6 岁以下 HEADS-ED:试行一种新的社区心理健康和发育筛查及幼儿分流工具。

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Infant Mental Health Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1002/imhj.22131
Christine Polihronis, Paula Cloutier, Lori Kempe, Joel Schryer, Mario Cappelli
{"title":"6 岁以下 HEADS-ED:试行一种新的社区心理健康和发育筛查及幼儿分流工具。","authors":"Christine Polihronis,&nbsp;Paula Cloutier,&nbsp;Lori Kempe,&nbsp;Joel Schryer,&nbsp;Mario Cappelli","doi":"10.1002/imhj.22131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Communimetric screening tools help clinicians identify and communicate their patient's areas of need and the corresponding level of action. However, few tools exist to identify mental health (MH) and developmental needs in young children. We aimed to implement and evaluate a new communimetric MH and developmental screening tool for children under 6 (HEADS-ED Under 6) in a community MH agency in Ontario, Canada. Using a prospective cohort design, we explored how intake workers used the HEADS-ED Under 6 screening tool from November 2019 to March 2021. 94.5% of children (<i>n</i> = 535/566) were screened with the HEADS-ED at intake. Total HEADS-ED scores and domains were used to inform the intensity of recommended services. Three clinical domains (Eating &amp; sleeping, Development, speech/language/motor, and Emotions &amp; behaviors) also independently predicted a priority recommendation. The tool showed good concordance with the InterRAI Early Years for children under 4 years old. The HEADS-ED Under 6 was a brief, easy, and valid screening tool, and can be used to identify important MH and developmental domains early, rate level of action/impairment, communicate severity of needs, and help determine intensity of service required.</p>","PeriodicalId":48026,"journal":{"name":"Infant Mental Health Journal","volume":"45 5","pages":"557-568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/imhj.22131","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The HEADS-ED under 6: Piloting a new communimetric mental health and developmental screening and triage tool for young children\",\"authors\":\"Christine Polihronis,&nbsp;Paula Cloutier,&nbsp;Lori Kempe,&nbsp;Joel Schryer,&nbsp;Mario Cappelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/imhj.22131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Communimetric screening tools help clinicians identify and communicate their patient's areas of need and the corresponding level of action. However, few tools exist to identify mental health (MH) and developmental needs in young children. We aimed to implement and evaluate a new communimetric MH and developmental screening tool for children under 6 (HEADS-ED Under 6) in a community MH agency in Ontario, Canada. Using a prospective cohort design, we explored how intake workers used the HEADS-ED Under 6 screening tool from November 2019 to March 2021. 94.5% of children (<i>n</i> = 535/566) were screened with the HEADS-ED at intake. Total HEADS-ED scores and domains were used to inform the intensity of recommended services. Three clinical domains (Eating &amp; sleeping, Development, speech/language/motor, and Emotions &amp; behaviors) also independently predicted a priority recommendation. The tool showed good concordance with the InterRAI Early Years for children under 4 years old. The HEADS-ED Under 6 was a brief, easy, and valid screening tool, and can be used to identify important MH and developmental domains early, rate level of action/impairment, communicate severity of needs, and help determine intensity of service required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infant Mental Health Journal\",\"volume\":\"45 5\",\"pages\":\"557-568\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/imhj.22131\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infant Mental Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/imhj.22131\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/imhj.22131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医患沟通筛查工具可帮助临床医生识别和交流患者的需求领域以及相应的行动水平。然而,用于识别幼儿心理健康(MH)和发育需求的工具却寥寥无几。我们的目标是在加拿大安大略省的一家社区精神卫生机构实施并评估一种针对 6 岁以下儿童的新型社区精神卫生和发育筛查工具(HEADS-ED Under 6)。我们采用前瞻性队列设计,探讨了在 2019 年 11 月至 2021 年 3 月期间,接诊人员如何使用 HEADS-ED 6 岁以下儿童筛查工具。94.5%的儿童(n = 535/566)在入院时接受了 HEADS-ED 筛查。HEADS-ED 的总分和领域用于确定推荐服务的强度。三个临床领域(进食与睡眠、发育、言语/语言/运动、情绪与行为)也可独立预测优先建议。该工具与针对 4 岁以下儿童的 InterRAI Early Years(国际儿童早期评估指标)显示出良好的一致性。HEADS-ED 6 岁以下儿童筛查工具简明、易用且有效,可用于早期识别重要的心理健康和发育领域、评定行动/损伤程度、传达需求的严重程度,并帮助确定所需服务的强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The HEADS-ED under 6: Piloting a new communimetric mental health and developmental screening and triage tool for young children

Communimetric screening tools help clinicians identify and communicate their patient's areas of need and the corresponding level of action. However, few tools exist to identify mental health (MH) and developmental needs in young children. We aimed to implement and evaluate a new communimetric MH and developmental screening tool for children under 6 (HEADS-ED Under 6) in a community MH agency in Ontario, Canada. Using a prospective cohort design, we explored how intake workers used the HEADS-ED Under 6 screening tool from November 2019 to March 2021. 94.5% of children (n = 535/566) were screened with the HEADS-ED at intake. Total HEADS-ED scores and domains were used to inform the intensity of recommended services. Three clinical domains (Eating & sleeping, Development, speech/language/motor, and Emotions & behaviors) also independently predicted a priority recommendation. The tool showed good concordance with the InterRAI Early Years for children under 4 years old. The HEADS-ED Under 6 was a brief, easy, and valid screening tool, and can be used to identify important MH and developmental domains early, rate level of action/impairment, communicate severity of needs, and help determine intensity of service required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infant Mental Health Journal
Infant Mental Health Journal PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Infant Mental Health Journal (IMHJ) is the official publication of the World Association for Infant Mental Health (WAIMH) and the Michigan Association for Infant Mental Health (MI-AIMH) and is copyrighted by MI-AIMH. The Infant Mental Health Journal publishes peer-reviewed research articles, literature reviews, program descriptions/evaluations, theoretical/conceptual papers and brief reports (clinical case studies and novel pilot studies) that focus on early social and emotional development and characteristics that influence social-emotional development from relationship-based perspectives. Examples of such influences include attachment relationships, early relationship development, caregiver-infant interactions, infant and early childhood mental health services, contextual and cultural influences on infant/toddler/child and family development, including parental/caregiver psychosocial characteristics and attachment history, prenatal experiences, and biological characteristics in interaction with relational environments that promote optimal social-emotional development or place it at higher risk. Research published in IMHJ focuses on the prenatal-age 5 period and employs relationship-based perspectives in key research questions and interpretation and implications of findings.
期刊最新文献
A systematic review and meta-analysis of parental mentalization in fathers and mothers. Validating the parental reflective functioning questionnaire - infant version using a rasch model. One state's journey with a reflective supervision professional development series: Development, implementation, and adaptation. Intergenerational impacts of racial discrimination on child executive functioning problems. Transaction of parental cognition, stress and depressive symptoms, and infant regulatory challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1