未来 1 型糖尿病青少年对自动胰岛素输送系统的接受程度:意大利人工胰腺接受度测量的验证。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Acta Diabetologica Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1007/s00592-024-02327-9
Roberto Franceschi, Riccardo Pertile, Marco Marigliano, Enza Mozzillo, Claudio Maffeis, Silvana Zaffani, Carlotta Dusini, Annalisa Antonelli, Francesca Di Candia, Giulio Maltoni, Erika Cantarelli, Nicola Minuto, Marta Bassi, Ivana Rabbone, Silvia Savastio, Stefano Passanisi, Fortunato Lombardo, Valentino Cherubini, Maria Alessandra Saltarelli, Stefano Tumini
{"title":"未来 1 型糖尿病青少年对自动胰岛素输送系统的接受程度:意大利人工胰腺接受度测量的验证。","authors":"Roberto Franceschi, Riccardo Pertile, Marco Marigliano, Enza Mozzillo, Claudio Maffeis, Silvana Zaffani, Carlotta Dusini, Annalisa Antonelli, Francesca Di Candia, Giulio Maltoni, Erika Cantarelli, Nicola Minuto, Marta Bassi, Ivana Rabbone, Silvia Savastio, Stefano Passanisi, Fortunato Lombardo, Valentino Cherubini, Maria Alessandra Saltarelli, Stefano Tumini","doi":"10.1007/s00592-024-02327-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire to examine the future acceptance of Automatic insulin delivery systems (AIDs), their perceived usefulness, ease of use, and trust in the device in subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire in Italian, based on the Technology Acceptance Model, was developed to examine intention to use AIDs, considered as a measure of future acceptance, and its determinants to use the system. A total of 43 questions for children and 46 for parents were included, and a 5-point Likert scale was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>239 subjects with T1D using multiple daily injections (MDI) or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) and their parents completed the questionnaire. The completion rate was excellent, with almost 100% of items answered. The overall Cronbach's coefficient for children and adolescents was 0.92 and 0.93 for parents, indicating excellent internal consistency in both groups. Parent-youth agreement was 0.699 (95% confidence interval: 0.689-0.709), indicating a good agreement between the two evaluations. Factor analysis identified measurement factors for the \"artificial pancreas (AP)-acceptance labeled benefits and hassles of AIDs, and the internal consistency of the total scale was alpha = 0.94 for subjects with T1D and 0.95 for parents. The level of AP acceptance was more than neutral: 3.91 ± 0.47 and 3.99 ± 0.43 (p = 0.07) for youths and parents, respectively (possible score range 1 to 5, neutral score is 3.0). Parents reported higher scores in the benefit items than children-adolescents (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a new questionnaire based on the items available in the literature, and we demonstrated that the \"AP-acceptance\" reveals a meaningful factor structure, good internal reliability, and agreement between parent-young people evaluations. This measure could be a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers to assess AP acceptance in pediatric patients with T1D and their parents. This patient profiling approach could help to enroll candidates for AIDs with proper expectations and who most likely will benefit from the system.</p>","PeriodicalId":6921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Diabetologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Future acceptance of automated insulin delivery systems in youths with type 1 diabetes: validation of the Italian artificial pancreas-acceptance measure.\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Franceschi, Riccardo Pertile, Marco Marigliano, Enza Mozzillo, Claudio Maffeis, Silvana Zaffani, Carlotta Dusini, Annalisa Antonelli, Francesca Di Candia, Giulio Maltoni, Erika Cantarelli, Nicola Minuto, Marta Bassi, Ivana Rabbone, Silvia Savastio, Stefano Passanisi, Fortunato Lombardo, Valentino Cherubini, Maria Alessandra Saltarelli, Stefano Tumini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00592-024-02327-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire to examine the future acceptance of Automatic insulin delivery systems (AIDs), their perceived usefulness, ease of use, and trust in the device in subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire in Italian, based on the Technology Acceptance Model, was developed to examine intention to use AIDs, considered as a measure of future acceptance, and its determinants to use the system. A total of 43 questions for children and 46 for parents were included, and a 5-point Likert scale was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>239 subjects with T1D using multiple daily injections (MDI) or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) and their parents completed the questionnaire. The completion rate was excellent, with almost 100% of items answered. The overall Cronbach's coefficient for children and adolescents was 0.92 and 0.93 for parents, indicating excellent internal consistency in both groups. Parent-youth agreement was 0.699 (95% confidence interval: 0.689-0.709), indicating a good agreement between the two evaluations. Factor analysis identified measurement factors for the \\\"artificial pancreas (AP)-acceptance labeled benefits and hassles of AIDs, and the internal consistency of the total scale was alpha = 0.94 for subjects with T1D and 0.95 for parents. The level of AP acceptance was more than neutral: 3.91 ± 0.47 and 3.99 ± 0.43 (p = 0.07) for youths and parents, respectively (possible score range 1 to 5, neutral score is 3.0). Parents reported higher scores in the benefit items than children-adolescents (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed a new questionnaire based on the items available in the literature, and we demonstrated that the \\\"AP-acceptance\\\" reveals a meaningful factor structure, good internal reliability, and agreement between parent-young people evaluations. This measure could be a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers to assess AP acceptance in pediatric patients with T1D and their parents. This patient profiling approach could help to enroll candidates for AIDs with proper expectations and who most likely will benefit from the system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Diabetologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Diabetologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-024-02327-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Diabetologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-024-02327-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是编制一份调查问卷,以调查 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者对胰岛素自动给药系统(AIDs)的未来接受程度、对其有用性、易用性的感知以及对该设备的信任度:方法:根据技术接受模型编制了一份意大利语调查问卷,以调查使用胰岛素给药系统的意向(作为未来接受程度的衡量标准)及其使用该系统的决定因素。结果:239 名使用每日多次注射(MDI)或传感器增强泵(SAP)的 T1D 患者及其父母完成了问卷调查。问卷完成率非常高,几乎100%的项目都得到了回答。儿童和青少年的总体克朗巴赫系数(Cronbach's coefficient)为 0.92,家长为 0.93,表明这两个群体的内部一致性都非常好。家长与青少年的一致性为 0.699(95% 置信区间:0.689-0.709),表明两个评价之间的一致性很好。因子分析确定了 "人工胰腺(AP)接受度 "的测量因子,标注了人工胰腺的益处和麻烦,T1D 受试者总量表的内部一致性为 alpha = 0.94,家长总量表的内部一致性为 0.95。青少年和家长对 AP 的接受程度高于中性水平:分别为 3.91 ± 0.47 和 3.99 ± 0.43(p = 0.07)(可能得分范围为 1 至 5,中性分数为 3.0)。家长在受益项目中的得分高于儿童青少年(p = 0.04):我们根据文献中的项目编制了一份新的问卷,并证明了 "AP-接受度 "具有有意义的因子结构、良好的内部信度以及父母与青少年评价之间的一致性。这一测量方法可以成为临床医生和研究人员评估 T1D 儿科患者及其父母对 AP 接受程度的宝贵资源。这种对患者进行特征分析的方法有助于招收具有适当期望并最有可能从该系统中受益的 AID 候选者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Future acceptance of automated insulin delivery systems in youths with type 1 diabetes: validation of the Italian artificial pancreas-acceptance measure.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire to examine the future acceptance of Automatic insulin delivery systems (AIDs), their perceived usefulness, ease of use, and trust in the device in subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Methods: A questionnaire in Italian, based on the Technology Acceptance Model, was developed to examine intention to use AIDs, considered as a measure of future acceptance, and its determinants to use the system. A total of 43 questions for children and 46 for parents were included, and a 5-point Likert scale was used.

Results: 239 subjects with T1D using multiple daily injections (MDI) or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) and their parents completed the questionnaire. The completion rate was excellent, with almost 100% of items answered. The overall Cronbach's coefficient for children and adolescents was 0.92 and 0.93 for parents, indicating excellent internal consistency in both groups. Parent-youth agreement was 0.699 (95% confidence interval: 0.689-0.709), indicating a good agreement between the two evaluations. Factor analysis identified measurement factors for the "artificial pancreas (AP)-acceptance labeled benefits and hassles of AIDs, and the internal consistency of the total scale was alpha = 0.94 for subjects with T1D and 0.95 for parents. The level of AP acceptance was more than neutral: 3.91 ± 0.47 and 3.99 ± 0.43 (p = 0.07) for youths and parents, respectively (possible score range 1 to 5, neutral score is 3.0). Parents reported higher scores in the benefit items than children-adolescents (p = 0.04).

Conclusions: We developed a new questionnaire based on the items available in the literature, and we demonstrated that the "AP-acceptance" reveals a meaningful factor structure, good internal reliability, and agreement between parent-young people evaluations. This measure could be a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers to assess AP acceptance in pediatric patients with T1D and their parents. This patient profiling approach could help to enroll candidates for AIDs with proper expectations and who most likely will benefit from the system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Diabetologica
Acta Diabetologica 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Acta Diabetologica is a journal that publishes reports of experimental and clinical research on diabetes mellitus and related metabolic diseases. Original contributions on biochemical, physiological, pathophysiological and clinical aspects of research on diabetes and metabolic diseases are welcome. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications and letters to the editor. Invited reviews and editorials are also published. A Methodology forum, which publishes contributions on methodological aspects of diabetes in vivo and in vitro, is also available. The Editor-in-chief will be pleased to consider articles describing new techniques (e.g., new transplantation methods, metabolic models), of innovative importance in the field of diabetes/metabolism. Finally, workshop reports are also welcome in Acta Diabetologica.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the night-time effectiveness in achieving glycemic targets in adults with type 1 diabetes of three advanced hybryd closed-loop systems. Microbiome analysis of serum extracellular vesicles in gestational diabetes patients. Microvascular disease and severe COVID-19 outcomes in UKBiobank participants with diabetes. Association of remnant cholesterol with progression and regression of prediabetes in middle-aged and older adults: a nationwide cohort study. Diabetes as a risk factor for invasive meningococcal disease. A meta-analysis of observational studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1