Dan Curley MBBS, Leigh Kinsman PhD, Graeme Mooney MSW, Gail Whiteford PhD, Tony Lower PhD, Megan Hobbs PhD, Beverley Morris BN, Kerry Bartlett BHSc, Alycia Jacob BL
{"title":"一项横断面研究评估了一个农村医疗区对预先护理指令的遵从情况。","authors":"Dan Curley MBBS, Leigh Kinsman PhD, Graeme Mooney MSW, Gail Whiteford PhD, Tony Lower PhD, Megan Hobbs PhD, Beverley Morris BN, Kerry Bartlett BHSc, Alycia Jacob BL","doi":"10.1111/ajr.13166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To measure compliance with Advance Care Directives (ACDs) for decedents in a rural setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Observational, cross-sectional medical records audit comparing requests in ACDs with actual outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Rural Australian coastal district.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>People who had an ACD, died during the study period (30 May 2020 to 15 December 2021) and participated in a local research project.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3>\n \n <p>Compliance was measured by comparing stated requests in the ACD with outcomes recorded in medical records. This included the place of death and a list of ‘unacceptable interventions’.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty-eight people met the inclusion criteria (age range of 46–92 [mean 67 years; median 74 years]; 42 [62%] male). The main cause of death was cancer (<i>n</i> = 48; 71%). Preferred place of death was not stated in 16 ACDs. Compliance with documented preferred place of death was 63% (33/52): 48% (16/33) when the preferred place of death was home; 78% (7/9) when sub-acute was preferred; and 100% (10/10) when hospital was preferred. Compliance was 100% with ‘unacceptable interventions’.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These results demonstrate strong compliance with rural patients' requests in ACDs, particularly ‘unacceptable interventions’. Home was the most common preferred place of death, but the compliance measure (48%) was the lowest in this study. This requires further exploration.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":"32 5","pages":"969-975"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.13166","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cross-sectional study assessing concordance with advance care directives in a rural health district\",\"authors\":\"Dan Curley MBBS, Leigh Kinsman PhD, Graeme Mooney MSW, Gail Whiteford PhD, Tony Lower PhD, Megan Hobbs PhD, Beverley Morris BN, Kerry Bartlett BHSc, Alycia Jacob BL\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajr.13166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To measure compliance with Advance Care Directives (ACDs) for decedents in a rural setting.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Observational, cross-sectional medical records audit comparing requests in ACDs with actual outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>Rural Australian coastal district.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>People who had an ACD, died during the study period (30 May 2020 to 15 December 2021) and participated in a local research project.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3>\\n \\n <p>Compliance was measured by comparing stated requests in the ACD with outcomes recorded in medical records. This included the place of death and a list of ‘unacceptable interventions’.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sixty-eight people met the inclusion criteria (age range of 46–92 [mean 67 years; median 74 years]; 42 [62%] male). The main cause of death was cancer (<i>n</i> = 48; 71%). Preferred place of death was not stated in 16 ACDs. Compliance with documented preferred place of death was 63% (33/52): 48% (16/33) when the preferred place of death was home; 78% (7/9) when sub-acute was preferred; and 100% (10/10) when hospital was preferred. Compliance was 100% with ‘unacceptable interventions’.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>These results demonstrate strong compliance with rural patients' requests in ACDs, particularly ‘unacceptable interventions’. Home was the most common preferred place of death, but the compliance measure (48%) was the lowest in this study. This requires further exploration.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"969-975\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.13166\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.13166\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.13166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
A cross-sectional study assessing concordance with advance care directives in a rural health district
Objective
To measure compliance with Advance Care Directives (ACDs) for decedents in a rural setting.
Design
Observational, cross-sectional medical records audit comparing requests in ACDs with actual outcomes.
Setting
Rural Australian coastal district.
Participants
People who had an ACD, died during the study period (30 May 2020 to 15 December 2021) and participated in a local research project.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Compliance was measured by comparing stated requests in the ACD with outcomes recorded in medical records. This included the place of death and a list of ‘unacceptable interventions’.
Results
Sixty-eight people met the inclusion criteria (age range of 46–92 [mean 67 years; median 74 years]; 42 [62%] male). The main cause of death was cancer (n = 48; 71%). Preferred place of death was not stated in 16 ACDs. Compliance with documented preferred place of death was 63% (33/52): 48% (16/33) when the preferred place of death was home; 78% (7/9) when sub-acute was preferred; and 100% (10/10) when hospital was preferred. Compliance was 100% with ‘unacceptable interventions’.
Conclusion
These results demonstrate strong compliance with rural patients' requests in ACDs, particularly ‘unacceptable interventions’. Home was the most common preferred place of death, but the compliance measure (48%) was the lowest in this study. This requires further exploration.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.