通过各种方法对肺癌和甲状腺癌样本中的 RET 融合和 RET 突变进行首次能力测试的成功率很高。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Virchows Archiv Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1007/s00428-024-03890-w
Udo Siebolts, Roberto Pappesch, Marcus Bauer, Wolfgang Dietmaier, Mareike Ernst, Anja Haak, Nils Hartmann, Katharina Ilm, Stavros Kalbourtzis, Thomas Krause, Daniel Kazdal, Hubert Schorle, Kirsten Utpatel, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse
{"title":"通过各种方法对肺癌和甲状腺癌样本中的 RET 融合和 RET 突变进行首次能力测试的成功率很高。","authors":"Udo Siebolts, Roberto Pappesch, Marcus Bauer, Wolfgang Dietmaier, Mareike Ernst, Anja Haak, Nils Hartmann, Katharina Ilm, Stavros Kalbourtzis, Thomas Krause, Daniel Kazdal, Hubert Schorle, Kirsten Utpatel, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03890-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study describes the external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for molecular testing of RET alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), medullary thyroid carcinomas (MTC), and non-MTC. The lead panel institute and Quality Assurance Initiative in Pathology (Qualitätssicherungs-Initiative Pathologie [QuIP] GmbH) selected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue from MTC for RET mutation testing by next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods and FFPE tissue from NSCLC and non-MTC for RET gene fusion testing using either in situ hybridisation (ISH) or NGS methods, forming 3 sub-schemes of the EQA scheme. Tissue material underwent an internal validation phase followed by an external testing phase. The internal validation phase served as a cross-validation step conducted by panel institutes. In the external testing phase, the number of participating institutes in the RET point mutation sub-scheme, RET fusion (ISH) sub-scheme, and RET fusion (NGS) sub-scheme was 32, 24, and 38, respectively. The reported success rates for external testing were 96.0%, 89.5%, and 93.5% for the RET point mutation, the ISH RET fusion, and the NGS RET fusion EQA sub-schemes, respectively. These findings confirm the reliability of the NGS method in detecting RET alterations and align with current screening recommendations. Overall, 31 institutes were certified for RET point mutation testing by NGS methods, 22 institutes were certified for RET fusion testing by ISH, and 36 institutes were certified for RET fusion testing by NGS methods. Results can be employed to inform real-world diagnostic decisions in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High success rate of first proficiency testing for RET fusions and RET mutations in lung and thyroid cancer samples by various methods.\",\"authors\":\"Udo Siebolts, Roberto Pappesch, Marcus Bauer, Wolfgang Dietmaier, Mareike Ernst, Anja Haak, Nils Hartmann, Katharina Ilm, Stavros Kalbourtzis, Thomas Krause, Daniel Kazdal, Hubert Schorle, Kirsten Utpatel, Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00428-024-03890-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study describes the external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for molecular testing of RET alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), medullary thyroid carcinomas (MTC), and non-MTC. The lead panel institute and Quality Assurance Initiative in Pathology (Qualitätssicherungs-Initiative Pathologie [QuIP] GmbH) selected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue from MTC for RET mutation testing by next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods and FFPE tissue from NSCLC and non-MTC for RET gene fusion testing using either in situ hybridisation (ISH) or NGS methods, forming 3 sub-schemes of the EQA scheme. Tissue material underwent an internal validation phase followed by an external testing phase. The internal validation phase served as a cross-validation step conducted by panel institutes. In the external testing phase, the number of participating institutes in the RET point mutation sub-scheme, RET fusion (ISH) sub-scheme, and RET fusion (NGS) sub-scheme was 32, 24, and 38, respectively. The reported success rates for external testing were 96.0%, 89.5%, and 93.5% for the RET point mutation, the ISH RET fusion, and the NGS RET fusion EQA sub-schemes, respectively. These findings confirm the reliability of the NGS method in detecting RET alterations and align with current screening recommendations. Overall, 31 institutes were certified for RET point mutation testing by NGS methods, 22 institutes were certified for RET fusion testing by ISH, and 36 institutes were certified for RET fusion testing by NGS methods. Results can be employed to inform real-world diagnostic decisions in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03890-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03890-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究介绍了对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)、甲状腺髓样癌(MTC)和非MTC中RET改变进行分子检测的外部质量评估(EQA)计划。牵头专家小组研究所和病理学质量保证倡议组织(Qualitätssicherungs-Initiative Pathologie [QuIP] GmbH)从 MTC 中选择了福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织,采用新一代测序(NGS)方法进行 RET 基因突变检测;从 NSCLC 和非 MTC 中选择了 FFPE 组织,采用原位杂交(ISH)或 NGS 方法进行 RET 基因融合检测,形成了 EQA 计划的 3 个子计划。组织材料经过内部验证阶段和外部测试阶段。内部验证阶段由专家小组机构进行交叉验证。在外部测试阶段,参与 RET 点突变子计划、RET 融合(ISH)子计划和 RET 融合(NGS)子计划的机构数量分别为 32、24 和 38 家。据报告,RET点突变、ISH RET融合和NGS RET融合EQA子方案的外部检测成功率分别为96.0%、89.5%和93.5%。这些结果证实了 NGS 方法在检测 RET 改变方面的可靠性,并符合当前的筛查建议。总体而言,31 家机构通过了 NGS 方法检测 RET 点突变的认证,22 家机构通过了 ISH 方法检测 RET 融合的认证,36 家机构通过了 NGS 方法检测 RET 融合的认证。这些结果可为德国、奥地利和瑞士的实际诊断决策提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High success rate of first proficiency testing for RET fusions and RET mutations in lung and thyroid cancer samples by various methods.

This study describes the external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for molecular testing of RET alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), medullary thyroid carcinomas (MTC), and non-MTC. The lead panel institute and Quality Assurance Initiative in Pathology (Qualitätssicherungs-Initiative Pathologie [QuIP] GmbH) selected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue from MTC for RET mutation testing by next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods and FFPE tissue from NSCLC and non-MTC for RET gene fusion testing using either in situ hybridisation (ISH) or NGS methods, forming 3 sub-schemes of the EQA scheme. Tissue material underwent an internal validation phase followed by an external testing phase. The internal validation phase served as a cross-validation step conducted by panel institutes. In the external testing phase, the number of participating institutes in the RET point mutation sub-scheme, RET fusion (ISH) sub-scheme, and RET fusion (NGS) sub-scheme was 32, 24, and 38, respectively. The reported success rates for external testing were 96.0%, 89.5%, and 93.5% for the RET point mutation, the ISH RET fusion, and the NGS RET fusion EQA sub-schemes, respectively. These findings confirm the reliability of the NGS method in detecting RET alterations and align with current screening recommendations. Overall, 31 institutes were certified for RET point mutation testing by NGS methods, 22 institutes were certified for RET fusion testing by ISH, and 36 institutes were certified for RET fusion testing by NGS methods. Results can be employed to inform real-world diagnostic decisions in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Virchows Archiv
Virchows Archiv 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.
期刊最新文献
Histologic spectrum and outcome of Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a single center experience and a survey of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TGCA) cohort Acceptance of emerging renal oncocytic neoplasms: a survey of urologic pathologists Publication productivity of pathology residents: a nationwide cohort study in France TMPRSS2::ETS translocation in nonprostatic malignancies: an unexpected finding in thymic carcinoma and pulmonary adenocarcinoma Aberrant localization of β1 integrin in podocyte cytoplasm of primary FSGS with cellular lesion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1