脊髓切断术控制癌症患者疼痛并减少阿片类药物用量:癌症中心 11 年的经验。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Ejso Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108571
{"title":"脊髓切断术控制癌症患者疼痛并减少阿片类药物用量:癌症中心 11 年的经验。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Percutaneous lateral cervical cordotomy (PLCC) is a treatment option for predominantly nociceptive pain of oncological origin that is refractory to conservative methods, with unilateral distribution, particularly in the lower trunk or lower limbs of patients with a life expectancy of less than one year.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to assess the analgesic efficacy and opioid utilization alteration in patients undergoing PLCC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively collected data from patients undergoing PLCC between 2011 and 2021 at the AC Camargo Cancer Center in São Paulo, Brazil.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-three patients and their respective surgical outcomes were analyzed. The mean preoperative pain intensity, as assessed by the mean numerical rating scale (NRS), was 8.4 (range: 4–10), while postoperatively, it decreased to 0.78 (range: 0–8). Lower postoperative NRS scores were observed for pain in the lower limbs and abdomen compared to the lower thorax. The mean preoperative oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption was 231.0 mg (range: 30.0–1015.2). At 30 days postoperative, the mean consumption of OME was 120.2 mg (range: 0.0–705.0). Twelve months after surgery, the average consumption of OME was 98.3 mg (range: 0.0–396.0).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PLCC is a valuable therapeutic intervention for patients experiencing cancer pain that is unresponsive to conservative treatments. The anticipated analgesic outcomes are generally favorable, particularly in cases where the pain is localized unilaterally in the abdomen or lower body segments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cordotomy for pain control and opioid reduction in cancer patients: A cancer center 11-year experience\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Percutaneous lateral cervical cordotomy (PLCC) is a treatment option for predominantly nociceptive pain of oncological origin that is refractory to conservative methods, with unilateral distribution, particularly in the lower trunk or lower limbs of patients with a life expectancy of less than one year.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to assess the analgesic efficacy and opioid utilization alteration in patients undergoing PLCC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively collected data from patients undergoing PLCC between 2011 and 2021 at the AC Camargo Cancer Center in São Paulo, Brazil.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-three patients and their respective surgical outcomes were analyzed. The mean preoperative pain intensity, as assessed by the mean numerical rating scale (NRS), was 8.4 (range: 4–10), while postoperatively, it decreased to 0.78 (range: 0–8). Lower postoperative NRS scores were observed for pain in the lower limbs and abdomen compared to the lower thorax. The mean preoperative oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption was 231.0 mg (range: 30.0–1015.2). At 30 days postoperative, the mean consumption of OME was 120.2 mg (range: 0.0–705.0). Twelve months after surgery, the average consumption of OME was 98.3 mg (range: 0.0–396.0).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>PLCC is a valuable therapeutic intervention for patients experiencing cancer pain that is unresponsive to conservative treatments. The anticipated analgesic outcomes are generally favorable, particularly in cases where the pain is localized unilaterally in the abdomen or lower body segments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ejso\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ejso\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798324006231\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798324006231","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经皮外侧颈脊髓切开术(PLCC)是一种治疗方法,适用于保守治疗无效、单侧分布的肿瘤性疼痛,尤其是预期寿命少于一年的患者的下躯干或下肢疼痛:本研究旨在评估接受PLCC治疗的患者的镇痛效果和阿片类药物使用的变化:我们回顾性地收集了2011年至2021年间在巴西圣保罗AC Camargo癌症中心接受PLCC治疗的患者的数据:对63名患者及其各自的手术结果进行了分析。术前疼痛强度的平均值为8.4(范围:4-10),术后则降至0.78(范围:0-8)。与下胸部相比,下肢和腹部的术后疼痛 NRS 评分较低。术前平均口服吗啡当量(OME)为 231.0 毫克(范围:30.0-1015.2)。术后 30 天,平均消耗口服吗啡当量为 120.2 毫克(范围:0.0-705.0)。术后 12 个月,OME 的平均消耗量为 98.3 毫克(范围:0.0-396.0):结论:对于保守治疗无效的癌痛患者来说,PLCC 是一种重要的治疗干预手段。预期的镇痛效果普遍良好,尤其是对于单侧腹部或下半身局部疼痛的病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cordotomy for pain control and opioid reduction in cancer patients: A cancer center 11-year experience

Background

Percutaneous lateral cervical cordotomy (PLCC) is a treatment option for predominantly nociceptive pain of oncological origin that is refractory to conservative methods, with unilateral distribution, particularly in the lower trunk or lower limbs of patients with a life expectancy of less than one year.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the analgesic efficacy and opioid utilization alteration in patients undergoing PLCC.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data from patients undergoing PLCC between 2011 and 2021 at the AC Camargo Cancer Center in São Paulo, Brazil.

Results

Sixty-three patients and their respective surgical outcomes were analyzed. The mean preoperative pain intensity, as assessed by the mean numerical rating scale (NRS), was 8.4 (range: 4–10), while postoperatively, it decreased to 0.78 (range: 0–8). Lower postoperative NRS scores were observed for pain in the lower limbs and abdomen compared to the lower thorax. The mean preoperative oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption was 231.0 mg (range: 30.0–1015.2). At 30 days postoperative, the mean consumption of OME was 120.2 mg (range: 0.0–705.0). Twelve months after surgery, the average consumption of OME was 98.3 mg (range: 0.0–396.0).

Conclusion

PLCC is a valuable therapeutic intervention for patients experiencing cancer pain that is unresponsive to conservative treatments. The anticipated analgesic outcomes are generally favorable, particularly in cases where the pain is localized unilaterally in the abdomen or lower body segments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Calendar of events IFC: Filler advert_sciencedirect_210x280.pdf Filler advert_pharmapendium_2021_210x280.pdf Filler advert_scopus_2021_210x280.pdf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1