{"title":"从真实世界数据集中对小肠癌进行基因组剖析,发现具有可操作改变的亚组。","authors":"Hiroyuki Takeda, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Ritsuko Oikawa, Kumiko Umemoto, Hiroyuki Arai, Takuro Mizukami, Kazuki Ogawa, Yoshiyasu Uchida, Yusuke Nagata, Yohei Kubota, Ayako Doi, Yoshiki Horie, Takashi Ogura, Naoki Izawa, Jay A Moore, Ethan S Sokol, Yu Sunakawa","doi":"10.1200/PO.23.00425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Panel-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is used in clinical practice worldwide; however, large real-world data (RWD) of patients with advanced small intestine cancer have not been characterized. We investigated differences in the prevalence of clinically relevant alterations across molecularly defined or age-stratified subgroups.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a collaborative biomarker study of RWD from CGP testing (Foundation Medicine, Inc). Hybrid capture was conducted on at least 324 cancer-related genes and select introns from up to 31 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. Overall, 1,364 patients with advanced small intestine cancer were available for analyses and were stratified by age (≥40 years/<40 years), microsatellite instability (MSI) status, tumor mutational burden (TMB) status (high ≥10/low <10 Muts/Mb), and select gene alterations. The frequency of alterations was analyzed using a chi-square test with Yate's correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Genes with frequent alterations included <i>TP53</i> (59.8%), <i>KRAS</i> (54.8%), <i>APC</i> (27.7%), and <i>CDKN2A</i> (22.4%). Frequent genes with amplifications were <i>MYC</i> (6.7%), <i>MDM2</i> (5.9%), <i>GATA6</i> (5.5%), and <i>CCND1</i> (3.4%). Patients younger than 40 years had significantly lower frequency of <i>APC</i> mutations than those 40 years and older (10.4% <i>v</i> 28.7%; <i>P</i> = .0008). Druggable genomic alterations were detected in 22.3% of patients: <i>BRAF</i> V600E (1.2%), <i>BRCA1</i> (1.8%), <i>BRCA2</i> (3.2%), <i>ERBB2</i> amplification (3.2%), <i>KRAS</i> G12C (3.3%), <i>NTRK1/2/3</i> fusion (0.07%), MSI-high (7.0%), and TMB-high (12.2%), with no significant differences in the frequency according to age (<40 years <i>v</i> ≥40 years; 22.1% <i>v</i> 22.3%). TMB of 10-20 Mut/Mb was observed in 4.8% of patients, and TMB ≥20 Mut/Mb was seen in 7.3% of the cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RWD from clinical panel testing revealed the genomic landscape in small intestine cancer by subgroup. These findings provide insights for the future development of treatments in advanced small intestine cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2300425"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomic Profiling of Small Intestine Cancers From a Real-World Data Set Identifies Subgroups With Actionable Alterations.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroyuki Takeda, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Ritsuko Oikawa, Kumiko Umemoto, Hiroyuki Arai, Takuro Mizukami, Kazuki Ogawa, Yoshiyasu Uchida, Yusuke Nagata, Yohei Kubota, Ayako Doi, Yoshiki Horie, Takashi Ogura, Naoki Izawa, Jay A Moore, Ethan S Sokol, Yu Sunakawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO.23.00425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Panel-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is used in clinical practice worldwide; however, large real-world data (RWD) of patients with advanced small intestine cancer have not been characterized. We investigated differences in the prevalence of clinically relevant alterations across molecularly defined or age-stratified subgroups.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a collaborative biomarker study of RWD from CGP testing (Foundation Medicine, Inc). Hybrid capture was conducted on at least 324 cancer-related genes and select introns from up to 31 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. Overall, 1,364 patients with advanced small intestine cancer were available for analyses and were stratified by age (≥40 years/<40 years), microsatellite instability (MSI) status, tumor mutational burden (TMB) status (high ≥10/low <10 Muts/Mb), and select gene alterations. The frequency of alterations was analyzed using a chi-square test with Yate's correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Genes with frequent alterations included <i>TP53</i> (59.8%), <i>KRAS</i> (54.8%), <i>APC</i> (27.7%), and <i>CDKN2A</i> (22.4%). Frequent genes with amplifications were <i>MYC</i> (6.7%), <i>MDM2</i> (5.9%), <i>GATA6</i> (5.5%), and <i>CCND1</i> (3.4%). Patients younger than 40 years had significantly lower frequency of <i>APC</i> mutations than those 40 years and older (10.4% <i>v</i> 28.7%; <i>P</i> = .0008). Druggable genomic alterations were detected in 22.3% of patients: <i>BRAF</i> V600E (1.2%), <i>BRCA1</i> (1.8%), <i>BRCA2</i> (3.2%), <i>ERBB2</i> amplification (3.2%), <i>KRAS</i> G12C (3.3%), <i>NTRK1/2/3</i> fusion (0.07%), MSI-high (7.0%), and TMB-high (12.2%), with no significant differences in the frequency according to age (<40 years <i>v</i> ≥40 years; 22.1% <i>v</i> 22.3%). TMB of 10-20 Mut/Mb was observed in 4.8% of patients, and TMB ≥20 Mut/Mb was seen in 7.3% of the cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RWD from clinical panel testing revealed the genomic landscape in small intestine cancer by subgroup. These findings provide insights for the future development of treatments in advanced small intestine cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e2300425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.23.00425\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.23.00425","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genomic Profiling of Small Intestine Cancers From a Real-World Data Set Identifies Subgroups With Actionable Alterations.
Purpose: Panel-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is used in clinical practice worldwide; however, large real-world data (RWD) of patients with advanced small intestine cancer have not been characterized. We investigated differences in the prevalence of clinically relevant alterations across molecularly defined or age-stratified subgroups.
Patients and methods: This was a collaborative biomarker study of RWD from CGP testing (Foundation Medicine, Inc). Hybrid capture was conducted on at least 324 cancer-related genes and select introns from up to 31 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. Overall, 1,364 patients with advanced small intestine cancer were available for analyses and were stratified by age (≥40 years/<40 years), microsatellite instability (MSI) status, tumor mutational burden (TMB) status (high ≥10/low <10 Muts/Mb), and select gene alterations. The frequency of alterations was analyzed using a chi-square test with Yate's correction.
Results: Genes with frequent alterations included TP53 (59.8%), KRAS (54.8%), APC (27.7%), and CDKN2A (22.4%). Frequent genes with amplifications were MYC (6.7%), MDM2 (5.9%), GATA6 (5.5%), and CCND1 (3.4%). Patients younger than 40 years had significantly lower frequency of APC mutations than those 40 years and older (10.4% v 28.7%; P = .0008). Druggable genomic alterations were detected in 22.3% of patients: BRAF V600E (1.2%), BRCA1 (1.8%), BRCA2 (3.2%), ERBB2 amplification (3.2%), KRAS G12C (3.3%), NTRK1/2/3 fusion (0.07%), MSI-high (7.0%), and TMB-high (12.2%), with no significant differences in the frequency according to age (<40 years v ≥40 years; 22.1% v 22.3%). TMB of 10-20 Mut/Mb was observed in 4.8% of patients, and TMB ≥20 Mut/Mb was seen in 7.3% of the cohort.
Conclusion: RWD from clinical panel testing revealed the genomic landscape in small intestine cancer by subgroup. These findings provide insights for the future development of treatments in advanced small intestine cancer.