D. Alvarez-Sierra, M. Martinez-Gallo, A. Sanchez-Montalva, M. A. Fernandez-Sanmartin, R. Colobran, J. Espinosa-Pereiro, E. Poyatos-Canton, A. Sanchez-Pla, C. Zurera-Egea, C. Violan, R. Parra, H. Halzayat, A. Vivancos, F. Morandeira-Rego, B. Urban-Vargas, E. Martinez-Caceres, M. Hernandez-Gonzalez, J. Bas-Minguet, A. Teniente-Serra, P. Katsikis, R. Pujol Borrell
{"title":"对 SARS-CoV-2 的适应性免疫反应是一种易受免疫印记影响的回忆性反应","authors":"D. Alvarez-Sierra, M. Martinez-Gallo, A. Sanchez-Montalva, M. A. Fernandez-Sanmartin, R. Colobran, J. Espinosa-Pereiro, E. Poyatos-Canton, A. Sanchez-Pla, C. Zurera-Egea, C. Violan, R. Parra, H. Halzayat, A. Vivancos, F. Morandeira-Rego, B. Urban-Vargas, E. Martinez-Caceres, M. Hernandez-Gonzalez, J. Bas-Minguet, A. Teniente-Serra, P. Katsikis, R. Pujol Borrell","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.11.24311358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One possible determinant of COVID-19 severity is immune imprinting (IP) by Common Cold Coronavirus (CCCV). As IP occurs only in recall immune responses, we investigated the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of unvaccinated individual to determine whether their immune response aligned with the primary or recall immune response patterns. Analysis of the Ig isotype response trajectories to the Mpro, NP, and S structural proteins and the S RBD in this group of 191 patients and 44 controls revealed a pattern of recall response in 94.2 % of cases. The levels of antibodies correlated positively with the severity of the condition rather than a milder course. High-resolution flow cytometry of fresh PBMNCs showed trajectories of plasmablasts, B cell subsets, and cTfh, suggesting a recall response. The transcriptomic profile demonstrated that this group was directly comparable to other contemporary cohorts. Overall, these findings support the idea that the response to SARS-CoV-2 is, in most cases, a recall response, likely due to B and T memory cells to CCCV, and therefore susceptible to immune imprinting and antibody-dependent enhancement.","PeriodicalId":18505,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":"2 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The adaptive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 as a recall response susceptible to immune imprinting\",\"authors\":\"D. Alvarez-Sierra, M. Martinez-Gallo, A. Sanchez-Montalva, M. A. Fernandez-Sanmartin, R. Colobran, J. Espinosa-Pereiro, E. Poyatos-Canton, A. Sanchez-Pla, C. Zurera-Egea, C. Violan, R. Parra, H. Halzayat, A. Vivancos, F. Morandeira-Rego, B. Urban-Vargas, E. Martinez-Caceres, M. Hernandez-Gonzalez, J. Bas-Minguet, A. Teniente-Serra, P. Katsikis, R. Pujol Borrell\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.08.11.24311358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One possible determinant of COVID-19 severity is immune imprinting (IP) by Common Cold Coronavirus (CCCV). As IP occurs only in recall immune responses, we investigated the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of unvaccinated individual to determine whether their immune response aligned with the primary or recall immune response patterns. Analysis of the Ig isotype response trajectories to the Mpro, NP, and S structural proteins and the S RBD in this group of 191 patients and 44 controls revealed a pattern of recall response in 94.2 % of cases. The levels of antibodies correlated positively with the severity of the condition rather than a milder course. High-resolution flow cytometry of fresh PBMNCs showed trajectories of plasmablasts, B cell subsets, and cTfh, suggesting a recall response. The transcriptomic profile demonstrated that this group was directly comparable to other contemporary cohorts. Overall, these findings support the idea that the response to SARS-CoV-2 is, in most cases, a recall response, likely due to B and T memory cells to CCCV, and therefore susceptible to immune imprinting and antibody-dependent enhancement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv\",\"volume\":\"2 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.11.24311358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.11.24311358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
COVID-19严重程度的一个可能决定因素是普通感冒冠状病毒(CCCV)的免疫印记(IP)。由于 IP 只发生在召回免疫反应中,我们调查了一组未接种疫苗的个体对 SARS-CoV-2 的免疫反应,以确定他们的免疫反应是否与原发性或召回免疫反应模式一致。通过分析这组 191 名患者和 44 名对照者对 Mpro、NP 和 S 结构蛋白以及 S RBD 的 Ig 同型反应轨迹,发现 94.2% 的病例具有回忆反应模式。抗体水平与病情严重程度呈正相关,而不是病情较轻。新鲜 PBMNCs 的高分辨率流式细胞术显示了浆细胞、B 细胞亚群和 cTfh 的轨迹,表明存在回忆反应。转录组学特征显示,该组患者与其他当代组群患者具有直接可比性。总之,这些研究结果支持这样一种观点,即对 SARS-CoV-2 的反应在大多数情况下是一种回忆性反应,可能是由于 B 和 T 记忆细胞对 CCCV 的记忆,因此容易受到免疫印记和抗体依赖性增强的影响。
The adaptive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 as a recall response susceptible to immune imprinting
One possible determinant of COVID-19 severity is immune imprinting (IP) by Common Cold Coronavirus (CCCV). As IP occurs only in recall immune responses, we investigated the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of unvaccinated individual to determine whether their immune response aligned with the primary or recall immune response patterns. Analysis of the Ig isotype response trajectories to the Mpro, NP, and S structural proteins and the S RBD in this group of 191 patients and 44 controls revealed a pattern of recall response in 94.2 % of cases. The levels of antibodies correlated positively with the severity of the condition rather than a milder course. High-resolution flow cytometry of fresh PBMNCs showed trajectories of plasmablasts, B cell subsets, and cTfh, suggesting a recall response. The transcriptomic profile demonstrated that this group was directly comparable to other contemporary cohorts. Overall, these findings support the idea that the response to SARS-CoV-2 is, in most cases, a recall response, likely due to B and T memory cells to CCCV, and therefore susceptible to immune imprinting and antibody-dependent enhancement.