Virginia-Arlene Go M.D. , Jeffery Chavez , Randal D. Robinson M.D. , Bruce J. Nicholson Ph.D.
{"title":"早期子宫内膜异位症中的种子或土壤问题:基质细胞来源比间皮细胞来源更能驱动细胞入侵和耦合。","authors":"Virginia-Arlene Go M.D. , Jeffery Chavez , Randal D. Robinson M.D. , Bruce J. Nicholson Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfss.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To study the role of the mesothelial cells in early endometriosis lesion formation by assessing in vitro cell-to-cell communication and invasion of endometrial cells across a mesothelial cell monolayer, with both cell types derived from both patients with endometriosis and control patients.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Laboratory-based experimental study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>University hospital and laboratory.</div></div><div><h3>Patient(s)</h3><div>Consenting reproductive-age women who underwent laparoscopy for gynecologic reasons and were confirmed to have either endometriosis with pathology tissue diagnosis (n = 8) or no endometriosis n = 8) at the time of surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Intervention(s)</h3><div>Primary stromal cells cultured from endometrial pipelle biopsies and primary mesothelial cells cultured from peritoneal explants were used in transmesothelial invasion assays and gap junction coupling assays.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><div>Comparison of potential for lesion formation, using in vitro models, of both primary endometrial and mesothelial cells from patients with endometriosis and control patients, establishing the former as the primary disease driver.</div></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><div>When comparing mesothelial cells from control patients with those from patients with endometriosis, there was no significant difference in the amount of stromal cell invasion across either barrier. In contrast, when comparing stromal cell origin, the amount of invasion by endometriosis stromal cells was greater than control stromal cells regardless of whether the mesothelial cell monolayer was derived from patients with the disease or control patients. Additionally, primary mesothelial cells induced more gap junction coupling, a requirement for invasion, in stromal cells from patients with endometriosis than control patients, again independent of mesothelial origin. The notable exception was mesothelial cells derived from endometriotic lesion-affected areas that showed depressed ability to support invasion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><div>Although both endometrial and mesothelial cells need to function for establishment of endometriosis lesions, the endometrium seems to be the key player, serving as an ideal target for diagnostic strategies and therapeutic intervention. While this notion is consistent with previous studies, to our knowledge, we are the first to directly test both primary mesothelial and endometrial cells from patients with endometriosis and control patients to compare propensities for mesothelial invasion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73012,"journal":{"name":"F&S science","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 395-403"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A seed or soil problem in early endometriosis: stromal cell origin drives cellular invasion and coupling over mesothelial cell origin\",\"authors\":\"Virginia-Arlene Go M.D. , Jeffery Chavez , Randal D. Robinson M.D. , Bruce J. Nicholson Ph.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xfss.2024.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To study the role of the mesothelial cells in early endometriosis lesion formation by assessing in vitro cell-to-cell communication and invasion of endometrial cells across a mesothelial cell monolayer, with both cell types derived from both patients with endometriosis and control patients.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Laboratory-based experimental study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>University hospital and laboratory.</div></div><div><h3>Patient(s)</h3><div>Consenting reproductive-age women who underwent laparoscopy for gynecologic reasons and were confirmed to have either endometriosis with pathology tissue diagnosis (n = 8) or no endometriosis n = 8) at the time of surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Intervention(s)</h3><div>Primary stromal cells cultured from endometrial pipelle biopsies and primary mesothelial cells cultured from peritoneal explants were used in transmesothelial invasion assays and gap junction coupling assays.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><div>Comparison of potential for lesion formation, using in vitro models, of both primary endometrial and mesothelial cells from patients with endometriosis and control patients, establishing the former as the primary disease driver.</div></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><div>When comparing mesothelial cells from control patients with those from patients with endometriosis, there was no significant difference in the amount of stromal cell invasion across either barrier. In contrast, when comparing stromal cell origin, the amount of invasion by endometriosis stromal cells was greater than control stromal cells regardless of whether the mesothelial cell monolayer was derived from patients with the disease or control patients. Additionally, primary mesothelial cells induced more gap junction coupling, a requirement for invasion, in stromal cells from patients with endometriosis than control patients, again independent of mesothelial origin. The notable exception was mesothelial cells derived from endometriotic lesion-affected areas that showed depressed ability to support invasion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><div>Although both endometrial and mesothelial cells need to function for establishment of endometriosis lesions, the endometrium seems to be the key player, serving as an ideal target for diagnostic strategies and therapeutic intervention. While this notion is consistent with previous studies, to our knowledge, we are the first to directly test both primary mesothelial and endometrial cells from patients with endometriosis and control patients to compare propensities for mesothelial invasion.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"F&S science\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 395-403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"F&S science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666335X24000533\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F&S science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666335X24000533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A seed or soil problem in early endometriosis: stromal cell origin drives cellular invasion and coupling over mesothelial cell origin
Objective
To study the role of the mesothelial cells in early endometriosis lesion formation by assessing in vitro cell-to-cell communication and invasion of endometrial cells across a mesothelial cell monolayer, with both cell types derived from both patients with endometriosis and control patients.
Design
Laboratory-based experimental study.
Setting
University hospital and laboratory.
Patient(s)
Consenting reproductive-age women who underwent laparoscopy for gynecologic reasons and were confirmed to have either endometriosis with pathology tissue diagnosis (n = 8) or no endometriosis n = 8) at the time of surgery.
Intervention(s)
Primary stromal cells cultured from endometrial pipelle biopsies and primary mesothelial cells cultured from peritoneal explants were used in transmesothelial invasion assays and gap junction coupling assays.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Comparison of potential for lesion formation, using in vitro models, of both primary endometrial and mesothelial cells from patients with endometriosis and control patients, establishing the former as the primary disease driver.
Result(s)
When comparing mesothelial cells from control patients with those from patients with endometriosis, there was no significant difference in the amount of stromal cell invasion across either barrier. In contrast, when comparing stromal cell origin, the amount of invasion by endometriosis stromal cells was greater than control stromal cells regardless of whether the mesothelial cell monolayer was derived from patients with the disease or control patients. Additionally, primary mesothelial cells induced more gap junction coupling, a requirement for invasion, in stromal cells from patients with endometriosis than control patients, again independent of mesothelial origin. The notable exception was mesothelial cells derived from endometriotic lesion-affected areas that showed depressed ability to support invasion.
Conclusion(s)
Although both endometrial and mesothelial cells need to function for establishment of endometriosis lesions, the endometrium seems to be the key player, serving as an ideal target for diagnostic strategies and therapeutic intervention. While this notion is consistent with previous studies, to our knowledge, we are the first to directly test both primary mesothelial and endometrial cells from patients with endometriosis and control patients to compare propensities for mesothelial invasion.