疟疾筛查:分子生物学的贡献是什么?

Q3 Medicine Tunisie Medicale Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.62438/tunismed.v102i8.4949
Sameh Belgacem, Mohamed Bettaieb, Najoua Houas, Saoussen Chouchène, Maha Mastouri, Hamouda Babba
{"title":"疟疾筛查:分子生物学的贡献是什么?","authors":"Sameh Belgacem, Mohamed Bettaieb, Najoua Houas, Saoussen Chouchène, Maha Mastouri, Hamouda Babba","doi":"10.62438/tunismed.v102i8.4949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>According to the World Health Organization, Microscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing malaria. However, the performance of this examination depends on the experience of the microscopist and the level of parasitemia. Thus, molecular biology detection of malaria could be an alternative technique.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>evaluate the contribution of molecular biology in detecting imported malaria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a descriptive, prospective study, including all students, from the Monastir region, and foreigners, from countries endemic to malaria. The study period was from September 2020 to April 2021. Each subject was screened for malaria by three methods: direct microscopic detection of Plasmodium, detection of plasmodial antigens, and detection of plasmodial DNA by nested PCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 127 subjects screened, only one had a positive microscopic examination for Plasmodium falciparum. Among the 126 subjects with a negative microscopic examination, twelve students had a positive nested PCR result, i.e. 9.5%. Molecular sequencing allowed the identification of ten isolates of Plasmodium falciparum, one Plasmodium malariae and one Plasmodium ovale. Our study showed that the results of nested PCR agreed with those of microscopy in 90.6% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nested PCR seems more sensitive for the detection of low parasitemias. Hence the importance of including molecular biology as a malaria screening tool to ensure better detection of imported cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":38818,"journal":{"name":"Tunisie Medicale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Malaria screening: what is the contribution of molecular biology?\",\"authors\":\"Sameh Belgacem, Mohamed Bettaieb, Najoua Houas, Saoussen Chouchène, Maha Mastouri, Hamouda Babba\",\"doi\":\"10.62438/tunismed.v102i8.4949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>According to the World Health Organization, Microscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing malaria. However, the performance of this examination depends on the experience of the microscopist and the level of parasitemia. Thus, molecular biology detection of malaria could be an alternative technique.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>evaluate the contribution of molecular biology in detecting imported malaria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a descriptive, prospective study, including all students, from the Monastir region, and foreigners, from countries endemic to malaria. The study period was from September 2020 to April 2021. Each subject was screened for malaria by three methods: direct microscopic detection of Plasmodium, detection of plasmodial antigens, and detection of plasmodial DNA by nested PCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 127 subjects screened, only one had a positive microscopic examination for Plasmodium falciparum. Among the 126 subjects with a negative microscopic examination, twelve students had a positive nested PCR result, i.e. 9.5%. Molecular sequencing allowed the identification of ten isolates of Plasmodium falciparum, one Plasmodium malariae and one Plasmodium ovale. Our study showed that the results of nested PCR agreed with those of microscopy in 90.6% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nested PCR seems more sensitive for the detection of low parasitemias. Hence the importance of including molecular biology as a malaria screening tool to ensure better detection of imported cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tunisie Medicale\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390060/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tunisie Medicale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v102i8.4949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunisie Medicale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v102i8.4949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:世界卫生组织认为,显微镜检查是诊断疟疾的黄金标准。然而,显微镜检查的效果取决于显微镜医师的经验和寄生虫血症的水平。目的:评估分子生物学在检测输入性疟疾方面的贡献:这是一项描述性、前瞻性研究,包括来自莫纳斯提尔地区的所有学生和来自疟疾流行国家的外国人。研究时间为 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 4 月。每名受试者都通过三种方法进行疟疾筛查:直接显微镜检测疟原虫、检测疟原虫抗原和通过巢式 PCR 检测疟原虫 DNA:在接受筛查的 127 名受试者中,只有一人的恶性疟原虫显微镜检查呈阳性。在显微镜检查呈阴性的 126 名受试者中,有 12 名学生的巢式 PCR 结果呈阳性,占 9.5%。通过分子测序,确定了 10 个恶性疟原虫分离株、1 个疟疾疟原虫分离株和 1 个卵形疟原虫分离株。我们的研究表明,在 90.6% 的病例中,巢式 PCR 的结果与显微镜检查的结果一致:结论:巢式 PCR 似乎对检测低寄生率更敏感。因此,将分子生物学作为疟疾筛查工具以确保更好地发现输入病例非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Malaria screening: what is the contribution of molecular biology?

Introduction: According to the World Health Organization, Microscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing malaria. However, the performance of this examination depends on the experience of the microscopist and the level of parasitemia. Thus, molecular biology detection of malaria could be an alternative technique.

Aim: evaluate the contribution of molecular biology in detecting imported malaria.

Methods: This was a descriptive, prospective study, including all students, from the Monastir region, and foreigners, from countries endemic to malaria. The study period was from September 2020 to April 2021. Each subject was screened for malaria by three methods: direct microscopic detection of Plasmodium, detection of plasmodial antigens, and detection of plasmodial DNA by nested PCR.

Results: Among the 127 subjects screened, only one had a positive microscopic examination for Plasmodium falciparum. Among the 126 subjects with a negative microscopic examination, twelve students had a positive nested PCR result, i.e. 9.5%. Molecular sequencing allowed the identification of ten isolates of Plasmodium falciparum, one Plasmodium malariae and one Plasmodium ovale. Our study showed that the results of nested PCR agreed with those of microscopy in 90.6% of cases.

Conclusion: Nested PCR seems more sensitive for the detection of low parasitemias. Hence the importance of including molecular biology as a malaria screening tool to ensure better detection of imported cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tunisie Medicale
Tunisie Medicale Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
GAIA therapeutic farm: Prospective study on multidisciplinary care efficacy. Iatrogenic risk in elderly patients. Impact of virtual reality on the perception of procedural pain in paediatric oncology. Incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intravenous Leiomyomatosis of the Uterus: An Intriguing Case Revealed through Anatomopathological Examination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1