以德国罕见病为例,在分散研究中二次使用患者数据:数据科学家对过程和经验教训的探索。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076241265219
Michele Zoch, Christian Gierschner, Anne-Katrin Andreeff, Elisa Henke, Martin Sedlmayr, Gabriele Müller, Jenny Tippmann, Helge Hebestreit, Daniela Choukair, Georg F Hoffmann, Fleur Fritz-Kebede, Nicole Toepfner, Reinhard Berner, Stephanie Biergans, Raphael Verbücheln, Jannik Schaaf, Julia Fleck, Felix Nikolaus Wirth, Josef Schepers, Fabian Prasser
{"title":"以德国罕见病为例,在分散研究中二次使用患者数据:数据科学家对过程和经验教训的探索。","authors":"Michele Zoch, Christian Gierschner, Anne-Katrin Andreeff, Elisa Henke, Martin Sedlmayr, Gabriele Müller, Jenny Tippmann, Helge Hebestreit, Daniela Choukair, Georg F Hoffmann, Fleur Fritz-Kebede, Nicole Toepfner, Reinhard Berner, Stephanie Biergans, Raphael Verbücheln, Jannik Schaaf, Julia Fleck, Felix Nikolaus Wirth, Josef Schepers, Fabian Prasser","doi":"10.1177/20552076241265219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Unlocking the potential of routine medical data for clinical research requires the analysis of data from multiple healthcare institutions. However, according to German data protection regulations, data can often not leave the individual institutions and decentralized approaches are needed. Decentralized studies face challenges regarding coordination, technical infrastructure, interoperability and regulatory compliance. Rare diseases are an important prototype research focus for decentralized data analyses, as patients are rare by definition and adequate cohort sizes can only be reached if data from multiple sites is combined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within the project \"Collaboration on Rare Diseases\", decentralized studies focusing on four rare diseases (cystic fibrosis, phenylketonuria, Kawasaki disease, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children) were conducted at 17 German university hospitals. Therefore, a data management process for decentralized studies was developed by an interdisciplinary team of experts from medicine, public health and data science. Along the process, lessons learned were formulated and discussed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The process consists of eight steps and includes sub-processes for the definition of medical use cases, script development and data management. The lessons learned include on the one hand the organization and administration of the studies (collaboration of experts, use of standardized forms and publication of project information), and on the other hand the development of scripts and analysis (dependency on the database, use of standards and open source tools, feedback loops, anonymization).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work captures central challenges and describes possible solutions and can hence serve as a solid basis for the implementation and conduction of similar decentralized studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secondary use of patient data within decentralized studies using the example of rare diseases in Germany: A data scientist's exploration of process and lessons learned.\",\"authors\":\"Michele Zoch, Christian Gierschner, Anne-Katrin Andreeff, Elisa Henke, Martin Sedlmayr, Gabriele Müller, Jenny Tippmann, Helge Hebestreit, Daniela Choukair, Georg F Hoffmann, Fleur Fritz-Kebede, Nicole Toepfner, Reinhard Berner, Stephanie Biergans, Raphael Verbücheln, Jannik Schaaf, Julia Fleck, Felix Nikolaus Wirth, Josef Schepers, Fabian Prasser\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552076241265219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Unlocking the potential of routine medical data for clinical research requires the analysis of data from multiple healthcare institutions. However, according to German data protection regulations, data can often not leave the individual institutions and decentralized approaches are needed. Decentralized studies face challenges regarding coordination, technical infrastructure, interoperability and regulatory compliance. Rare diseases are an important prototype research focus for decentralized data analyses, as patients are rare by definition and adequate cohort sizes can only be reached if data from multiple sites is combined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within the project \\\"Collaboration on Rare Diseases\\\", decentralized studies focusing on four rare diseases (cystic fibrosis, phenylketonuria, Kawasaki disease, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children) were conducted at 17 German university hospitals. Therefore, a data management process for decentralized studies was developed by an interdisciplinary team of experts from medicine, public health and data science. Along the process, lessons learned were formulated and discussed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The process consists of eight steps and includes sub-processes for the definition of medical use cases, script development and data management. The lessons learned include on the one hand the organization and administration of the studies (collaboration of experts, use of standardized forms and publication of project information), and on the other hand the development of scripts and analysis (dependency on the database, use of standards and open source tools, feedback loops, anonymization).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work captures central challenges and describes possible solutions and can hence serve as a solid basis for the implementation and conduction of similar decentralized studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11316959/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241265219\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241265219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:要挖掘常规医疗数据在临床研究中的潜力,需要对来自多个医疗机构的数据进行分析。然而,根据德国数据保护法规,数据通常不能离开单个机构,因此需要采用分散的方法。分散式研究面临着协调、技术基础设施、互操作性和监管合规方面的挑战。罕见病是分散式数据分析的一个重要研究重点原型,因为根据定义,患者是罕见的,只有将来自多个研究机构的数据结合起来,才能达到足够的队列规模:在 "罕见疾病合作 "项目中,17 家德国大学医院针对四种罕见疾病(囊性纤维化、苯丙酮尿症、川崎病、儿童多系统炎症综合征)开展了分散研究。因此,由医学、公共卫生和数据科学专家组成的跨学科团队为分散研究制定了数据管理流程。在这一过程中,我们总结并讨论了经验教训:结果:该流程由八个步骤组成,包括医疗用例定义、脚本开发和数据管理等子流程。经验教训一方面包括研究的组织和管理(专家合作、使用标准化表格和发布项目信息),另一方面包括脚本的开发和分析(对数据库的依赖、标准和开源工具的使用、反馈回路、匿名化):这项工作抓住了核心挑战并描述了可能的解决方案,因此可作为实施和开展类似分散研究的坚实基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Secondary use of patient data within decentralized studies using the example of rare diseases in Germany: A data scientist's exploration of process and lessons learned.

Objective: Unlocking the potential of routine medical data for clinical research requires the analysis of data from multiple healthcare institutions. However, according to German data protection regulations, data can often not leave the individual institutions and decentralized approaches are needed. Decentralized studies face challenges regarding coordination, technical infrastructure, interoperability and regulatory compliance. Rare diseases are an important prototype research focus for decentralized data analyses, as patients are rare by definition and adequate cohort sizes can only be reached if data from multiple sites is combined.

Methods: Within the project "Collaboration on Rare Diseases", decentralized studies focusing on four rare diseases (cystic fibrosis, phenylketonuria, Kawasaki disease, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children) were conducted at 17 German university hospitals. Therefore, a data management process for decentralized studies was developed by an interdisciplinary team of experts from medicine, public health and data science. Along the process, lessons learned were formulated and discussed.

Results: The process consists of eight steps and includes sub-processes for the definition of medical use cases, script development and data management. The lessons learned include on the one hand the organization and administration of the studies (collaboration of experts, use of standardized forms and publication of project information), and on the other hand the development of scripts and analysis (dependency on the database, use of standards and open source tools, feedback loops, anonymization).

Conclusions: This work captures central challenges and describes possible solutions and can hence serve as a solid basis for the implementation and conduction of similar decentralized studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
期刊最新文献
A feasibility study on utilizing machine learning technology to reduce the costs of gastric cancer screening in Taizhou, China. Ageing well with tech: Exploring the determinants of e-healthcare services adoption in an emerging economy. Chinese colposcopists' attitudes toward the colposcopic artificial intelligence auxiliary diagnostic system (CAIADS): A nation-wide, multi-center survey. Digital leadership: Norwegian healthcare managers' attitudes towards using digital tools. Disease characteristics influence the privacy calculus to adopt electronic health records: A survey study in Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1