日本儿童、青少年和青年癌症(CAYA)幸存者对后续癌症一级预防的态度:CAYA 癌症后妇女长期健康综合问卷调查结果。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e29
Mikiko Asai-Sato, Toshifumi Takahashi, Kuniaki Ota, Hiromi Komiya, Takeshi Iwasa, Soichi Ogishima, Nao Suzuki
{"title":"日本儿童、青少年和青年癌症(CAYA)幸存者对后续癌症一级预防的态度:CAYA 癌症后妇女长期健康综合问卷调查结果。","authors":"Mikiko Asai-Sato, Toshifumi Takahashi, Kuniaki Ota, Hiromi Komiya, Takeshi Iwasa, Soichi Ogishima, Nao Suzuki","doi":"10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prevention of subsequent primary cancer (SPC) is crucial for cancer survivors, particularly those who developed the disease during childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood (CAYA). The aim of this study was to assess the current status of SPC prevention among female CAYA cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey regarding long-term health issues after cancer treatment was conducted using questionnaires that targeted women aged ≥20 years who had developed cancer before the age of 40 years. The survey assessed various health issues, and this paper focuses on the items related to the respondents' perceptions and attitudes toward SPC prevention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,026 respondents were analyzed. Over 60% of respondents were aware of SPC and the need for screening. The percentages of respondents who underwent regular SPC screening were 68.3%, 68.4%, 49.7%, 58.6%, and 57.0% for cervical, breast, lung, and gastric cancers, respectively. After adjusting for age, type of first cancer, and current follow-up, we found that receiving recommendations for SPC screening was the most critical factor in SPC screening uptake (odds ratio=3.836; 95% confidence interval=2.281-6.451; p<0.001 by logistic regression analysis). However, only 40.4% of the respondents received recommendations for SPC screening from their physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite good awareness of SPC prevention, the uptake rate for cancer screening among cancer survivors was inadequate, indicating that preventive measures for SPC should be promoted. Because recommendations from others strongly influence SPC screening uptake, healthcare professionals should have accurate knowledge and provide guidance regarding SPC prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":15868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes toward subsequent primary cancer prevention among survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancer in Japan: results of a comprehensive questionnaire survey on long-term women's health after CAYA cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Mikiko Asai-Sato, Toshifumi Takahashi, Kuniaki Ota, Hiromi Komiya, Takeshi Iwasa, Soichi Ogishima, Nao Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prevention of subsequent primary cancer (SPC) is crucial for cancer survivors, particularly those who developed the disease during childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood (CAYA). The aim of this study was to assess the current status of SPC prevention among female CAYA cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey regarding long-term health issues after cancer treatment was conducted using questionnaires that targeted women aged ≥20 years who had developed cancer before the age of 40 years. The survey assessed various health issues, and this paper focuses on the items related to the respondents' perceptions and attitudes toward SPC prevention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,026 respondents were analyzed. Over 60% of respondents were aware of SPC and the need for screening. The percentages of respondents who underwent regular SPC screening were 68.3%, 68.4%, 49.7%, 58.6%, and 57.0% for cervical, breast, lung, and gastric cancers, respectively. After adjusting for age, type of first cancer, and current follow-up, we found that receiving recommendations for SPC screening was the most critical factor in SPC screening uptake (odds ratio=3.836; 95% confidence interval=2.281-6.451; p<0.001 by logistic regression analysis). However, only 40.4% of the respondents received recommendations for SPC screening from their physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite good awareness of SPC prevention, the uptake rate for cancer screening among cancer survivors was inadequate, indicating that preventive measures for SPC should be promoted. Because recommendations from others strongly influence SPC screening uptake, healthcare professionals should have accurate knowledge and provide guidance regarding SPC prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e29\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e29","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:预防继发性原发性癌症(SPC)对癌症幸存者至关重要,尤其是那些在童年、青春期和青年期(CAYA)发病的癌症幸存者。本研究旨在评估女性 CAYA 癌症幸存者预防 SPC 的现状:方法:针对 40 岁以前罹患癌症且年龄≥20 岁的女性,通过问卷调查的方式,对她们在癌症治疗后的长期健康问题进行了调查。调查对各种健康问题进行了评估,本文重点讨论与受访者对预防 SPC 的看法和态度有关的项目:结果:共对 1,026 名受访者进行了分析。超过 60% 的受访者了解 SPC 和筛查的必要性。在宫颈癌、乳腺癌、肺癌和胃癌方面,定期接受 SPC 筛查的受访者比例分别为 68.3%、68.4%、49.7%、58.6% 和 57.0%。在对年龄、首次患癌类型和当前随访情况进行调整后,我们发现,接受 SPC 筛查建议是 SPC 筛查接受率的最关键因素(几率比=3.836;95% 置信区间=2.281-6.451;p 结论:尽管人们对 SPC 预防有很好的认识,但对 SPC 筛查的接受率并不高:尽管癌症幸存者对 SPC 预防有较好的认识,但他们接受癌症筛查的比例并不高,这表明应推广 SPC 预防措施。由于其他人的建议对 SPC 筛查的接受率有很大影响,因此医疗保健专业人员应准确了解并指导 SPC 预防工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attitudes toward subsequent primary cancer prevention among survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancer in Japan: results of a comprehensive questionnaire survey on long-term women's health after CAYA cancer.

Objective: Prevention of subsequent primary cancer (SPC) is crucial for cancer survivors, particularly those who developed the disease during childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood (CAYA). The aim of this study was to assess the current status of SPC prevention among female CAYA cancer survivors.

Methods: A survey regarding long-term health issues after cancer treatment was conducted using questionnaires that targeted women aged ≥20 years who had developed cancer before the age of 40 years. The survey assessed various health issues, and this paper focuses on the items related to the respondents' perceptions and attitudes toward SPC prevention.

Results: A total of 1,026 respondents were analyzed. Over 60% of respondents were aware of SPC and the need for screening. The percentages of respondents who underwent regular SPC screening were 68.3%, 68.4%, 49.7%, 58.6%, and 57.0% for cervical, breast, lung, and gastric cancers, respectively. After adjusting for age, type of first cancer, and current follow-up, we found that receiving recommendations for SPC screening was the most critical factor in SPC screening uptake (odds ratio=3.836; 95% confidence interval=2.281-6.451; p<0.001 by logistic regression analysis). However, only 40.4% of the respondents received recommendations for SPC screening from their physicians.

Conclusion: Despite good awareness of SPC prevention, the uptake rate for cancer screening among cancer survivors was inadequate, indicating that preventive measures for SPC should be promoted. Because recommendations from others strongly influence SPC screening uptake, healthcare professionals should have accurate knowledge and provide guidance regarding SPC prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (JGO) is an official publication of the Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Abbreviated title is ''J Gynecol Oncol''. It was launched in 1990. The JGO''s aim is to publish the highest quality manuscripts dedicated to the advancement of care of the patients with gynecologic cancer. It is an international peer-reviewed periodical journal that is published bimonthly (January, March, May, July, September, and November). Supplement numbers are at times published. The journal publishes editorials, original and review articles, correspondence, book review, etc.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of clinical usefulness of HPV-16 and HPV-18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening. Influence of cancer in pregnancy on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: an observational retrospective cohort study. Chemotherapy response score no longer predicts survival outcomes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients with BRCA mutation and/or maintenance therapy. The prognostic significance of primary tumor site in vulvar cancer: a population-based cohort study. Genetic analysis of cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1