M. Antonia Biggs , Katherine Ehrenreich , Natalie Morris , Lela Bachrach , Jesus Crespin , Daniel Grossman
{"title":"年轻人对提前提供药物流产模式的支持和个人兴趣。","authors":"M. Antonia Biggs , Katherine Ehrenreich , Natalie Morris , Lela Bachrach , Jesus Crespin , Daniel Grossman","doi":"10.1016/j.jpag.2024.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess young people's interest in advance provision (AP) of medication abortion—receiving mifepristone and misoprostol from a clinician in advance for their future use.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From November 2022-August 2023 we administered an electronic survey regarding advance provision to patients assigned female at birth at four Bay Area youth-serving clinics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 152 people ages 14-24 years (mean 17.9) surveyed, 73.7% (95% CI, 65.9%-80.5%) supported and 46.1% (95% CI, 37.9%-54.3%) were interested in the AP model. AP interest was higher among people who experienced three or more difficulties trying to access reproductive healthcare (70.6% [95% CI, 44.0%-89.7%]) and who experienced food or housing insecurity (60.3% [95% CI, 46.6%-73.0%]). Most youth (81.6%) had a safe place to store the pills for later use; this proportion was significantly higher among people ages 18-24 years (88.5%) than teens ages 14-17 years (74.3%, <em>P</em> = .025). The most common perceived advantages of AP included being able to have the abortion earlier in pregnancy (61.8%), privacy (57.9%) and convenience (50.7%). Common disadvantages noted included concern that people might take the pills incorrectly (50.0%) or lose the pills (40.1%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Young people have considerable interest in AP of medication abortion. Further research is needed to document the AP model's feasibility, clinical outcomes, and effect on access for adolescents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16708,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology","volume":"37 6","pages":"Pages 614-618"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Young People's Support for and Personal Interest in an Advance Provision Model for Medication Abortion\",\"authors\":\"M. Antonia Biggs , Katherine Ehrenreich , Natalie Morris , Lela Bachrach , Jesus Crespin , Daniel Grossman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpag.2024.07.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess young people's interest in advance provision (AP) of medication abortion—receiving mifepristone and misoprostol from a clinician in advance for their future use.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From November 2022-August 2023 we administered an electronic survey regarding advance provision to patients assigned female at birth at four Bay Area youth-serving clinics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 152 people ages 14-24 years (mean 17.9) surveyed, 73.7% (95% CI, 65.9%-80.5%) supported and 46.1% (95% CI, 37.9%-54.3%) were interested in the AP model. AP interest was higher among people who experienced three or more difficulties trying to access reproductive healthcare (70.6% [95% CI, 44.0%-89.7%]) and who experienced food or housing insecurity (60.3% [95% CI, 46.6%-73.0%]). Most youth (81.6%) had a safe place to store the pills for later use; this proportion was significantly higher among people ages 18-24 years (88.5%) than teens ages 14-17 years (74.3%, <em>P</em> = .025). The most common perceived advantages of AP included being able to have the abortion earlier in pregnancy (61.8%), privacy (57.9%) and convenience (50.7%). Common disadvantages noted included concern that people might take the pills incorrectly (50.0%) or lose the pills (40.1%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Young people have considerable interest in AP of medication abortion. Further research is needed to document the AP model's feasibility, clinical outcomes, and effect on access for adolescents.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology\",\"volume\":\"37 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 614-618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1083318824002638\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1083318824002638","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估年轻人对提前提供药物流产(AP)的兴趣--提前从临床医生处获得米非司酮和米索前列醇,以供将来使用:方法:2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 8 月,我们在湾区四家为青少年服务的诊所对出生时被分配为女性的患者进行了有关提前提供药物流产的电子调查:在 152 名 14-24 岁(平均 17.9 岁)的受访者中,73.7%(95% CI,65.9%-80.5%)的人支持预产期模式,46.1%(95% CI,65.9%-80.5%)的人对预产期模式感兴趣。在试图获得生殖保健服务时遇到三次或三次以上困难的人[70.6%(95% CI 44.0%,89.7%)]和经历过食物或住房不安全的人[60.3%(95% CI 46.6%,73.0%)]中,对 AP 感兴趣的比例较高。大多数青少年(81.6%)都有一个安全的地方存放药片以备日后使用;这一比例在 18-24 岁人群中(88.5%)明显高于 14-17 岁青少年(74.3%,P=.025)。人们认为堕胎药最常见的优点包括可以在怀孕早期进行堕胎(61.8%)、隐私(57.9%)和方便(50.7%)。常见的缺点包括担心服药不当(50.0%)或药片丢失(40.1%):结论:年轻人对药物流产 AP 相当感兴趣。需要进一步开展研究,记录药物流产 AP 模式的可行性、临床结果以及对青少年获取药物流产的影响。
Young People's Support for and Personal Interest in an Advance Provision Model for Medication Abortion
Purpose
To assess young people's interest in advance provision (AP) of medication abortion—receiving mifepristone and misoprostol from a clinician in advance for their future use.
Methods
From November 2022-August 2023 we administered an electronic survey regarding advance provision to patients assigned female at birth at four Bay Area youth-serving clinics.
Results
Among 152 people ages 14-24 years (mean 17.9) surveyed, 73.7% (95% CI, 65.9%-80.5%) supported and 46.1% (95% CI, 37.9%-54.3%) were interested in the AP model. AP interest was higher among people who experienced three or more difficulties trying to access reproductive healthcare (70.6% [95% CI, 44.0%-89.7%]) and who experienced food or housing insecurity (60.3% [95% CI, 46.6%-73.0%]). Most youth (81.6%) had a safe place to store the pills for later use; this proportion was significantly higher among people ages 18-24 years (88.5%) than teens ages 14-17 years (74.3%, P = .025). The most common perceived advantages of AP included being able to have the abortion earlier in pregnancy (61.8%), privacy (57.9%) and convenience (50.7%). Common disadvantages noted included concern that people might take the pills incorrectly (50.0%) or lose the pills (40.1%).
Conclusions
Young people have considerable interest in AP of medication abortion. Further research is needed to document the AP model's feasibility, clinical outcomes, and effect on access for adolescents.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology includes all aspects of clinical and basic science research in pediatric and adolescent gynecology. The Journal draws on expertise from a variety of disciplines including pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, reproduction and gynecology, reproductive and pediatric endocrinology, genetics, and molecular biology.
The Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology features original studies, review articles, book and literature reviews, letters to the editor, and communications in brief. It is an essential resource for the libraries of OB/GYN specialists, as well as pediatricians and primary care physicians.