心房颤动患者心肺运动测试的变异性以及高强度间歇训练和中高强度持续训练运动反应者的确定。

Tasuku Terada, Daniel A Keir, Juan M Murias, Sol Vidal-Almela, John Buckley, Jennifer L Reed
{"title":"心房颤动患者心肺运动测试的变异性以及高强度间歇训练和中高强度持续训练运动反应者的确定。","authors":"Tasuku Terada, Daniel A Keir, Juan M Murias, Sol Vidal-Almela, John Buckley, Jennifer L Reed","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2024-0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disabling atrial fibrillation (AF)-related symptoms and different testing settings may influence day-to-day cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) measurements, which can affect exercise prescription for high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-to-vigorous intensity continuous training (M-VICT) and their outcomes. This study examined the reliability of CPET in patients with AF and assessed the proportion of participants achieving minimal detectable changes (MDC) in peak oxygen consumption (V̇O<sub>2peak</sub>) following HIIT and M-VICT. Participants were randomized into HIIT or M-VICT after completing two baseline CPETs: one with cardiac stress technologists (CPET<sub>diag</sub>) and the other with a research team of exercise specialists (CPET<sub>research</sub>). Additional CPET was completed following 12 weeks of twice-weekly training. The reliability of CPET<sub>diag</sub> and CPET<sub>research</sub> was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and dependent <i>t</i> tests. The MDC score was calculated for V̇O<sub>2peak</sub> using a reliable change index. The proportion of participants achieving MDC was compared between HIIT and M-VICT using chi-square analysis. Eighteen participants (69 ± 7 years, 33% females) completed two baseline CPETs. The ICCs were significant for all measured variables. However, peak power output (PO<sub>peak</sub>: 124 ± 40 vs. 148 ± 40 watts, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and HR (HR<sub>peak</sub>: 136 ± 22 vs. 148 ± 30 bpm, <i>p</i> = 0.023) were significantly greater in CPET<sub>research</sub> than CPET<sub>diag</sub>. Few participants achieved MDC in V̇O<sub>2peak</sub> (5.6 mL/kg/min) with no difference between HIIT (0%) and M-VICT (10.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.244). PO<sub>peak</sub> and HR<sub>peak</sub> differed significantly in patients with AF when CPETs were repeated under different settings. Caution must be practised when prescribing exercise intensity based on these measures as under-prescription may increase the number of exercise non-responders.</p>","PeriodicalId":93878,"journal":{"name":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with atrial fibrillation and determination of exercise responders to high-intensity interval training and moderate-to-vigorous intensity continuous training.\",\"authors\":\"Tasuku Terada, Daniel A Keir, Juan M Murias, Sol Vidal-Almela, John Buckley, Jennifer L Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/apnm-2024-0060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Disabling atrial fibrillation (AF)-related symptoms and different testing settings may influence day-to-day cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) measurements, which can affect exercise prescription for high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-to-vigorous intensity continuous training (M-VICT) and their outcomes. This study examined the reliability of CPET in patients with AF and assessed the proportion of participants achieving minimal detectable changes (MDC) in peak oxygen consumption (V̇O<sub>2peak</sub>) following HIIT and M-VICT. Participants were randomized into HIIT or M-VICT after completing two baseline CPETs: one with cardiac stress technologists (CPET<sub>diag</sub>) and the other with a research team of exercise specialists (CPET<sub>research</sub>). Additional CPET was completed following 12 weeks of twice-weekly training. The reliability of CPET<sub>diag</sub> and CPET<sub>research</sub> was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and dependent <i>t</i> tests. The MDC score was calculated for V̇O<sub>2peak</sub> using a reliable change index. The proportion of participants achieving MDC was compared between HIIT and M-VICT using chi-square analysis. Eighteen participants (69 ± 7 years, 33% females) completed two baseline CPETs. The ICCs were significant for all measured variables. However, peak power output (PO<sub>peak</sub>: 124 ± 40 vs. 148 ± 40 watts, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and HR (HR<sub>peak</sub>: 136 ± 22 vs. 148 ± 30 bpm, <i>p</i> = 0.023) were significantly greater in CPET<sub>research</sub> than CPET<sub>diag</sub>. Few participants achieved MDC in V̇O<sub>2peak</sub> (5.6 mL/kg/min) with no difference between HIIT (0%) and M-VICT (10.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.244). PO<sub>peak</sub> and HR<sub>peak</sub> differed significantly in patients with AF when CPETs were repeated under different settings. Caution must be practised when prescribing exercise intensity based on these measures as under-prescription may increase the number of exercise non-responders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与心房颤动(房颤)相关的致残性症状和不同的测试设置可能会影响日常心肺运动测试(CPET)的测量结果,从而影响高强度间歇训练(HIIT)和中高强度持续训练(M-VICT)的运动处方及其结果。本研究考察了 CPET 在房颤患者中的可靠性,并评估了参与者在进行 HIIT 和 M-VICT 后达到峰值耗氧量(V鄄O2peak)最小可检测变化(MDC)的比例。参与者在完成两次基线 CPET(一次是由心脏负荷技术专家(CPETdiag)完成,另一次是由运动专家组成的研究小组(CPETresearch)完成)后,被随机分为 HIIT 或 M-VICT。在进行了为期 12 周、每周两次的训练后,又完成了 CPET。CPETdiag 和 CPETresearch 的可靠性通过类内相关系数 (ICC) 和依赖性 t 检验进行评估。使用可靠的变化指数计算 V̇O2peak 的 MDC 分数。采用卡方分析比较了 HIIT 和 M-VICT 达到 MDC 的参与者比例。18 名参与者(69±7 岁,33% 为女性)完成了两次基线 CPET。所有测量变量的 ICC 均有显著性。然而,峰值功率输出(POpeak:124±40 瓦 vs. 148±40 瓦,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Variability of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with atrial fibrillation and determination of exercise responders to high-intensity interval training and moderate-to-vigorous intensity continuous training.

Disabling atrial fibrillation (AF)-related symptoms and different testing settings may influence day-to-day cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) measurements, which can affect exercise prescription for high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-to-vigorous intensity continuous training (M-VICT) and their outcomes. This study examined the reliability of CPET in patients with AF and assessed the proportion of participants achieving minimal detectable changes (MDC) in peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2peak) following HIIT and M-VICT. Participants were randomized into HIIT or M-VICT after completing two baseline CPETs: one with cardiac stress technologists (CPETdiag) and the other with a research team of exercise specialists (CPETresearch). Additional CPET was completed following 12 weeks of twice-weekly training. The reliability of CPETdiag and CPETresearch was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and dependent t tests. The MDC score was calculated for V̇O2peak using a reliable change index. The proportion of participants achieving MDC was compared between HIIT and M-VICT using chi-square analysis. Eighteen participants (69 ± 7 years, 33% females) completed two baseline CPETs. The ICCs were significant for all measured variables. However, peak power output (POpeak: 124 ± 40 vs. 148 ± 40 watts, p < 0.001) and HR (HRpeak: 136 ± 22 vs. 148 ± 30 bpm, p = 0.023) were significantly greater in CPETresearch than CPETdiag. Few participants achieved MDC in V̇O2peak (5.6 mL/kg/min) with no difference between HIIT (0%) and M-VICT (10.0%, p = 0.244). POpeak and HRpeak differed significantly in patients with AF when CPETs were repeated under different settings. Caution must be practised when prescribing exercise intensity based on these measures as under-prescription may increase the number of exercise non-responders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Peak V̇O2 during handcycling in spinal cord injured athletes: incremental versus verification testing. Brown rice attenuates iron-induced Parkinson's disease phenotypes in male wild-type drosophila: insights into antioxidant and iron metabolism modulation. Canada-wide survey of school food programs. Associations between Sleep, Energy Balance and Obesity Markers over 6 Months in Black Emerging Adults - Pilot Study Findings from the Sleep, Health Outcomes and Body Weight (SHOW) Study. Associations between objectively measured nighttime sleep duration, sleep timing, and sleep quality and body composition in toddlers in the Guelph Family Health Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1