Dong Li , Ruili Wei , Yongqing Ding , Ruili Hu , Shenghua Chen , Chuan Liu , Yunchao Xin , Qingjun Zhang , Yachao Liu
{"title":"内窥镜软骨衬垫咽鼓管成形术联合或不联合球囊咽鼓管成形术治疗慢性咽鼓管穿孔伴咽鼓管功能障碍。","authors":"Dong Li , Ruili Wei , Yongqing Ding , Ruili Hu , Shenghua Chen , Chuan Liu , Yunchao Xin , Qingjun Zhang , Yachao Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of endoscopic cartilage underlay myringoplasty(CNM) with or without balloon Eustachian tuboplasty (BET) for the treatment of chronic perforation with Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A total of 50 ears diagnosed with chronic perforation and ETD were randomly divided into receiving alone CNM and CNM + BET. During the 12 months follow-up, the Eustachian tube score (ETS), Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7), ET inflammation scale, hearing results and graft success rate of the patients were recorded and analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The improvement in the ETDQ-7 score was 6.23 ± 2.51 in the CNM + BET group, which was significantly higher than that in the CNM group (4.22 ± 3.85, <em>P</em> < 0.01) at postoperative 3 months, however, no significant between-group difference was found at post-12 months.The graft success rate was 88.0 % in the CNM group and 92.0 % in the CNM + BET group at postoperative 3 months (<em>P</em> > 0.05). Also, no significant difference was found among two groups (84.0 % vs 88.0 %, <em>P</em> > 0.05).The ABG improvement was 13.16 ± 3.19 dB in the CNM + BET group and 9.74 ± 2.56 dB in the CNM group, with a statistically significant between-group difference (<em>P</em> < 0.01)at postoperative 3 months. However, no significant between-group difference was found at postoperative 12 months. During followup process, neither complications nor patulous symptoms were noted. No patients developted atelectasis or otitis media with effusion. However, myringitis was seen in 8 % patients in the CNM group and 12 % patients in the CNM + BET group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although BET combined with endoscopic cartilage myringoplasty had better short-term improvement of hearing and ETDQ-7 scores compared with endoscopic cartilage myringoplasty for the treatment of chronic large perforation with ETD, the long-term outcomes was not satisfactory. Also, BET did not improve the 3-and 12 months graft success rate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"45 6","pages":"Article 104475"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic cartilage underlay myringoplasty with or without balloon Eustachian tuboplasty for chronic perforation with Eustachian tube dysfunction\",\"authors\":\"Dong Li , Ruili Wei , Yongqing Ding , Ruili Hu , Shenghua Chen , Chuan Liu , Yunchao Xin , Qingjun Zhang , Yachao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of endoscopic cartilage underlay myringoplasty(CNM) with or without balloon Eustachian tuboplasty (BET) for the treatment of chronic perforation with Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A total of 50 ears diagnosed with chronic perforation and ETD were randomly divided into receiving alone CNM and CNM + BET. During the 12 months follow-up, the Eustachian tube score (ETS), Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7), ET inflammation scale, hearing results and graft success rate of the patients were recorded and analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The improvement in the ETDQ-7 score was 6.23 ± 2.51 in the CNM + BET group, which was significantly higher than that in the CNM group (4.22 ± 3.85, <em>P</em> < 0.01) at postoperative 3 months, however, no significant between-group difference was found at post-12 months.The graft success rate was 88.0 % in the CNM group and 92.0 % in the CNM + BET group at postoperative 3 months (<em>P</em> > 0.05). Also, no significant difference was found among two groups (84.0 % vs 88.0 %, <em>P</em> > 0.05).The ABG improvement was 13.16 ± 3.19 dB in the CNM + BET group and 9.74 ± 2.56 dB in the CNM group, with a statistically significant between-group difference (<em>P</em> < 0.01)at postoperative 3 months. However, no significant between-group difference was found at postoperative 12 months. During followup process, neither complications nor patulous symptoms were noted. No patients developted atelectasis or otitis media with effusion. However, myringitis was seen in 8 % patients in the CNM group and 12 % patients in the CNM + BET group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although BET combined with endoscopic cartilage myringoplasty had better short-term improvement of hearing and ETDQ-7 scores compared with endoscopic cartilage myringoplasty for the treatment of chronic large perforation with ETD, the long-term outcomes was not satisfactory. Also, BET did not improve the 3-and 12 months graft success rate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 104475\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924002618\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070924002618","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究旨在比较内窥镜软骨衬垫耳环成形术（CNM）与气囊咽鼓管成形术（BET）治疗慢性穿孔伴咽鼓管功能障碍（ETD）的效果：共50只被诊断为慢性穿孔和咽鼓管功能障碍的耳朵被随机分为单独接受CNM和CNM + BET两种。在12个月的随访期间，记录并分析了患者的咽鼓管评分（ETS）、咽鼓管功能障碍问卷-7（ETDQ-7）、ET炎症量表、听力结果和移植成功率：CNM+BET组的ETDQ-7评分为（6.23 ± 2.51），明显高于CNM组（4.22 ± 3.85，P 0.05）。CNM + BET 组的 ABG 改善率为 13.16 ± 3.19 dB，CNM 组的 ABG 改善率为 9.74 ± 2.56 dB，组间差异有统计学意义（P 结论：虽然 BET 联合内镜下椎体骨瓣成形术对椎体骨质疏松症的治疗效果较好，但 BET 联合内镜下椎体骨瓣成形术对椎体骨质疏松症的治疗效果较差：虽然 BET 联合内窥镜软骨髓环成形术与内窥镜软骨髓环成形术相比，能更好地改善听力和 ETDQ-7 评分，但长期疗效并不令人满意。此外，BET 并未提高 3 个月和 12 个月的移植成功率。
Endoscopic cartilage underlay myringoplasty with or without balloon Eustachian tuboplasty for chronic perforation with Eustachian tube dysfunction
Objective
The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of endoscopic cartilage underlay myringoplasty(CNM) with or without balloon Eustachian tuboplasty (BET) for the treatment of chronic perforation with Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD).
Materials and methods
A total of 50 ears diagnosed with chronic perforation and ETD were randomly divided into receiving alone CNM and CNM + BET. During the 12 months follow-up, the Eustachian tube score (ETS), Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7), ET inflammation scale, hearing results and graft success rate of the patients were recorded and analyzed.
Results
The improvement in the ETDQ-7 score was 6.23 ± 2.51 in the CNM + BET group, which was significantly higher than that in the CNM group (4.22 ± 3.85, P < 0.01) at postoperative 3 months, however, no significant between-group difference was found at post-12 months.The graft success rate was 88.0 % in the CNM group and 92.0 % in the CNM + BET group at postoperative 3 months (P > 0.05). Also, no significant difference was found among two groups (84.0 % vs 88.0 %, P > 0.05).The ABG improvement was 13.16 ± 3.19 dB in the CNM + BET group and 9.74 ± 2.56 dB in the CNM group, with a statistically significant between-group difference (P < 0.01)at postoperative 3 months. However, no significant between-group difference was found at postoperative 12 months. During followup process, neither complications nor patulous symptoms were noted. No patients developted atelectasis or otitis media with effusion. However, myringitis was seen in 8 % patients in the CNM group and 12 % patients in the CNM + BET group.
Conclusions
Although BET combined with endoscopic cartilage myringoplasty had better short-term improvement of hearing and ETDQ-7 scores compared with endoscopic cartilage myringoplasty for the treatment of chronic large perforation with ETD, the long-term outcomes was not satisfactory. Also, BET did not improve the 3-and 12 months graft success rate.
期刊介绍：
Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
