一项质量改进项目,评估 "吃、睡、控制 "对护士和患有新生儿戒断综合症的新生儿的影响。

Tia Cooney, Jacqueline Larizza, Ursula Cote, Anne-Sophie Gervais, Lindsey Rae, Joel Warkentin, Sacha Dubois
{"title":"一项质量改进项目,评估 \"吃、睡、控制 \"对护士和患有新生儿戒断综合症的新生儿的影响。","authors":"Tia Cooney,&nbsp;Jacqueline Larizza,&nbsp;Ursula Cote,&nbsp;Anne-Sophie Gervais,&nbsp;Lindsey Rae,&nbsp;Joel Warkentin,&nbsp;Sacha Dubois","doi":"10.1016/j.nwh.2024.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To improve neonatal outcomes through the implementation of an eat, sleep, console (ESC) assessment and change in hospital policy regarding the monitoring requirements for pharmacologic treatment of neonates with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective chart review and descriptive survey design.</div></div><div><h3>Setting/Local Problem</h3><div>A hospital in Northwestern Ontario, where an evidence-based practice change was undertaken to improve care for neonates with NAS.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Neonates being screened for NAS during the Modified Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Scoring System (MFNASSS) protocol (<em>n</em> = 75) and ESC protocol (<em>n</em> = 40). Nurses working in the departments after the implementation of ESC were surveyed.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>Length of stay (LOS) and morphine administration by intervention status using unadjusted hazard and risk ratios, respectively. Descriptive statistics are also presented. A one-sample <em>t</em> test was completed for the nurses’ perspectives survey questions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Reduced rate of LOS (<em>HR</em> = 1.66, 95% confidence interval [1.1, 2.51]) was observed for participants receiving the ESC intervention (4.53, <em>SD</em> = 1.94), compared to the MFNASSS control (7.45, <em>SD</em> = 6.35). Although the ESC group appeared to have a greater proportion of neonates administered morphine (42.5% ESC vs. 26.7% MFNASSS), the relative risk was not statistically significant (<em>RR</em> = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [0.95, 1.72]). Morphine doses per day were reduced in the ESC group (0.37, <em>SD</em> = 1.50) compared to the MFNASSS group (5.16, <em>SD</em> = 1.02). Overall, the nurses had a positive perspective on the policy change.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ESC was successfully implemented in a Northwestern Ontario hospital. The overall LOS of neonates with NAS decreased. Nurses found the policy change to be safe and attainable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39985,"journal":{"name":"Nursing for Women''s Health","volume":"28 5","pages":"Pages 329-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Quality Improvement Project Evaluating the Effects of Eat, Sleep, Console on Nurses and on Neonates With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Tia Cooney,&nbsp;Jacqueline Larizza,&nbsp;Ursula Cote,&nbsp;Anne-Sophie Gervais,&nbsp;Lindsey Rae,&nbsp;Joel Warkentin,&nbsp;Sacha Dubois\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nwh.2024.02.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To improve neonatal outcomes through the implementation of an eat, sleep, console (ESC) assessment and change in hospital policy regarding the monitoring requirements for pharmacologic treatment of neonates with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective chart review and descriptive survey design.</div></div><div><h3>Setting/Local Problem</h3><div>A hospital in Northwestern Ontario, where an evidence-based practice change was undertaken to improve care for neonates with NAS.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Neonates being screened for NAS during the Modified Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Scoring System (MFNASSS) protocol (<em>n</em> = 75) and ESC protocol (<em>n</em> = 40). Nurses working in the departments after the implementation of ESC were surveyed.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>Length of stay (LOS) and morphine administration by intervention status using unadjusted hazard and risk ratios, respectively. Descriptive statistics are also presented. A one-sample <em>t</em> test was completed for the nurses’ perspectives survey questions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Reduced rate of LOS (<em>HR</em> = 1.66, 95% confidence interval [1.1, 2.51]) was observed for participants receiving the ESC intervention (4.53, <em>SD</em> = 1.94), compared to the MFNASSS control (7.45, <em>SD</em> = 6.35). Although the ESC group appeared to have a greater proportion of neonates administered morphine (42.5% ESC vs. 26.7% MFNASSS), the relative risk was not statistically significant (<em>RR</em> = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [0.95, 1.72]). Morphine doses per day were reduced in the ESC group (0.37, <em>SD</em> = 1.50) compared to the MFNASSS group (5.16, <em>SD</em> = 1.02). Overall, the nurses had a positive perspective on the policy change.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ESC was successfully implemented in a Northwestern Ontario hospital. The overall LOS of neonates with NAS decreased. Nurses found the policy change to be safe and attainable.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing for Women''s Health\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 329-338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing for Women''s Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751485124001272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing for Women''s Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751485124001272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过对患有新生儿禁欲综合征(NAS)的新生儿实施 "吃、睡、控制"(ESC)评估并改变医院对药物治疗监测要求的政策,改善新生儿的预后:背景/当地问题:安大略省西北部的一家医院决定实施一项循证实践变革,以更好地护理患有 NAS 的新生儿:在改良芬尼根新生儿窒息综合征评分系统(MFNASSS)方案(n = 75)和ESC方案(n = 40)中接受NAS筛查的新生儿。对实施 ESC 后在这些科室工作的护士进行了调查:测量:住院时间(LOS)和吗啡用量,按干预状态分别使用未经调整的危险比和风险比。此外还提供了描述性统计数字。对护士的观点调查问题进行了单样本 t 检验:与 MFNASSS 对照组(7.45,SD = 6.35)相比,接受 ESC 干预(4.53,SD = 1.94)的参与者的 LOS 率有所降低(HR = 1.66,95% 置信区间 [1.1,2.51])。虽然ESC组使用吗啡的新生儿比例更高(42.5% ESC vs. 26.7% MFNASSS),但相对风险在统计学上并不显著(RR = 1.28,95% 置信区间 [0.95,1.72])。与 MFNASSS 组(5.16,SD = 1.02)相比,ESC 组每天的吗啡剂量减少了(0.37,SD = 1.50)。总的来说,护士们对政策变化持积极态度:安大略省西北部的一家医院成功实施了ESC。患有 NAS 的新生儿的总住院日有所缩短。护士们认为政策改变是安全和可实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Quality Improvement Project Evaluating the Effects of Eat, Sleep, Console on Nurses and on Neonates With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome

Objective

To improve neonatal outcomes through the implementation of an eat, sleep, console (ESC) assessment and change in hospital policy regarding the monitoring requirements for pharmacologic treatment of neonates with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS).

Design

Retrospective chart review and descriptive survey design.

Setting/Local Problem

A hospital in Northwestern Ontario, where an evidence-based practice change was undertaken to improve care for neonates with NAS.

Participants

Neonates being screened for NAS during the Modified Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Scoring System (MFNASSS) protocol (n = 75) and ESC protocol (n = 40). Nurses working in the departments after the implementation of ESC were surveyed.

Measurements

Length of stay (LOS) and morphine administration by intervention status using unadjusted hazard and risk ratios, respectively. Descriptive statistics are also presented. A one-sample t test was completed for the nurses’ perspectives survey questions.

Results

Reduced rate of LOS (HR = 1.66, 95% confidence interval [1.1, 2.51]) was observed for participants receiving the ESC intervention (4.53, SD = 1.94), compared to the MFNASSS control (7.45, SD = 6.35). Although the ESC group appeared to have a greater proportion of neonates administered morphine (42.5% ESC vs. 26.7% MFNASSS), the relative risk was not statistically significant (RR = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [0.95, 1.72]). Morphine doses per day were reduced in the ESC group (0.37, SD = 1.50) compared to the MFNASSS group (5.16, SD = 1.02). Overall, the nurses had a positive perspective on the policy change.

Conclusion

ESC was successfully implemented in a Northwestern Ontario hospital. The overall LOS of neonates with NAS decreased. Nurses found the policy change to be safe and attainable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing for Women''s Health
Nursing for Women''s Health Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Nursing for Women"s Health publishes the most recent and compelling health care information on women"s health, newborn care and professional nursing issues. As a refereed, clinical practice journal, it provides professionals involved in providing optimum nursing care for women and their newborns with health care trends and everyday issues in a concise, practical, and easy-to-read format.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Screening Women for Intimate Partner Violence Among Health Care Providers in Thailand. A Guide to Successfully Publishing a Clinical Practice Manuscript. Evaluation of a Menstrual Hygiene Education Program for Adolescent Girls in Rural India. The Experiences of Pregnancy Among Adolescent Girls in Jordan. Implementation of Genetic Carrier Screening at Gynecologic-Related Visits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1