用 CONECT-6 病例查找工具识别有复杂需求的患者:促进理解的几点提示。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-08-11 DOI:10.1111/jep.14129
Émilie Angrignon-Girouard PhD, Charlotte Schwarz MA, Dana Howse PhD, Kris Aubrey MD, PhD, Mathieu Bisson MA, Maud-Christine Chouinard RN, PhD, Laura Dickinson BA, Shelley Doucet RN, PhD, Marie-France Dubois PhD, Olivier Dumont-Samson MA, Catherine Hudon MD, PhD, CFPC
{"title":"用 CONECT-6 病例查找工具识别有复杂需求的患者:促进理解的几点提示。","authors":"Émilie Angrignon-Girouard PhD,&nbsp;Charlotte Schwarz MA,&nbsp;Dana Howse PhD,&nbsp;Kris Aubrey MD, PhD,&nbsp;Mathieu Bisson MA,&nbsp;Maud-Christine Chouinard RN, PhD,&nbsp;Laura Dickinson BA,&nbsp;Shelley Doucet RN, PhD,&nbsp;Marie-France Dubois PhD,&nbsp;Olivier Dumont-Samson MA,&nbsp;Catherine Hudon MD, PhD, CFPC","doi":"10.1111/jep.14129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Patients with complex health and social care needs (hereafter “complex needs”) often use services provided by different professionals, calling for integrated care to adequately meet their needs.<span><sup>1</sup></span> In a previous publication,<span><sup>2</sup></span> our team presented the COmplex NEeds Case-finding Tool—6 (CONECT-6), a case-finding tool including six yes or no questions, for early identification of people with complex needs who frequently use emergency department services. Even with the most robust psychometric properties, health assessment questionnaires often pose challenges for vulnerable populations, such as a lack of clarity or a lack of specificity to capture the respondents' unique and complex situations.<span><sup>3-6</sup></span> It is good practice to provide respondents with some advice and guidelines to facilitate the questionnaires' administration and promote their understanding.<span><sup>6</sup></span> This article aims to propose a few tips to ensure better understanding when administering CONECT-6 to people who frequently use emergency department services to identify if they have complex needs.</p><p>As with many other validated questionnaires, many people raised questions regarding CONECT-6 despite its simple formula and previous validation.<span><sup>6</sup></span> The most frequent challenges encountered across sites were: (1) for the first, third, and sixth items, people tended to elaborate on their specific situation, leaving the research team to either choose a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ option or to rephrase the question to elicit a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ response; and (2) the second and fifth items sometimes needed more explanation.</p><p>The research team, including patient partners, met and shared strategies they used to facilitate respondents' understanding and proposed tips. English-speaking members of the team worked on the English version while French-speaking members worked on the French version. Teamwork and discussions ensured that the questionnaires maintained their original meaning. Here are the proposed tips to administer the CONECT-6 tool in Tables 1 and 2.</p><p>This paper proposes tips to promote participant understanding when completing the CONECT-6 questionnaire. This 6-item questionnaire remains a useful case-finding tool to identify people with complex health and social needs in the emergency department for recruitment in research projects or in clinical programs.</p><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The CONECT-6 case-finding tool to identify patients with complex needs: A few tips to promote understanding\",\"authors\":\"Émilie Angrignon-Girouard PhD,&nbsp;Charlotte Schwarz MA,&nbsp;Dana Howse PhD,&nbsp;Kris Aubrey MD, PhD,&nbsp;Mathieu Bisson MA,&nbsp;Maud-Christine Chouinard RN, PhD,&nbsp;Laura Dickinson BA,&nbsp;Shelley Doucet RN, PhD,&nbsp;Marie-France Dubois PhD,&nbsp;Olivier Dumont-Samson MA,&nbsp;Catherine Hudon MD, PhD, CFPC\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.14129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Patients with complex health and social care needs (hereafter “complex needs”) often use services provided by different professionals, calling for integrated care to adequately meet their needs.<span><sup>1</sup></span> In a previous publication,<span><sup>2</sup></span> our team presented the COmplex NEeds Case-finding Tool—6 (CONECT-6), a case-finding tool including six yes or no questions, for early identification of people with complex needs who frequently use emergency department services. Even with the most robust psychometric properties, health assessment questionnaires often pose challenges for vulnerable populations, such as a lack of clarity or a lack of specificity to capture the respondents' unique and complex situations.<span><sup>3-6</sup></span> It is good practice to provide respondents with some advice and guidelines to facilitate the questionnaires' administration and promote their understanding.<span><sup>6</sup></span> This article aims to propose a few tips to ensure better understanding when administering CONECT-6 to people who frequently use emergency department services to identify if they have complex needs.</p><p>As with many other validated questionnaires, many people raised questions regarding CONECT-6 despite its simple formula and previous validation.<span><sup>6</sup></span> The most frequent challenges encountered across sites were: (1) for the first, third, and sixth items, people tended to elaborate on their specific situation, leaving the research team to either choose a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ option or to rephrase the question to elicit a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ response; and (2) the second and fifth items sometimes needed more explanation.</p><p>The research team, including patient partners, met and shared strategies they used to facilitate respondents' understanding and proposed tips. English-speaking members of the team worked on the English version while French-speaking members worked on the French version. Teamwork and discussions ensured that the questionnaires maintained their original meaning. Here are the proposed tips to administer the CONECT-6 tool in Tables 1 and 2.</p><p>This paper proposes tips to promote participant understanding when completing the CONECT-6 questionnaire. This 6-item questionnaire remains a useful case-finding tool to identify people with complex health and social needs in the emergency department for recruitment in research projects or in clinical programs.</p><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771697/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14129\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

具有复杂健康和社会护理需求(以下简称“复杂需求”)的患者通常使用不同专业人员提供的服务,要求综合护理以充分满足其需求在之前的出版物中,我们的团队介绍了复杂需求病例发现工具-6 (connect -6),这是一个病例发现工具,包括六个是或否问题,用于早期识别经常使用急诊部门服务的有复杂需求的人。即使具有最强大的心理测量特性,健康评估问卷也经常对弱势群体构成挑战,例如缺乏清晰度或缺乏特异性来捕捉受访者独特和复杂的情况。3-6向受访者提供一些建议和指导,以方便问卷的管理和促进他们的理解,这是一种很好的做法本文旨在提出一些建议,以确保在对经常使用急诊部门服务的人进行connect -6管理时更好地理解他们是否有复杂的需求。与许多其他经过验证的问卷一样,尽管connect -6的公式很简单,而且已经经过验证,但还是有很多人对它提出了疑问在所有网站上遇到的最常见的挑战是:(1)对于第一项、第三项和第六项,人们倾向于详细说明他们的具体情况,让研究团队要么选择“是”或“否”选项,要么重新表达问题以引出“是”或“否”的回答;(2)第二和第五项有时需要更多的解释。包括患者合作伙伴在内的研究小组会面并分享了他们用来促进受访者理解和提出建议的策略。说英语的团队成员负责英文版,说法语的团队成员负责法文版。团队合作和讨论确保问卷保持原来的意思。表1和表2中列出了管理connect -6工具的建议技巧。本文提出了在完成connect -6问卷时促进参与者理解的提示。这个包含6个项目的问卷仍然是一个有用的病例查找工具,可以在急诊科招募研究项目或临床项目时识别出有复杂健康和社会需求的人。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The CONECT-6 case-finding tool to identify patients with complex needs: A few tips to promote understanding

Patients with complex health and social care needs (hereafter “complex needs”) often use services provided by different professionals, calling for integrated care to adequately meet their needs.1 In a previous publication,2 our team presented the COmplex NEeds Case-finding Tool—6 (CONECT-6), a case-finding tool including six yes or no questions, for early identification of people with complex needs who frequently use emergency department services. Even with the most robust psychometric properties, health assessment questionnaires often pose challenges for vulnerable populations, such as a lack of clarity or a lack of specificity to capture the respondents' unique and complex situations.3-6 It is good practice to provide respondents with some advice and guidelines to facilitate the questionnaires' administration and promote their understanding.6 This article aims to propose a few tips to ensure better understanding when administering CONECT-6 to people who frequently use emergency department services to identify if they have complex needs.

As with many other validated questionnaires, many people raised questions regarding CONECT-6 despite its simple formula and previous validation.6 The most frequent challenges encountered across sites were: (1) for the first, third, and sixth items, people tended to elaborate on their specific situation, leaving the research team to either choose a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ option or to rephrase the question to elicit a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ response; and (2) the second and fifth items sometimes needed more explanation.

The research team, including patient partners, met and shared strategies they used to facilitate respondents' understanding and proposed tips. English-speaking members of the team worked on the English version while French-speaking members worked on the French version. Teamwork and discussions ensured that the questionnaires maintained their original meaning. Here are the proposed tips to administer the CONECT-6 tool in Tables 1 and 2.

This paper proposes tips to promote participant understanding when completing the CONECT-6 questionnaire. This 6-item questionnaire remains a useful case-finding tool to identify people with complex health and social needs in the emergency department for recruitment in research projects or in clinical programs.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Verbal Feedback in Medical Education: Utilization of a Feedback Model to Develop a Standardized Rubric for Evaluation. Determining Awareness of Age-Related Changes in Individuals Aged 40 and Over Applying to Family Health Centres in Türkiye. Beyond Anxiety: Rethinking the Psychological Drivers of Nurses' Readiness for Medical Artificial Intelligence. Navigating Marital Dynamics in Pakistan: The Interplay of Interpersonal Patterns and Sociocultural Influences. Only Economic Solutions Will Enable the Implementation of Genetic Sequencing in the Real World.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1