评估在关节镜缝合和孤行半月板部分切除术后采用臭氧富血小板血浆疗法治疗退行性膝关节骨关节炎半月板撕裂的矫形生物学效果。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Knee Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.016
Ahmed Alkhuzai, Hisham Arif Getta, Ali Ibrahim Mohammed, Roshna S. Aziz
{"title":"评估在关节镜缝合和孤行半月板部分切除术后采用臭氧富血小板血浆疗法治疗退行性膝关节骨关节炎半月板撕裂的矫形生物学效果。","authors":"Ahmed Alkhuzai,&nbsp;Hisham Arif Getta,&nbsp;Ali Ibrahim Mohammed,&nbsp;Roshna S. Aziz","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Knee joint osteoarthritis (OA)-related meniscal tears are still sometimes treated in centers by arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM), which is then followed by a solitary physical therapy regimen.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy of intra-articular injection of ozonized platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid following arthroscopic suturing, and APM to treat meniscal tear degenerative type.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a randomized trial of prospective comparative research, 104 patients, all of whom had meniscal tears due to OA of the knee, were randomly divided into two groups. The participants in Group A (55 patients) were given intra-articular ozonized PRP and hyaluronate therapeutics, following arthroscopic suturing of meniscal tear treatment (ASMT) of degenerative knee joint OA. Group B (49 patients) was prepared for APM alone. Both groups were followed by physical therapy and a follow up visit throughout 12, 24, and 36 months. The WOMAC and Lequesne scores were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At every follow up visit for 6, 12, and 24, months, there was a significant decline in the mean of WOMAC and Lequesne scores in Groups A and B relative to baseline. Additionally, Group A significantly (<em>P</em>&lt;0.0001) outperformed Group B at 12, 24, and 36 months for both Lequesne’s and WOMAC scores. There were infection, stiffness, and widespread OA knee degeneration detected in Group B while no serious adverse effects were observed in Group A.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study’s findings demonstrated that physical and intra-articular orthobiological ozonized PRP and hyaluronate therapies were more effective than APM in treating degenerative knee joint OA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"50 ","pages":"Pages 69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001145/pdfft?md5=1ee46721c1c0811559a2ab3a320df5b4&pid=1-s2.0-S0968016024001145-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of orthobiological ozonized platelet-rich plasma therapy post-arthroscopic suturing and lone partial meniscectomy in the treatment of meniscal tears within degenerative knee osteoarthritis\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Alkhuzai,&nbsp;Hisham Arif Getta,&nbsp;Ali Ibrahim Mohammed,&nbsp;Roshna S. Aziz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Knee joint osteoarthritis (OA)-related meniscal tears are still sometimes treated in centers by arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM), which is then followed by a solitary physical therapy regimen.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy of intra-articular injection of ozonized platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid following arthroscopic suturing, and APM to treat meniscal tear degenerative type.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a randomized trial of prospective comparative research, 104 patients, all of whom had meniscal tears due to OA of the knee, were randomly divided into two groups. The participants in Group A (55 patients) were given intra-articular ozonized PRP and hyaluronate therapeutics, following arthroscopic suturing of meniscal tear treatment (ASMT) of degenerative knee joint OA. Group B (49 patients) was prepared for APM alone. Both groups were followed by physical therapy and a follow up visit throughout 12, 24, and 36 months. The WOMAC and Lequesne scores were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At every follow up visit for 6, 12, and 24, months, there was a significant decline in the mean of WOMAC and Lequesne scores in Groups A and B relative to baseline. Additionally, Group A significantly (<em>P</em>&lt;0.0001) outperformed Group B at 12, 24, and 36 months for both Lequesne’s and WOMAC scores. There were infection, stiffness, and widespread OA knee degeneration detected in Group B while no serious adverse effects were observed in Group A.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study’s findings demonstrated that physical and intra-articular orthobiological ozonized PRP and hyaluronate therapies were more effective than APM in treating degenerative knee joint OA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 69-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001145/pdfft?md5=1ee46721c1c0811559a2ab3a320df5b4&pid=1-s2.0-S0968016024001145-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001145\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:膝关节骨关节炎(OA)相关半月板撕裂有时仍在中心接受关节镜下半月板部分切除术(APM)治疗,然后进行单独的物理治疗:本研究旨在比较关节镜下缝合后关节内注射臭氧富血小板血浆(PRP)和透明质酸与半月板部分切除术治疗退行性半月板撕裂的疗效:在一项前瞻性比较研究的随机试验中,104 名患者被随机分为两组,他们都因膝关节 OA 而导致半月板撕裂。A 组(55 名患者)在对退行性膝关节 OA 进行关节镜下半月板撕裂缝合治疗(ASMT)后,给予关节内臭氧化 PRP 和透明质酸盐治疗。B 组(49 名患者)只准备接受 APM 治疗。两组患者均接受物理治疗,并在 12、24 和 36 个月内进行随访。结果:在 6 个月、12 个月和 24 个月的每次随访中,A 组和 B 组的 WOMAC 和 Lequesne 平均得分与基线相比均有显著下降。此外,A 组明显优于 B 组:研究结果表明,在治疗退行性膝关节 OA 方面,物理疗法和关节内臭氧生物矫形疗法以及透明质酸盐疗法比 APM 更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of orthobiological ozonized platelet-rich plasma therapy post-arthroscopic suturing and lone partial meniscectomy in the treatment of meniscal tears within degenerative knee osteoarthritis

Background

Knee joint osteoarthritis (OA)-related meniscal tears are still sometimes treated in centers by arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM), which is then followed by a solitary physical therapy regimen.

Objective

The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy of intra-articular injection of ozonized platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid following arthroscopic suturing, and APM to treat meniscal tear degenerative type.

Methods

In a randomized trial of prospective comparative research, 104 patients, all of whom had meniscal tears due to OA of the knee, were randomly divided into two groups. The participants in Group A (55 patients) were given intra-articular ozonized PRP and hyaluronate therapeutics, following arthroscopic suturing of meniscal tear treatment (ASMT) of degenerative knee joint OA. Group B (49 patients) was prepared for APM alone. Both groups were followed by physical therapy and a follow up visit throughout 12, 24, and 36 months. The WOMAC and Lequesne scores were evaluated.

Results

At every follow up visit for 6, 12, and 24, months, there was a significant decline in the mean of WOMAC and Lequesne scores in Groups A and B relative to baseline. Additionally, Group A significantly (P<0.0001) outperformed Group B at 12, 24, and 36 months for both Lequesne’s and WOMAC scores. There were infection, stiffness, and widespread OA knee degeneration detected in Group B while no serious adverse effects were observed in Group A.

Conclusion

The study’s findings demonstrated that physical and intra-articular orthobiological ozonized PRP and hyaluronate therapies were more effective than APM in treating degenerative knee joint OA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Knee
Knee 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee. The topics covered include, but are not limited to: • Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry; • Biomechanical studies; • Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices; • Imaging and diagnostic techniques; • Pathology; • Trauma; • Surgery; • Rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
SPECT-CT may aid in determining which side of a revision stemmed implant problematic total knee replacement is loose when planning revision surgery The third gap – The forgotten space in total knee arthroplasty Biomechanical differences of Asian knee osteoarthritis patients during standing and walking using statistical parametric mapping: A cross-sectional study Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs influence cartilage healing Patellar tendon–Hoffa fat pad interface: From anatomy to high-resolution ultrasound imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1