在骨折手术后使用底特律介入疼痛管理工具评估术后疼痛管理:我们到底做得怎么样?

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000002891
Lauryn J Boggs, Sasha A Stine, Eunice Heuvers, Hunter L Ross, Rahul Vaidya
{"title":"在骨折手术后使用底特律介入疼痛管理工具评估术后疼痛管理:我们到底做得怎么样?","authors":"Lauryn J Boggs, Sasha A Stine, Eunice Heuvers, Hunter L Ross, Rahul Vaidya","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess patients' opioid prescription usage and pain management satisfaction after fracture surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design : An IRB-approved prospective prognostic cohort study for postoperative fracture patients was conducted. Patients were evaluated by an independent observer at two weeks, six weeks, three months, and six months postoperatively where they were given Detroit Interventional Pain Assessment (DIPA) questionnaires regarding their postoperative pain and opioid usage. Opioid prescriptions were verified by Michigan Automated Prescription System. All patients were divided into major fractures (tibia, femur, acetabulum, pelvis, calcaneus, talus, and polytrauma) and minor fractures (scapula, clavicle, humerus, radius, ulna, scaphoid, carpal/metacarpal, patella, fibula, ankle, and metarsal) and were followed for two years.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-Center Level One Trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients presenting to clinic over a six month period were invited to participate in this study. Patients who did not consent were excluded.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Outcome measures were the amount of prescribed opioids in daily Milligram Morphine equivalents (MMEs), opioid usage, DIPA pain scores, pain management efficiency (percentage of patients reporting no pain or tolerable pain with their regimen). Prescribed MMEs, pain management efficiency scores, and the percentage of patients using opioids were compared across all postoperative periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 201 fracture patients, the average age was 47.8 ± 16.3 SD (18-87 years) and there were 116 males (57.8%) and 85 females (42.2%). The percentage of patients using opioids and their daily prescribed MMEs significantly decreased from two weeks (48.2%, 21.6 MMEs) to six months (10.3%, 8.13 MMEs) (P < 0.001). Fifty-one percent of patients were off opioids at two weeks, 64.5% at six weeks, 84.2% at three months, and 89.7% at six months. All opioid prescriptions at six months and two years were prescribed to polytrauma patients who underwent sequential surgeries and these prescriptions originated from outside prescribers. Pain management efficiency scores were worst at two weeks (67.2%) but improved at three months (82.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As patients transitioned further from their surgical date, there was a decrease in opioid prescriptions and patient reported opioid usage. Despite the opioid tapering practices by surgeons, polytrauma patients still received prescriptions from outside prescribers for orthopaedic aftercare after three months, signaling the necessity for patients to see outside prescribers for their pain management after this time.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Postoperative Pain Management using the Detroit Interventional Pain Management tool after fracture surgery: How well are we really doing?\",\"authors\":\"Lauryn J Boggs, Sasha A Stine, Eunice Heuvers, Hunter L Ross, Rahul Vaidya\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess patients' opioid prescription usage and pain management satisfaction after fracture surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design : An IRB-approved prospective prognostic cohort study for postoperative fracture patients was conducted. Patients were evaluated by an independent observer at two weeks, six weeks, three months, and six months postoperatively where they were given Detroit Interventional Pain Assessment (DIPA) questionnaires regarding their postoperative pain and opioid usage. Opioid prescriptions were verified by Michigan Automated Prescription System. All patients were divided into major fractures (tibia, femur, acetabulum, pelvis, calcaneus, talus, and polytrauma) and minor fractures (scapula, clavicle, humerus, radius, ulna, scaphoid, carpal/metacarpal, patella, fibula, ankle, and metarsal) and were followed for two years.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-Center Level One Trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients presenting to clinic over a six month period were invited to participate in this study. Patients who did not consent were excluded.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Outcome measures were the amount of prescribed opioids in daily Milligram Morphine equivalents (MMEs), opioid usage, DIPA pain scores, pain management efficiency (percentage of patients reporting no pain or tolerable pain with their regimen). Prescribed MMEs, pain management efficiency scores, and the percentage of patients using opioids were compared across all postoperative periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 201 fracture patients, the average age was 47.8 ± 16.3 SD (18-87 years) and there were 116 males (57.8%) and 85 females (42.2%). The percentage of patients using opioids and their daily prescribed MMEs significantly decreased from two weeks (48.2%, 21.6 MMEs) to six months (10.3%, 8.13 MMEs) (P < 0.001). Fifty-one percent of patients were off opioids at two weeks, 64.5% at six weeks, 84.2% at three months, and 89.7% at six months. All opioid prescriptions at six months and two years were prescribed to polytrauma patients who underwent sequential surgeries and these prescriptions originated from outside prescribers. Pain management efficiency scores were worst at two weeks (67.2%) but improved at three months (82.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As patients transitioned further from their surgical date, there was a decrease in opioid prescriptions and patient reported opioid usage. Despite the opioid tapering practices by surgeons, polytrauma patients still received prescriptions from outside prescribers for orthopaedic aftercare after three months, signaling the necessity for patients to see outside prescribers for their pain management after this time.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002891\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002891","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估骨折手术后患者的阿片类药物处方使用情况和疼痛治疗满意度:设计:针对骨折术后患者开展了一项经 IRB 批准的前瞻性预后队列研究。由一名独立观察员分别在术后两周、六周、三个月和六个月对患者进行评估,并向他们发放底特律介入疼痛评估(DIPA)问卷,了解他们的术后疼痛和阿片类药物使用情况。阿片类药物处方由密歇根自动处方系统进行验证。所有患者被分为主要骨折(胫骨、股骨、髋臼、骨盆、小腿骨、距骨和多发性创伤)和轻微骨折(肩胛骨、锁骨、肱骨、桡骨、尺骨、肩胛骨、腕骨/掌骨、髌骨、腓骨、踝骨和跖骨),并随访两年:单中心一级创伤中心:患者选择标准:邀请在六个月内就诊的患者参与本研究。结果测量和比较:结果测量指标包括以每日毫克吗啡当量(MMEs)为单位的阿片类药物处方量、阿片类药物使用量、DIPA 疼痛评分、疼痛管理效率(报告无痛或可忍受疼痛的患者比例)。对所有术后阶段的处方 MMEs、疼痛管理效率评分和使用阿片类药物的患者比例进行了比较:201 名骨折患者的平均年龄为 47.8±16.3 SD(18-87 岁),其中男性 116 名(57.8%),女性 85 名(42.2%)。从两周(48.2%,21.6MMEs)到六个月(10.3%,8.13MMEs),使用阿片类药物的患者比例和每日处方MMEs显著下降(P < 0.001)。51%的患者在两周时停用了阿片类药物,64.5%的患者在六周时停用了阿片类药物,84.2%的患者在三个月时停用了阿片类药物,89.7%的患者在六个月时停用了阿片类药物。六个月和两年后的所有阿片类药物处方都开给了连续接受手术的多发性创伤患者,这些处方都来自外部处方医生。疼痛管理效率评分在两周时最差(67.2%),但在三个月时有所改善(82.6%):结论:随着患者手术日期的推移,阿片类药物处方和患者报告的阿片类药物使用量有所减少。尽管外科医生采取了减少阿片类药物用量的做法,但多发性创伤患者在三个月后仍从外部处方医生处获得骨科术后护理的处方,这表明患者有必要在三个月后从外部处方医生处获得疼痛治疗的处方:预后二级。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating Postoperative Pain Management using the Detroit Interventional Pain Management tool after fracture surgery: How well are we really doing?

Objectives: To assess patients' opioid prescription usage and pain management satisfaction after fracture surgery.

Methods: Design : An IRB-approved prospective prognostic cohort study for postoperative fracture patients was conducted. Patients were evaluated by an independent observer at two weeks, six weeks, three months, and six months postoperatively where they were given Detroit Interventional Pain Assessment (DIPA) questionnaires regarding their postoperative pain and opioid usage. Opioid prescriptions were verified by Michigan Automated Prescription System. All patients were divided into major fractures (tibia, femur, acetabulum, pelvis, calcaneus, talus, and polytrauma) and minor fractures (scapula, clavicle, humerus, radius, ulna, scaphoid, carpal/metacarpal, patella, fibula, ankle, and metarsal) and were followed for two years.

Setting: Single-Center Level One Trauma Center.

Patient selection criteria: Patients presenting to clinic over a six month period were invited to participate in this study. Patients who did not consent were excluded.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Outcome measures were the amount of prescribed opioids in daily Milligram Morphine equivalents (MMEs), opioid usage, DIPA pain scores, pain management efficiency (percentage of patients reporting no pain or tolerable pain with their regimen). Prescribed MMEs, pain management efficiency scores, and the percentage of patients using opioids were compared across all postoperative periods.

Results: For 201 fracture patients, the average age was 47.8 ± 16.3 SD (18-87 years) and there were 116 males (57.8%) and 85 females (42.2%). The percentage of patients using opioids and their daily prescribed MMEs significantly decreased from two weeks (48.2%, 21.6 MMEs) to six months (10.3%, 8.13 MMEs) (P < 0.001). Fifty-one percent of patients were off opioids at two weeks, 64.5% at six weeks, 84.2% at three months, and 89.7% at six months. All opioid prescriptions at six months and two years were prescribed to polytrauma patients who underwent sequential surgeries and these prescriptions originated from outside prescribers. Pain management efficiency scores were worst at two weeks (67.2%) but improved at three months (82.6%).

Conclusions: As patients transitioned further from their surgical date, there was a decrease in opioid prescriptions and patient reported opioid usage. Despite the opioid tapering practices by surgeons, polytrauma patients still received prescriptions from outside prescribers for orthopaedic aftercare after three months, signaling the necessity for patients to see outside prescribers for their pain management after this time.

Level of evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Outpatient Upper Extremity Fracture Surgery Is Associated with Increased Post-operative Emergency Department Visits. Lower Extremity Trauma is Associated With an Increased Rate of New Mental Disorder Diagnosis and Suicide Attempt. The Dangers of Distracted Driving: A Substudy of Patient Perception Data From the DRIVSAFE Observational Study. Heritable Thrombophilia and Increased Risk for Venous Thromboembolism Despite Thromboprophylaxis After Pelvis or Acetabulum Fracture. Timing of radiographic healing for distal femur fractures treated with intramedullary nails.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1