全身炎症反应指数与急性缺血性脑卒中患者的短期功能预后:一项元分析

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1007/s40120-024-00645-2
Ying Han, Nan Lin
{"title":"全身炎症反应指数与急性缺血性脑卒中患者的短期功能预后:一项元分析","authors":"Ying Han, Nan Lin","doi":"10.1007/s40120-024-00645-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) is a novel indicator of systemic inflammation derived from the absolute counts of neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between SIRI and functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed in this meta-analysis. Relevant cohort studies were retrieved by a search of electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from database inception to February 9, 2024. A poor functional outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale ≥ 3 within 3 months after disease onset. A random-effects model was used to combine the data by incorporating the influence of between-study heterogeneity. The protocol of the meta-analysis was not prospectively registered in PROSPERO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen cohort studies were included. Pooled results showed that a high SIRI at admission was associated with increased risk of poor functional outcome within 3 months (odds ratio [OR]: 1.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.39 to 1.78, p < 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Results of the meta-regression analysis suggested that the cutoff for defining a high SIRI was positively related to the OR for the association between SIRI and the risk of poor functional outcome (coefficient = 0.13, p = 0.03), while other variables including sample size, mean age, severity of stroke at admission, percentage of men, current smokers, or patients with diabetes did not significantly modify the results. Subgroup analyses according to study design, main treatments, and study quality scores showed similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high SIRI may be associated with a poor functional outcome in patients after AIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19216,"journal":{"name":"Neurology and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11393365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic Inflammatory Response Index and the Short-Term Functional Outcome of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Han, Nan Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40120-024-00645-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) is a novel indicator of systemic inflammation derived from the absolute counts of neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between SIRI and functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed in this meta-analysis. Relevant cohort studies were retrieved by a search of electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from database inception to February 9, 2024. A poor functional outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale ≥ 3 within 3 months after disease onset. A random-effects model was used to combine the data by incorporating the influence of between-study heterogeneity. The protocol of the meta-analysis was not prospectively registered in PROSPERO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen cohort studies were included. Pooled results showed that a high SIRI at admission was associated with increased risk of poor functional outcome within 3 months (odds ratio [OR]: 1.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.39 to 1.78, p < 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Results of the meta-regression analysis suggested that the cutoff for defining a high SIRI was positively related to the OR for the association between SIRI and the risk of poor functional outcome (coefficient = 0.13, p = 0.03), while other variables including sample size, mean age, severity of stroke at admission, percentage of men, current smokers, or patients with diabetes did not significantly modify the results. Subgroup analyses according to study design, main treatments, and study quality scores showed similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high SIRI may be associated with a poor functional outcome in patients after AIS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology and Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11393365/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-024-00645-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-024-00645-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)是根据中性粒细胞、单核细胞和淋巴细胞的绝对计数得出的一种新型全身炎症指标。本荟萃分析旨在评估 SIRI 与急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者功能预后之间的关系:本荟萃分析遵循《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南。通过检索包括 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、万方和中国国家知识基础设施在内的电子数据库,检索了从数据库开始到 2024 年 2 月 9 日的相关队列研究。不良功能结局的定义是发病后3个月内改良Rankin量表≥3。通过纳入研究间异质性的影响,采用随机效应模型合并数据。荟萃分析方案未在PROSPERO中进行前瞻性注册:结果:共纳入 14 项队列研究。汇总结果显示,入院时 SIRI 高与 3 个月内功能预后差的风险增加有关(几率比 [OR]:1.57,95% 置信区间:1.39 至 1.78,P 2 = 0%)。元回归分析的结果表明,定义高 SIRI 的临界值与 SIRI 和不良功能预后风险之间的相关性 OR 呈正相关(系数 = 0.13,P = 0.03),而其他变量,包括样本量、平均年龄、入院时卒中严重程度、男性比例、当前吸烟者或糖尿病患者,均未对结果产生显著影响。根据研究设计、主要治疗方法和研究质量评分进行的亚组分析显示了相似的结果:结论:高SIRI可能与AIS患者功能预后不良有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systemic Inflammatory Response Index and the Short-Term Functional Outcome of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis.

Introduction: The systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) is a novel indicator of systemic inflammation derived from the absolute counts of neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between SIRI and functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed in this meta-analysis. Relevant cohort studies were retrieved by a search of electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from database inception to February 9, 2024. A poor functional outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale ≥ 3 within 3 months after disease onset. A random-effects model was used to combine the data by incorporating the influence of between-study heterogeneity. The protocol of the meta-analysis was not prospectively registered in PROSPERO.

Results: Fourteen cohort studies were included. Pooled results showed that a high SIRI at admission was associated with increased risk of poor functional outcome within 3 months (odds ratio [OR]: 1.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.39 to 1.78, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%). Results of the meta-regression analysis suggested that the cutoff for defining a high SIRI was positively related to the OR for the association between SIRI and the risk of poor functional outcome (coefficient = 0.13, p = 0.03), while other variables including sample size, mean age, severity of stroke at admission, percentage of men, current smokers, or patients with diabetes did not significantly modify the results. Subgroup analyses according to study design, main treatments, and study quality scores showed similar results.

Conclusion: A high SIRI may be associated with a poor functional outcome in patients after AIS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology and Therapy
Neurology and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope Neurology and Therapy aims to provide reliable and inclusive, rapid publication for all therapy related research for neurological indications, supporting the timely dissemination of research with a global reach, to help advance scientific discovery and support clinical practice. Neurology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of neurological and psychiatric therapies, (also covering surgery and devices). Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also welcomed. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial designs, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Neurology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research. Rapid Publication The journal’s rapid publication timelines aim for a peer review decision within 2 weeks of submission. If an article is accepted, it will be published online 3-4 weeks from acceptance. These rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who closely manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with rapid peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model, this allows for the rapid and efficient communication of the latest research and reviews to support scientific discovery and clinical practice. Open Access All articles published by Neurology and Therapy are open access. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning that authors will always have a personal point of contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. We also encourage pre-submission enquiries and are always happy to provide a confidential assessment of manuscripts. Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries Neurology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/ Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €5250/$6000/£4300. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case-by-case basis. Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviews conflict, an Editorial Board Member will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed. Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised, it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor, and authors are welcome to make rebuttals against individual reviewer comments, if appropriate. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors'' or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Please see here for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Copyright Neurology and Therapy is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0. Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact managing editor Lydia Alborn at lydia.alborn@springer.com.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Safety of Deutetrabenazine for the Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia and Chorea Associated with Huntington Disease. Patient and Physician Perspectives of Treatment Burden in Multiple Sclerosis. Symptoms of Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis: The Patient and Physician Perspective. Navigating the Landscape of Plasma Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease: Focus on Past, Present, and Future Clinical Applications. Advancements and Challenges in Exercise Training for Multiple Sclerosis: Comprehensive Review and Future Directions for Randomized Controlled Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1