NSCLC基因篡改的血统、性别和年龄差异:癌症基因组图谱测试的真实世界数据。

IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2024.7021
Keita Miura, Takehito Shukuya, Ray Greenstein, Ben Kaplan, Heather Wakelee, Kana Kurokawa, Kazuyuki Furuta, Shunsuke Kato, Junghee Suh, Smruthy Sivakumar, Ethan S Sokol, David P Carbone, Kazuhisa Takahashi
{"title":"NSCLC基因篡改的血统、性别和年龄差异:癌症基因组图谱测试的真实世界数据。","authors":"Keita Miura, Takehito Shukuya, Ray Greenstein, Ben Kaplan, Heather Wakelee, Kana Kurokawa, Kazuyuki Furuta, Shunsuke Kato, Junghee Suh, Smruthy Sivakumar, Ethan S Sokol, David P Carbone, Kazuhisa Takahashi","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some genomic alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are known to differ according to race, sex, or age. These studies have been limited in sample size and thus they cannot detect the differences precisely and comprehensively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on 75,362 patients with NSCLC from the United States during routine clinical care. Additionally, we examined data of a Japanese NSCLC cohort with 1,019 patients. In the US cohort, 296 genes were examined for pathogenic alterations. Predominant genetic ancestry was inferred using a SNP-based approach, and patients were categorized into European (EUR), African (AFR), East Asian (EAS), Admixed American (AMR), and South Asian (SAS) ancestry groups. Patients were additionally stratified by histologic type, age (<40/≥40 years, <75/≥75 years), and sex. The prevalence of high tumor mutational burden (TMB-High) and microsatellite instability status was also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stratified by ancestry, EGFR alterations were significantly enriched in EAS versus other ancestry groups. The prevalence of ALK was significantly higher in the AMR, EAS, and SAS patients than in AFR and EUR patients. KRAS and STK11 were enriched in EUR and AFR patients versus other groups. TMB-High was significantly enriched in AFR patients versus all other groups. An analysis based on sex revealed differences in prevalence of alterations in 80 genes and TMB-High status. For example, EGFR, ALK, BRAF, and KRAS alterations were significantly enriched in females, whereas TP53, STK11, KEAP1, and TMB-High were significantly enriched in males. With respect to age, the prevalence of alterations in 41 genes, including ALK, RET, MET, EGFR, STK11, KEAP1, BRAF, and KRAS, as well as TMB-High, were significantly different between patients aged <40 years and those aged ≥40 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comprehensive analysis from a large real-world dataset revealed ancestry-associated differences in genomic alterations in NSCLC. Age- and sex-related differences in prevalence of genomic alterations and TMB-High status were also observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ancestry-, Sex-, and Age-Based Differences of Gene Alterations in NSCLC: From the Real-World Data of Cancer Genomic Profiling Tests.\",\"authors\":\"Keita Miura, Takehito Shukuya, Ray Greenstein, Ben Kaplan, Heather Wakelee, Kana Kurokawa, Kazuyuki Furuta, Shunsuke Kato, Junghee Suh, Smruthy Sivakumar, Ethan S Sokol, David P Carbone, Kazuhisa Takahashi\",\"doi\":\"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some genomic alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are known to differ according to race, sex, or age. These studies have been limited in sample size and thus they cannot detect the differences precisely and comprehensively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on 75,362 patients with NSCLC from the United States during routine clinical care. Additionally, we examined data of a Japanese NSCLC cohort with 1,019 patients. In the US cohort, 296 genes were examined for pathogenic alterations. Predominant genetic ancestry was inferred using a SNP-based approach, and patients were categorized into European (EUR), African (AFR), East Asian (EAS), Admixed American (AMR), and South Asian (SAS) ancestry groups. Patients were additionally stratified by histologic type, age (<40/≥40 years, <75/≥75 years), and sex. The prevalence of high tumor mutational burden (TMB-High) and microsatellite instability status was also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stratified by ancestry, EGFR alterations were significantly enriched in EAS versus other ancestry groups. The prevalence of ALK was significantly higher in the AMR, EAS, and SAS patients than in AFR and EUR patients. KRAS and STK11 were enriched in EUR and AFR patients versus other groups. TMB-High was significantly enriched in AFR patients versus all other groups. An analysis based on sex revealed differences in prevalence of alterations in 80 genes and TMB-High status. For example, EGFR, ALK, BRAF, and KRAS alterations were significantly enriched in females, whereas TP53, STK11, KEAP1, and TMB-High were significantly enriched in males. With respect to age, the prevalence of alterations in 41 genes, including ALK, RET, MET, EGFR, STK11, KEAP1, BRAF, and KRAS, as well as TMB-High, were significantly different between patients aged <40 years and those aged ≥40 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comprehensive analysis from a large real-world dataset revealed ancestry-associated differences in genomic alterations in NSCLC. Age- and sex-related differences in prevalence of genomic alterations and TMB-High status were also observed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:已知非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的某些基因组改变因种族、性别或年龄而异。这些研究的样本量有限,因此无法精确、全面地检测出这些差异:方法:我们对美国 75,362 名接受常规临床治疗的 NSCLC 患者进行了基于组织的综合基因组分析。此外,我们还研究了日本 1,019 名 NSCLC 患者的数据。在美国队列中,我们检测了 296 个基因的致病性改变。我们采用基于 SNP 的方法推断了患者的主要基因血统,并将患者分为欧洲血统 (EUR)、非洲血统 (AFR)、东亚血统 (EAS)、混血美国血统 (AMR) 和南亚血统 (SAS) 组。此外,患者还根据组织学类型、年龄(结果:欧洲人(EUR)、非洲人(AFR)、东亚人(EAS)、混血美国人(AMR)和南亚人(SAS)分层:按血统分层,EAS血统组的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)改变明显多于其他血统组。AMR、EAS和SAS患者的ALK发生率明显高于AFR和EUR患者。KRAS和STK11在EUR和AFR患者中的富集程度高于其他组别。TMB-High在AFR患者中的富集程度明显高于所有其他组别。基于性别的分析显示,80个基因的改变发生率和TMB-High状态存在差异。例如,表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)、ALK、BRAF 和 KRAS 基因改变在女性中明显富集,而 TP53、STK11、KEAP1 和 TMB-High 基因改变在男性中明显富集。在年龄方面,包括ALK、RET、MET、EGFR、STK11、KEAP1、BRAF和KRAS在内的41个基因以及TMB-High的改变发生率在不同年龄段的患者中存在明显差异:通过对一个大型真实世界数据集进行综合分析,发现了 NSCLC 基因组改变中与祖先相关的差异。此外,还观察到基因组改变流行率和 TMB-High 状态与年龄和性别相关的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ancestry-, Sex-, and Age-Based Differences of Gene Alterations in NSCLC: From the Real-World Data of Cancer Genomic Profiling Tests.

Background: Some genomic alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are known to differ according to race, sex, or age. These studies have been limited in sample size and thus they cannot detect the differences precisely and comprehensively.

Methods: Tissue-based comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on 75,362 patients with NSCLC from the United States during routine clinical care. Additionally, we examined data of a Japanese NSCLC cohort with 1,019 patients. In the US cohort, 296 genes were examined for pathogenic alterations. Predominant genetic ancestry was inferred using a SNP-based approach, and patients were categorized into European (EUR), African (AFR), East Asian (EAS), Admixed American (AMR), and South Asian (SAS) ancestry groups. Patients were additionally stratified by histologic type, age (<40/≥40 years, <75/≥75 years), and sex. The prevalence of high tumor mutational burden (TMB-High) and microsatellite instability status was also calculated.

Results: Stratified by ancestry, EGFR alterations were significantly enriched in EAS versus other ancestry groups. The prevalence of ALK was significantly higher in the AMR, EAS, and SAS patients than in AFR and EUR patients. KRAS and STK11 were enriched in EUR and AFR patients versus other groups. TMB-High was significantly enriched in AFR patients versus all other groups. An analysis based on sex revealed differences in prevalence of alterations in 80 genes and TMB-High status. For example, EGFR, ALK, BRAF, and KRAS alterations were significantly enriched in females, whereas TP53, STK11, KEAP1, and TMB-High were significantly enriched in males. With respect to age, the prevalence of alterations in 41 genes, including ALK, RET, MET, EGFR, STK11, KEAP1, BRAF, and KRAS, as well as TMB-High, were significantly different between patients aged <40 years and those aged ≥40 years.

Conclusions: Comprehensive analysis from a large real-world dataset revealed ancestry-associated differences in genomic alterations in NSCLC. Age- and sex-related differences in prevalence of genomic alterations and TMB-High status were also observed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.
期刊最新文献
Proportion of Gleason Score ≥8 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy and Tumor Aggressiveness in Matched Cohorts of East Asian and Non-East Asian Men. Local Recurrence and Survival in Patients With Melanoma >2 mm in Thickness at Difficult Sites Treated With 1-cm Versus 2-cm Margins. Oncology Survivorship Care Clinics: Design and Implementation of Survivorship Care Delivery Systems at NCCN Member Institutions. Achieving Adherence With NCCN Guidelines for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Regarding Peripheral and Deep En Face Margin Assessment (PDEMA). Authors' Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Wu Re: Enhancing the Readability of Online Patient-Facing Content Using AI Chatbots.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1