衡量提供全面人工流产护理的可用性和设施准备情况:将人工流产纳入世卫组织卫生设施评估的经验和教训。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMJ Global Health Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015097
Heidi Bart Johnston, Katy Footman, Mohamed Mahmoud Ali, Eman Abdelkreem Aly, Chilanga Asmani, Sofonias Getachew Asrat, Dominic Kwabena Atweam, Sayema Awais, Richard Mangwi Ayiasi, Martin Owusu Boamah, Ovost Chooye, Roseline Doe, Benson Droti, Hayfa Elamin, Chris Fofie, Karima Gholbzouri, Azmach Hadush, Nilmini Hemachandra, Yelmali Hien, Francis Chisaka Kasolo, Hillary Kipruto, Yolanda Barbera Lainez, Nasan Natseri, Pamela Amaka Onyiah, Christopher Garimoi Orach, Assane Ouangare, Leopold Ouedraogo, Olive Sentumbwe-Mugisa, Ashley Sheffel, Amani Siyam, Martin Ssendyona, Ellen Thom, Rose Koirine Tingueri, Soumaïla Traoré, Qudsia Uzma, Wendy Venter, Bela Ganatra
{"title":"衡量提供全面人工流产护理的可用性和设施准备情况:将人工流产纳入世卫组织卫生设施评估的经验和教训。","authors":"Heidi Bart Johnston, Katy Footman, Mohamed Mahmoud Ali, Eman Abdelkreem Aly, Chilanga Asmani, Sofonias Getachew Asrat, Dominic Kwabena Atweam, Sayema Awais, Richard Mangwi Ayiasi, Martin Owusu Boamah, Ovost Chooye, Roseline Doe, Benson Droti, Hayfa Elamin, Chris Fofie, Karima Gholbzouri, Azmach Hadush, Nilmini Hemachandra, Yelmali Hien, Francis Chisaka Kasolo, Hillary Kipruto, Yolanda Barbera Lainez, Nasan Natseri, Pamela Amaka Onyiah, Christopher Garimoi Orach, Assane Ouangare, Leopold Ouedraogo, Olive Sentumbwe-Mugisa, Ashley Sheffel, Amani Siyam, Martin Ssendyona, Ellen Thom, Rose Koirine Tingueri, Soumaïla Traoré, Qudsia Uzma, Wendy Venter, Bela Ganatra","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Routine assessment of health facility capacity to provide abortion and post-abortion care can inform policy and programmes to expand access and improve quality. Since 2018, abortion and/or post-abortion care have been integrated into two WHO health facility assessment tools: the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment and the Harmonised Health Facility Assessment. We discuss lessons learnt through experiences integrating abortion into these standardised tools. Our experiences highlight the feasibility of including abortion in health facility assessments across a range of legal contexts. Factors facilitating the integration of abortion include cross-country collaboration and experience sharing, timely inputs into tool adaptations, clear leadership, close relationships among key stakeholders as in assessment coordination groups, use of locally appropriate terminology to refer to abortion and reference to national policies and guidelines. To facilitate high-quality data collection, we identify considerations around question sequencing in tool design, appropriate terminology and the need to balance the normalisation of abortion with adequate sensitisation and education of data collectors. To facilitate appropriate and consistent analysis, future work must ensure adequate disaggregation of recommended and non-recommended abortion methods, alignment with national guidelines and development of a standardised approach for measuring abortion service readiness. Measurement of abortion service availability and readiness should be a routine practice and a standardised component of health facility assessment tools. Evidence generated by health facility assessments that include abortion monitoring can guide efforts to expand access to timely and effective care and help normalise abortion as a core component of sexual and reproductive healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring availability of and facility readiness to deliver comprehensive abortion care: experiences and lessons learnt from integrating abortion into WHO's health facility assessments.\",\"authors\":\"Heidi Bart Johnston, Katy Footman, Mohamed Mahmoud Ali, Eman Abdelkreem Aly, Chilanga Asmani, Sofonias Getachew Asrat, Dominic Kwabena Atweam, Sayema Awais, Richard Mangwi Ayiasi, Martin Owusu Boamah, Ovost Chooye, Roseline Doe, Benson Droti, Hayfa Elamin, Chris Fofie, Karima Gholbzouri, Azmach Hadush, Nilmini Hemachandra, Yelmali Hien, Francis Chisaka Kasolo, Hillary Kipruto, Yolanda Barbera Lainez, Nasan Natseri, Pamela Amaka Onyiah, Christopher Garimoi Orach, Assane Ouangare, Leopold Ouedraogo, Olive Sentumbwe-Mugisa, Ashley Sheffel, Amani Siyam, Martin Ssendyona, Ellen Thom, Rose Koirine Tingueri, Soumaïla Traoré, Qudsia Uzma, Wendy Venter, Bela Ganatra\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Routine assessment of health facility capacity to provide abortion and post-abortion care can inform policy and programmes to expand access and improve quality. Since 2018, abortion and/or post-abortion care have been integrated into two WHO health facility assessment tools: the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment and the Harmonised Health Facility Assessment. We discuss lessons learnt through experiences integrating abortion into these standardised tools. Our experiences highlight the feasibility of including abortion in health facility assessments across a range of legal contexts. Factors facilitating the integration of abortion include cross-country collaboration and experience sharing, timely inputs into tool adaptations, clear leadership, close relationships among key stakeholders as in assessment coordination groups, use of locally appropriate terminology to refer to abortion and reference to national policies and guidelines. To facilitate high-quality data collection, we identify considerations around question sequencing in tool design, appropriate terminology and the need to balance the normalisation of abortion with adequate sensitisation and education of data collectors. To facilitate appropriate and consistent analysis, future work must ensure adequate disaggregation of recommended and non-recommended abortion methods, alignment with national guidelines and development of a standardised approach for measuring abortion service readiness. Measurement of abortion service availability and readiness should be a routine practice and a standardised component of health facility assessment tools. Evidence generated by health facility assessments that include abortion monitoring can guide efforts to expand access to timely and effective care and help normalise abortion as a core component of sexual and reproductive healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11344866/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015097\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015097","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对卫生设施提供人工流产和人工流产后护理的能力进行常规评估,可为政策和计划提供信息,以扩大获取机会并提高质量。自 2018 年以来,人工流产和/或流产后护理已被纳入两个世卫组织卫生设施评估工具:"服务可用性和准备情况评估 "和 "统一卫生设施评估"。我们讨论了将人工流产纳入这些标准化工具的经验教训。我们的经验强调了在各种法律背景下将人工流产纳入医疗机构评估的可行性。促进将人工流产纳入评估的因素包括:跨国合作和经验分享、对工具调整的及时投入、明确的领导、评估协调小组中主要利益相关者之间的密切关系、使用适合当地情况的术语提及人工流产以及参考国家政策和指南。为促进高质量的数据收集,我们确定了在工具设计中围绕问题排序的考虑因素、适当的术语以及平衡堕胎正常化与对数据收集者进行充分宣传和教育的必要性。为便于进行适当且一致的分析,未来的工作必须确保对推荐和非推荐人工流产方法进行适当分类,与国家指南保持一致,并制定衡量人工流产服务准备情况的标准化方法。衡量人工流产服务的可用性和准备程度应成为一种常规做法,并成为医疗卫生机构评估工具的标准化组成部分。包括人工流产监测在内的卫生设施评估所产生的证据可指导扩大及时有效的护理途径的工作,并有助于将人工流产规范化,使其成为性与生殖保健的核心组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring availability of and facility readiness to deliver comprehensive abortion care: experiences and lessons learnt from integrating abortion into WHO's health facility assessments.

Routine assessment of health facility capacity to provide abortion and post-abortion care can inform policy and programmes to expand access and improve quality. Since 2018, abortion and/or post-abortion care have been integrated into two WHO health facility assessment tools: the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment and the Harmonised Health Facility Assessment. We discuss lessons learnt through experiences integrating abortion into these standardised tools. Our experiences highlight the feasibility of including abortion in health facility assessments across a range of legal contexts. Factors facilitating the integration of abortion include cross-country collaboration and experience sharing, timely inputs into tool adaptations, clear leadership, close relationships among key stakeholders as in assessment coordination groups, use of locally appropriate terminology to refer to abortion and reference to national policies and guidelines. To facilitate high-quality data collection, we identify considerations around question sequencing in tool design, appropriate terminology and the need to balance the normalisation of abortion with adequate sensitisation and education of data collectors. To facilitate appropriate and consistent analysis, future work must ensure adequate disaggregation of recommended and non-recommended abortion methods, alignment with national guidelines and development of a standardised approach for measuring abortion service readiness. Measurement of abortion service availability and readiness should be a routine practice and a standardised component of health facility assessment tools. Evidence generated by health facility assessments that include abortion monitoring can guide efforts to expand access to timely and effective care and help normalise abortion as a core component of sexual and reproductive healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
The impact of a multi-faceted intervention on non-prescription dispensing of antibiotics by urban community pharmacies in Indonesia: a mixed methods evaluation. Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH): the evolution of a global health and development sector. Cost-effectiveness of surgical interventions in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and critical analysis of recent evidence. Learning from the Montreal Protocol to improve the global governance of antimicrobial resistance. Leveraging investments, promoting transparency and mobilising communities: a qualitative analysis of news articles about how the Ebola outbreak informed COVID-19 response in five African countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1