智利学童的心肺功能和社会经济影响:一项横断面研究。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Jornal de pediatria Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jped.2024.06.010
Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda , Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez , Josivaldo de Souza-Lima , Gerson Ferrari , Juan Hurtado-Almonacid , Juan Pablo Zavala-Crichton , Claudio Hinojosa-Torres , Tomás Reyes-Amigo , Jacqueline Páez-Herrera , Guillermo Cortés-Roco , Pedro Valdivia-Moral , Jorge Olivares-Arancibia , Sandra Mahecha-Matsudo
{"title":"智利学童的心肺功能和社会经济影响:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda ,&nbsp;Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez ,&nbsp;Josivaldo de Souza-Lima ,&nbsp;Gerson Ferrari ,&nbsp;Juan Hurtado-Almonacid ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Zavala-Crichton ,&nbsp;Claudio Hinojosa-Torres ,&nbsp;Tomás Reyes-Amigo ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Páez-Herrera ,&nbsp;Guillermo Cortés-Roco ,&nbsp;Pedro Valdivia-Moral ,&nbsp;Jorge Olivares-Arancibia ,&nbsp;Sandra Mahecha-Matsudo","doi":"10.1016/j.jped.2024.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the cardiovascular risk and physical fitness, according to type of school in a national sample of Chilean school students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 7,218 students participated, who completed all the national tests of the National System for Measuring the Quality of Education, which included physical fitness and anthropometric tests. The results were compared according to the type of educational establishment and anthropometric indicators were considered. Physical fitness was measured by lower extremity strength, abdominal strength, upper extremity strength, trunk flexibility, exertional heart rate, and cardiorespiratory fitness. Body mass index, heart rate, and waist-to-height ratio were analyzed as predictors of cardiovascular risk.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were differences according to the type of establishment in the predictors of cardiovascular risk (p &lt; 0.05). Differences were also found in the physical fitness tests evaluated (p &lt; 0.01). Students in private schools (PSC) and subsidized schools (SC) had lower levels of cardiovascular risk and higher levels of physical fitness than public schools (PS) and schools with delegated administration (DA).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, students in educational establishments with a higher socioeconomic level have lower levels of cardiovascular risk and better physical fitness than students in public establishments. The authors suggest considering specific school interventions to mitigate cardiovascular risk and improve physical fitness among this vulnerable population. To this end, future studies should analyze the characteristics of physical activity and nutritional habits in schools to determine the factors that affect the results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14867,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de pediatria","volume":"100 6","pages":"Pages 660-666"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiorespiratory fitness and socioeconomic influences in Chilean schoolchildren: a cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda ,&nbsp;Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez ,&nbsp;Josivaldo de Souza-Lima ,&nbsp;Gerson Ferrari ,&nbsp;Juan Hurtado-Almonacid ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Zavala-Crichton ,&nbsp;Claudio Hinojosa-Torres ,&nbsp;Tomás Reyes-Amigo ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Páez-Herrera ,&nbsp;Guillermo Cortés-Roco ,&nbsp;Pedro Valdivia-Moral ,&nbsp;Jorge Olivares-Arancibia ,&nbsp;Sandra Mahecha-Matsudo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jped.2024.06.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare the cardiovascular risk and physical fitness, according to type of school in a national sample of Chilean school students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 7,218 students participated, who completed all the national tests of the National System for Measuring the Quality of Education, which included physical fitness and anthropometric tests. The results were compared according to the type of educational establishment and anthropometric indicators were considered. Physical fitness was measured by lower extremity strength, abdominal strength, upper extremity strength, trunk flexibility, exertional heart rate, and cardiorespiratory fitness. Body mass index, heart rate, and waist-to-height ratio were analyzed as predictors of cardiovascular risk.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were differences according to the type of establishment in the predictors of cardiovascular risk (p &lt; 0.05). Differences were also found in the physical fitness tests evaluated (p &lt; 0.01). Students in private schools (PSC) and subsidized schools (SC) had lower levels of cardiovascular risk and higher levels of physical fitness than public schools (PS) and schools with delegated administration (DA).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, students in educational establishments with a higher socioeconomic level have lower levels of cardiovascular risk and better physical fitness than students in public establishments. The authors suggest considering specific school interventions to mitigate cardiovascular risk and improve physical fitness among this vulnerable population. To this end, future studies should analyze the characteristics of physical activity and nutritional habits in schools to determine the factors that affect the results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal de pediatria\",\"volume\":\"100 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 660-666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal de pediatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021755724000949\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021755724000949","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要比较智利在校学生的心血管风险和体能状况:共有 7218 名学生参加,他们完成了国家教育质量测量系统的所有国家测试,其中包括体能和人体测量测试。测试结果根据教育机构类型和人体测量指标进行比较。体能通过下肢力量、腹部力量、上肢力量、躯干柔韧性、用力心率和心肺功能进行测量。分析了体重指数、心率和腰围与身高的比例,作为预测心血管风险的指标:结果:不同类型的机构在预测心血管风险方面存在差异(P < 0.05)。在所评估的体能测试中也发现了差异(P < 0.01)。与公立学校(PS)和委托管理学校(DA)相比,私立学校(PSC)和补助学校(SC)的学生心血管风险水平较低,体能水平较高:总之,与公立学校的学生相比,社会经济水平较高的教育机构的学生心血管风险较低,身体素质较好。作者建议考虑采取特定的学校干预措施,以降低心血管风险并提高这一弱势群体的体能。为此,今后的研究应分析学校体育活动和营养习惯的特点,以确定影响结果的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cardiorespiratory fitness and socioeconomic influences in Chilean schoolchildren: a cross-sectional study

Objective

To compare the cardiovascular risk and physical fitness, according to type of school in a national sample of Chilean school students.

Methods

A total of 7,218 students participated, who completed all the national tests of the National System for Measuring the Quality of Education, which included physical fitness and anthropometric tests. The results were compared according to the type of educational establishment and anthropometric indicators were considered. Physical fitness was measured by lower extremity strength, abdominal strength, upper extremity strength, trunk flexibility, exertional heart rate, and cardiorespiratory fitness. Body mass index, heart rate, and waist-to-height ratio were analyzed as predictors of cardiovascular risk.

Results

There were differences according to the type of establishment in the predictors of cardiovascular risk (p < 0.05). Differences were also found in the physical fitness tests evaluated (p < 0.01). Students in private schools (PSC) and subsidized schools (SC) had lower levels of cardiovascular risk and higher levels of physical fitness than public schools (PS) and schools with delegated administration (DA).

Conclusions

In conclusion, students in educational establishments with a higher socioeconomic level have lower levels of cardiovascular risk and better physical fitness than students in public establishments. The authors suggest considering specific school interventions to mitigate cardiovascular risk and improve physical fitness among this vulnerable population. To this end, future studies should analyze the characteristics of physical activity and nutritional habits in schools to determine the factors that affect the results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal de pediatria
Jornal de pediatria 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Jornal de Pediatria is a bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics (Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria, SBP). It has been published without interruption since 1934. Jornal de Pediatria publishes original articles and review articles covering various areas in the field of pediatrics. By publishing relevant scientific contributions, Jornal de Pediatria aims at improving the standards of pediatrics and of the healthcare provided for children and adolescents in general, as well to foster debate about health.
期刊最新文献
Microplastics: the hidden danger. Spinal muscular atrophy in Brazil: from individual treatment to global management. Factors associated with the dietary patterns of Brazilian adolescents: analysis of the national survey of school health. An analysis of the remission phase in type 1 diabetes within a multiethnic Brazilian sample. Cultural barriers and facilitators of the parents for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination uptake by their daughters: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1