非脊柱并发症与神经性腰背痛之间的关系。- 进一步揭示背痛背景下疼痛的复杂性。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1177/21925682241276441
Stone Sima, Samuel Lapkin, Zachary Gan, Ashish D Diwan
{"title":"非脊柱并发症与神经性腰背痛之间的关系。- 进一步揭示背痛背景下疼痛的复杂性。","authors":"Stone Sima, Samuel Lapkin, Zachary Gan, Ashish D Diwan","doi":"10.1177/21925682241276441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Understanding the complex nature of low back pain (LBP) is crucial for effective management. The PainDETECT questionnaire is a tool that distinguishes between neuropathic (NeP) and nociceptive (NoP) low back pain. Traditionally NeP and NoP have been primarily attributed to patho-anatomical abnormalities within the lumbar spine. However, increasing evidence points to multifaceted involvement, encompassing a range of physical, biomechanical, chemical, and psychosocial factors. The study aimed to determine the independent relationship between NeP as assessed by the PainDETECT questionnaire and non-spinal comorbid medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 400 patients suffering from chronic LBP (>6months), aged >18 years, who complete the PainDETECT questionnaire and provided responses regarding the presence of any comorbid conditions. A binary logistic regression model was used to analyse the confounding status of comorbid medical conditions and pain severity measured by NRS to determine independent relationships between specific conditions and neuropathic pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 143 and 257 patients suffering from NeP and NoP, respectively. The NeP group had a 38% higher mean numerical rating scale score compared to the NoP group (8.10 <math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math> 1.55 vs 5.86<math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math> 2.26, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The odds of developing NeP were 2.9 Exp(B) = 2.844, 95%C.I. [1.426-5.670], <i>P</i> < 0.01), 2.7 (Exp(B) = 2.726, 95%C.I. [1.183-6.283], <i>P</i> < 0.05) and 2.8 (Exp(B) = 2.847, 95%C.I. [1.473-5.503], <i>P</i> < 0.05) times higher in patients suffering from gastrointestinal conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, and depression, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NeP as determined by the PainDETECT questionnaire, is associated with gastrointestinal conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, and depression. This pioneering study has shed light on the potential involvement of the gut microbiome as a common factor connecting non-spinal comorbidities and NeP. These findings underscore the importance of formulating personalized management plans tailored to individual pain and medical profiles, rather than relying on a blanket approach to pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Non-spinal Comorbid Medical Conditions and Neuropathic Low Back Pain. - A Further Unravelling of Pain Complexities in the Context of Back Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Stone Sima, Samuel Lapkin, Zachary Gan, Ashish D Diwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682241276441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Understanding the complex nature of low back pain (LBP) is crucial for effective management. The PainDETECT questionnaire is a tool that distinguishes between neuropathic (NeP) and nociceptive (NoP) low back pain. Traditionally NeP and NoP have been primarily attributed to patho-anatomical abnormalities within the lumbar spine. However, increasing evidence points to multifaceted involvement, encompassing a range of physical, biomechanical, chemical, and psychosocial factors. The study aimed to determine the independent relationship between NeP as assessed by the PainDETECT questionnaire and non-spinal comorbid medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 400 patients suffering from chronic LBP (>6months), aged >18 years, who complete the PainDETECT questionnaire and provided responses regarding the presence of any comorbid conditions. A binary logistic regression model was used to analyse the confounding status of comorbid medical conditions and pain severity measured by NRS to determine independent relationships between specific conditions and neuropathic pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 143 and 257 patients suffering from NeP and NoP, respectively. The NeP group had a 38% higher mean numerical rating scale score compared to the NoP group (8.10 <math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math> 1.55 vs 5.86<math><mrow><mo>±</mo></mrow></math> 2.26, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The odds of developing NeP were 2.9 Exp(B) = 2.844, 95%C.I. [1.426-5.670], <i>P</i> < 0.01), 2.7 (Exp(B) = 2.726, 95%C.I. [1.183-6.283], <i>P</i> < 0.05) and 2.8 (Exp(B) = 2.847, 95%C.I. [1.473-5.503], <i>P</i> < 0.05) times higher in patients suffering from gastrointestinal conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, and depression, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NeP as determined by the PainDETECT questionnaire, is associated with gastrointestinal conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, and depression. This pioneering study has shed light on the potential involvement of the gut microbiome as a common factor connecting non-spinal comorbidities and NeP. These findings underscore the importance of formulating personalized management plans tailored to individual pain and medical profiles, rather than relying on a blanket approach to pain management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241276441\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241276441","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计前瞻性队列研究:了解腰背痛(LBP)的复杂性对于有效治疗至关重要。疼痛检测问卷(PainDETECT)是一种区分神经性(NeP)和痛觉性(NoP)腰背痛的工具。传统上,NeP 和 NoP 主要归因于腰椎的病理解剖异常。然而,越来越多的证据表明,这与多方面的因素有关,包括一系列物理、生物力学、化学和社会心理因素。本研究旨在确定由疼痛 DETECT 问卷评估的 NeP 与非脊柱合并症之间的独立关系:这项前瞻性队列研究涉及 400 名年龄大于 18 岁的慢性腰椎间盘突出症(超过 6 个月)患者,他们填写了疼痛 DETECT 问卷,并回答了是否存在任何合并症。研究人员使用二元逻辑回归模型分析了合并症与 NRS 测量的疼痛严重程度之间的混杂状态,以确定特定条件与神经病理性疼痛之间的独立关系:研究分别纳入了143名和257名NeP和NoP患者。NeP组患者的数字评分量表平均得分比NoP组高38%(8.10±1.55 vs 5.86±2.26,P<0.001)。患 NeP 的几率分别为 2.9 Exp(B) = 2.844,95%C.I. [1.426-5.670],P < 0.01)、2.7(Exp(B) = 2.726,95%C.I. [1.183-6.283],P < 0.05)和 2.8(Exp(B) = 2.847,95%C.I. [1.473-5.503],P <0.05)倍:结论:由疼痛 DETECT 问卷确定的 NeP 与胃肠道疾病、类风湿性关节炎和抑郁症有关。这项开创性的研究揭示了肠道微生物组可能是连接非脊柱并发症和 NeP 的共同因素。这些发现强调了针对个人疼痛和病情制定个性化管理计划的重要性,而不是依靠一刀切的疼痛管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association Between Non-spinal Comorbid Medical Conditions and Neuropathic Low Back Pain. - A Further Unravelling of Pain Complexities in the Context of Back Pain.

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Objective: Understanding the complex nature of low back pain (LBP) is crucial for effective management. The PainDETECT questionnaire is a tool that distinguishes between neuropathic (NeP) and nociceptive (NoP) low back pain. Traditionally NeP and NoP have been primarily attributed to patho-anatomical abnormalities within the lumbar spine. However, increasing evidence points to multifaceted involvement, encompassing a range of physical, biomechanical, chemical, and psychosocial factors. The study aimed to determine the independent relationship between NeP as assessed by the PainDETECT questionnaire and non-spinal comorbid medical conditions.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 400 patients suffering from chronic LBP (>6months), aged >18 years, who complete the PainDETECT questionnaire and provided responses regarding the presence of any comorbid conditions. A binary logistic regression model was used to analyse the confounding status of comorbid medical conditions and pain severity measured by NRS to determine independent relationships between specific conditions and neuropathic pain.

Results: The study included 143 and 257 patients suffering from NeP and NoP, respectively. The NeP group had a 38% higher mean numerical rating scale score compared to the NoP group (8.10 ± 1.55 vs 5.86± 2.26, P < 0.001). The odds of developing NeP were 2.9 Exp(B) = 2.844, 95%C.I. [1.426-5.670], P < 0.01), 2.7 (Exp(B) = 2.726, 95%C.I. [1.183-6.283], P < 0.05) and 2.8 (Exp(B) = 2.847, 95%C.I. [1.473-5.503], P < 0.05) times higher in patients suffering from gastrointestinal conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, and depression, respectively.

Conclusion: NeP as determined by the PainDETECT questionnaire, is associated with gastrointestinal conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, and depression. This pioneering study has shed light on the potential involvement of the gut microbiome as a common factor connecting non-spinal comorbidities and NeP. These findings underscore the importance of formulating personalized management plans tailored to individual pain and medical profiles, rather than relying on a blanket approach to pain management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Coronal Malalignment Following Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgery (CMIS) for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction. Current Applications and Future Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery and Research: A Narrative Review and Commentary. Surgical Specialty Outcome Differences for Major Spinal Procedures in Low-Acuity Patients. The Effect of Osteopenia and Osteoporosis on Screw Loosening in MIS-TLIF and Dynamic Stabilization. Learning Curve of Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant and Aggregated Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1