{"title":"植入除颤器后的驾驶限制:关于对就业、日常生活和驾驶行为的影响的全国登记相关调查研究。","authors":"Malene Hammer Hansen, Trine Bernholdt Rasmussen, Signe Stelling Risom, Simone Rosenkranz, Morten Schou, Charlotte Larroudé, Gunnar Gislason, Anne-Christine Ruwald, Jenny Bjerre","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Following implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), patients are temporarily restricted from private motor vehicle driving and permanently prohibited from professional driving. We aimed to investigate the impact of driving restrictions following ICD implantation and in case of ICD shock on employment, daily living activities, driving concerns and driving behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Data were retrieved from a nationwide survey on driving restrictions in Danish ICD patients, distributed in 2017 to all patients ≥18 years implanted with a first-time ICD from 2013-2016 (n=3913). Responses were linked with data from nationwide registers. The response rate was 71% (final analyzable population n=2741, 83% male, median age 67 years, 316 had experienced an ICD shock, and 911 patients reported receipt of driving restrictions of minimum 1 month). Among active professional drivers (n=175), 33% had lost their job as a direct consequence of the driving restrictions. Of those working prior to ICD implantation (n=465), 47% reported being limited in maintaining employment due to private driving restrictions. Among those restricted from driving minimum 1 month, 26% reported the restrictions overall had substantially impeded their daily living. Factors associated with substantial impediment were age <65 years (OR 1.84 [95% CI 1.35-2.52]), higher income (OR 1.47 [95% CI 1.05-2.05]) and driving ≥7 hours/week pre-implantation (OR 1.66 [95% CI 1.23-2.24]). Being nervous about driving or altering driving habits was reported by 3-7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both professional and private driving restrictions affect the ability to maintain employment and have a negative impact on ICD recipients' daily living activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Driving Restrictions Following Defibrillator Implantation: A Nationwide Register-linked Survey Study on the Impact on Employment, Daily Living, and Driving Behaviour.\",\"authors\":\"Malene Hammer Hansen, Trine Bernholdt Rasmussen, Signe Stelling Risom, Simone Rosenkranz, Morten Schou, Charlotte Larroudé, Gunnar Gislason, Anne-Christine Ruwald, Jenny Bjerre\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Following implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), patients are temporarily restricted from private motor vehicle driving and permanently prohibited from professional driving. We aimed to investigate the impact of driving restrictions following ICD implantation and in case of ICD shock on employment, daily living activities, driving concerns and driving behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Data were retrieved from a nationwide survey on driving restrictions in Danish ICD patients, distributed in 2017 to all patients ≥18 years implanted with a first-time ICD from 2013-2016 (n=3913). Responses were linked with data from nationwide registers. The response rate was 71% (final analyzable population n=2741, 83% male, median age 67 years, 316 had experienced an ICD shock, and 911 patients reported receipt of driving restrictions of minimum 1 month). Among active professional drivers (n=175), 33% had lost their job as a direct consequence of the driving restrictions. Of those working prior to ICD implantation (n=465), 47% reported being limited in maintaining employment due to private driving restrictions. Among those restricted from driving minimum 1 month, 26% reported the restrictions overall had substantially impeded their daily living. Factors associated with substantial impediment were age <65 years (OR 1.84 [95% CI 1.35-2.52]), higher income (OR 1.47 [95% CI 1.05-2.05]) and driving ≥7 hours/week pre-implantation (OR 1.66 [95% CI 1.23-2.24]). Being nervous about driving or altering driving habits was reported by 3-7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both professional and private driving restrictions affect the ability to maintain employment and have a negative impact on ICD recipients' daily living activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae071\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Driving Restrictions Following Defibrillator Implantation: A Nationwide Register-linked Survey Study on the Impact on Employment, Daily Living, and Driving Behaviour.
Aims: Following implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), patients are temporarily restricted from private motor vehicle driving and permanently prohibited from professional driving. We aimed to investigate the impact of driving restrictions following ICD implantation and in case of ICD shock on employment, daily living activities, driving concerns and driving behavior.
Methods and results: Data were retrieved from a nationwide survey on driving restrictions in Danish ICD patients, distributed in 2017 to all patients ≥18 years implanted with a first-time ICD from 2013-2016 (n=3913). Responses were linked with data from nationwide registers. The response rate was 71% (final analyzable population n=2741, 83% male, median age 67 years, 316 had experienced an ICD shock, and 911 patients reported receipt of driving restrictions of minimum 1 month). Among active professional drivers (n=175), 33% had lost their job as a direct consequence of the driving restrictions. Of those working prior to ICD implantation (n=465), 47% reported being limited in maintaining employment due to private driving restrictions. Among those restricted from driving minimum 1 month, 26% reported the restrictions overall had substantially impeded their daily living. Factors associated with substantial impediment were age <65 years (OR 1.84 [95% CI 1.35-2.52]), higher income (OR 1.47 [95% CI 1.05-2.05]) and driving ≥7 hours/week pre-implantation (OR 1.66 [95% CI 1.23-2.24]). Being nervous about driving or altering driving habits was reported by 3-7%.
Conclusion: Both professional and private driving restrictions affect the ability to maintain employment and have a negative impact on ICD recipients' daily living activities.
期刊介绍:
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.