was measured for the rest of the day.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The LC meal resulted in greater mean postprandial plasma active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1; LC: 6.44 [0.78] pg/mL, LF: 2.46 [0.26] pg/mL; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), total glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP; LC: 578 [60] pg/mL, LF: 319 [37] pg/mL; <i>p</i> = 0.0004), and peptide YY (PYY; LC: 65.6 [5.6] pg/mL, LF: 50.7 [3.8] pg/mL; <i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas total ghrelin (LC: 184 [25] pg/mL, LF: 261 [47] pg/mL; <i>p</i> = 0.0009), active ghrelin (LC: 91 [9] pg/mL, LF: 232 [28] pg/mL; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and leptin (LC: 26.9 [6.5] ng/mL, LF: 35.2 [7.5] ng/mL; <i>p</i> = 0.01) were lower compared with LF. Participants ate more during LC at lunch (244 [85] kcal; <i>p</i> = 0.01) and dinner (193 [86] kcal; <i>p</i> = 0.04), increasing total subsequent energy intake for the day compared with LF (551 [103] kcal; <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In the short term, endogenous gut-derived appetite hormones do not necessarily determine ad libitum energy intake.</p>\n \n <div>\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":215,"journal":{"name":"Obesity","volume":"32 9","pages":"1689-1698"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oby.24104","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gut-derived appetite hormones do not explain energy intake differences in humans following low-carbohydrate versus low-fat diets\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Hengist, Christina M. Sciarrillo, Juen Guo, Mary Walter, Kevin D. Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/oby.24104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The objective of this study was to explore how dietary macronutrient composition influences postprandial appetite hormone responses and subsequent energy intake.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 20 adults (mean [SEM], age 30 [1] years, BMI 27.8 [1.3] kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>n</i> = 8 with normal weight, <i>n</i> = 6 with overweight, <i>n</i> = 6 with obesity) consumed a low-fat (LF) diet (10% fat, 75% carbohydrate) and a low-carbohydrate (LC) diet (10% carbohydrate, 75% fat) for 2 weeks each in an inpatient randomized crossover design. At the end of each diet, participants consumed isocaloric macronutrient-representative breakfast test meals, and 6-h postprandial responses were measured. Ad libitum energy intake was measured for the rest of the day.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The LC meal resulted in greater mean postprandial plasma active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1; LC: 6.44 [0.78] pg/mL, LF: 2.46 [0.26] pg/mL; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), total glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP; LC: 578 [60] pg/mL, LF: 319 [37] pg/mL; <i>p</i> = 0.0004), and peptide YY (PYY; LC: 65.6 [5.6] pg/mL, LF: 50.7 [3.8] pg/mL; <i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas total ghrelin (LC: 184 [25] pg/mL, LF: 261 [47] pg/mL; <i>p</i> = 0.0009), active ghrelin (LC: 91 [9] pg/mL, LF: 232 [28] pg/mL; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and leptin (LC: 26.9 [6.5] ng/mL, LF: 35.2 [7.5] ng/mL; <i>p</i> = 0.01) were lower compared with LF. Participants ate more during LC at lunch (244 [85] kcal; <i>p</i> = 0.01) and dinner (193 [86] kcal; <i>p</i> = 0.04), increasing total subsequent energy intake for the day compared with LF (551 [103] kcal; <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the short term, endogenous gut-derived appetite hormones do not necessarily determine ad libitum energy intake.</p>\\n \\n <div>\\n <figure>\\n <div><picture>\\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\\n </div>\\n </figure>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity\",\"volume\":\"32 9\",\"pages\":\"1689-1698\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oby.24104\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.24104\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.24104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gut-derived appetite hormones do not explain energy intake differences in humans following low-carbohydrate versus low-fat diets
Objective
The objective of this study was to explore how dietary macronutrient composition influences postprandial appetite hormone responses and subsequent energy intake.
Methods
A total of 20 adults (mean [SEM], age 30 [1] years, BMI 27.8 [1.3] kg/m2, n = 8 with normal weight, n = 6 with overweight, n = 6 with obesity) consumed a low-fat (LF) diet (10% fat, 75% carbohydrate) and a low-carbohydrate (LC) diet (10% carbohydrate, 75% fat) for 2 weeks each in an inpatient randomized crossover design. At the end of each diet, participants consumed isocaloric macronutrient-representative breakfast test meals, and 6-h postprandial responses were measured. Ad libitum energy intake was measured for the rest of the day.
Results
The LC meal resulted in greater mean postprandial plasma active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1; LC: 6.44 [0.78] pg/mL, LF: 2.46 [0.26] pg/mL; p < 0.0001), total glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP; LC: 578 [60] pg/mL, LF: 319 [37] pg/mL; p = 0.0004), and peptide YY (PYY; LC: 65.6 [5.6] pg/mL, LF: 50.7 [3.8] pg/mL; p = 0.02), whereas total ghrelin (LC: 184 [25] pg/mL, LF: 261 [47] pg/mL; p = 0.0009), active ghrelin (LC: 91 [9] pg/mL, LF: 232 [28] pg/mL; p < 0.0001), and leptin (LC: 26.9 [6.5] ng/mL, LF: 35.2 [7.5] ng/mL; p = 0.01) were lower compared with LF. Participants ate more during LC at lunch (244 [85] kcal; p = 0.01) and dinner (193 [86] kcal; p = 0.04), increasing total subsequent energy intake for the day compared with LF (551 [103] kcal; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
In the short term, endogenous gut-derived appetite hormones do not necessarily determine ad libitum energy intake.
期刊介绍:
Obesity is the official journal of The Obesity Society and is the premier source of information for increasing knowledge, fostering translational research from basic to population science, and promoting better treatment for people with obesity. Obesity publishes important peer-reviewed research and cutting-edge reviews, commentaries, and public health and medical developments.