大学男女应对 COVID-19 大流行的机制差异。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Issues in Mental Health Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1080/01612840.2024.2370929
Margaret E Tasket, Allyson M Neal
{"title":"大学男女应对 COVID-19 大流行的机制差异。","authors":"Margaret E Tasket, Allyson M Neal","doi":"10.1080/01612840.2024.2370929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study's purpose is to examine the differences between how men and women use cognitive coping mechanisms in stressful situations, specifically the COVID-19 pandemic. Research suggests that men and women cope with stress differently. Women tend to have a more emotional response to stressors and are expected to spend more time discussing issues with family and friends. Men are socialized for problem-focused coping. Only using problem-focused coping can be problematic when the cause of the stress cannot be changed by the individual. A secondary goal of this study was to evaluate other factors that affected cognitive coping, such as knowing someone who died of COVID-19. Participants ages 18-24 were invited to take part in an online survey evaluating cognitive coping mechanisms. After analysis, we found that in many ways men and women cognitively coped similarly. More often, women use a wider range of coping strategies except for self-blame and other blame. The participants used the coping mechanisms at significantly higher levels than adults during pre-pandemic times. Knowing someone who died of COVID-19 correlated with statistically significantly higher usage of several coping mechanisms. Understanding young adults' cognitive coping during high-stress scenarios can uncover solutions to improved mental health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14664,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"1090-1096"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences between College Males and Females' Coping Mechanisms in Relation to the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Margaret E Tasket, Allyson M Neal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01612840.2024.2370929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study's purpose is to examine the differences between how men and women use cognitive coping mechanisms in stressful situations, specifically the COVID-19 pandemic. Research suggests that men and women cope with stress differently. Women tend to have a more emotional response to stressors and are expected to spend more time discussing issues with family and friends. Men are socialized for problem-focused coping. Only using problem-focused coping can be problematic when the cause of the stress cannot be changed by the individual. A secondary goal of this study was to evaluate other factors that affected cognitive coping, such as knowing someone who died of COVID-19. Participants ages 18-24 were invited to take part in an online survey evaluating cognitive coping mechanisms. After analysis, we found that in many ways men and women cognitively coped similarly. More often, women use a wider range of coping strategies except for self-blame and other blame. The participants used the coping mechanisms at significantly higher levels than adults during pre-pandemic times. Knowing someone who died of COVID-19 correlated with statistically significantly higher usage of several coping mechanisms. Understanding young adults' cognitive coping during high-stress scenarios can uncover solutions to improved mental health care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues in Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1090-1096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues in Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2024.2370929\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2024.2370929","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨男性和女性在压力情况下(特别是 COVID-19 大流行病)使用认知应对机制的差异。研究表明,男性和女性应对压力的方式不同。女性对压力的反应往往更加情绪化,并会花更多时间与家人和朋友讨论问题。而男性则是社会化的以问题为中心的应对方式。如果个人无法改变造成压力的原因,那么只采用以问题为中心的应对方法就会产生问题。本研究的第二个目标是评估影响认知应对的其他因素,例如是否认识死于 COVID-19 的人。我们邀请 18-24 岁的参与者参加一项在线调查,对认知应对机制进行评估。经过分析,我们发现男性和女性在许多方面的认知应对方式相似。除了自责和他责之外,女性使用的应对策略更为广泛。在大流行前,参与者使用应对机制的水平明显高于成年人。认识死于 COVID-19 的人与几种应对机制的使用率有显著的统计学相关性。了解青壮年在高压力情景下的认知应对方式,可以找到改善心理健康护理的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences between College Males and Females' Coping Mechanisms in Relation to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

This study's purpose is to examine the differences between how men and women use cognitive coping mechanisms in stressful situations, specifically the COVID-19 pandemic. Research suggests that men and women cope with stress differently. Women tend to have a more emotional response to stressors and are expected to spend more time discussing issues with family and friends. Men are socialized for problem-focused coping. Only using problem-focused coping can be problematic when the cause of the stress cannot be changed by the individual. A secondary goal of this study was to evaluate other factors that affected cognitive coping, such as knowing someone who died of COVID-19. Participants ages 18-24 were invited to take part in an online survey evaluating cognitive coping mechanisms. After analysis, we found that in many ways men and women cognitively coped similarly. More often, women use a wider range of coping strategies except for self-blame and other blame. The participants used the coping mechanisms at significantly higher levels than adults during pre-pandemic times. Knowing someone who died of COVID-19 correlated with statistically significantly higher usage of several coping mechanisms. Understanding young adults' cognitive coping during high-stress scenarios can uncover solutions to improved mental health care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Issues in Mental Health Nursing NURSINGPSYCHIATRY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Issues in Mental Health Nursing is a refereed journal designed to expand psychiatric and mental health nursing knowledge. It deals with new, innovative approaches to client care, in-depth analysis of current issues, and empirical research. Because clinical research is the primary vehicle for the development of nursing science, the journal presents data-based articles on nursing care provision to clients of all ages in a variety of community and institutional settings. Additionally, the journal publishes theoretical papers and manuscripts addressing mental health promotion, public policy concerns, and educational preparation of mental health nurses. International contributions are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Acculturation Impacts on Depressive Symptoms Among Hispanic Sexual Minority Youth and Hispanic Non-sexual Minority Youth. To Seclude or Not to Seclude? Using Grounded Theory to Develop a Model of the Seclusion Decision-Making Process Used by Mental Health Nurses in Forensic Services. Family Perspectives on Stigma Toward Women Who Use Drugs in Tanzania. Visitation Restrictions in Inpatient Psychiatric Settings: A Call for Connected Healing. The Impact of a Mental Health Community Symposium on Nursing Students' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Mental Illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1