砖墙和石墙比较研究

D. S. Thanki, G. D. Gohil
{"title":"砖墙和石墙比较研究","authors":"D. S. Thanki, G. D. Gohil","doi":"10.55041/ijsrem37004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the comparative analysis between brick walls and stone walls, focusing on their historical development, construction techniques, structural arrangements, aesthetics, environmental impacts, and economic considerations. The utilization of bricks as a construction material can be traced back to 7000 B.C. in Mesopotamia, with notable progressions occurring circa 2500 B.C. following the innovation of kiln firing, resulting in more robust and long-lasting bricks. Throughout history, bricks have been utilized in significant architectural endeavors such as the Great Wall of China and Roman aqueducts, with the Industrial Revolution further enhancing their cost-effectiveness and manufacturing efficiency. Conversely, stone walls are renowned for their endurance, visual attractiveness, and historical importance. Although brick walls are favored for their cost-effectiveness and ease of construction, stone walls are chosen for their durability and aesthetic appeal. Furthermore, the study highlights the environmental concerns associated with brick manufacturing, specifically the emissions from kiln firing and transportation. By scrutinizing these facets, the paper aims to offer a comprehensive insight to assist in decision-making concerning the selection of suitable materials for construction undertakings. Both materials possess distinct advantages and drawbacks, rendering them suitable for specific circumstances and purposes. Key Words: brick, stone, concrete block, load bearing capacity","PeriodicalId":13661,"journal":{"name":"INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Brick Walls and Stone Walls\",\"authors\":\"D. S. Thanki, G. D. Gohil\",\"doi\":\"10.55041/ijsrem37004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the comparative analysis between brick walls and stone walls, focusing on their historical development, construction techniques, structural arrangements, aesthetics, environmental impacts, and economic considerations. The utilization of bricks as a construction material can be traced back to 7000 B.C. in Mesopotamia, with notable progressions occurring circa 2500 B.C. following the innovation of kiln firing, resulting in more robust and long-lasting bricks. Throughout history, bricks have been utilized in significant architectural endeavors such as the Great Wall of China and Roman aqueducts, with the Industrial Revolution further enhancing their cost-effectiveness and manufacturing efficiency. Conversely, stone walls are renowned for their endurance, visual attractiveness, and historical importance. Although brick walls are favored for their cost-effectiveness and ease of construction, stone walls are chosen for their durability and aesthetic appeal. Furthermore, the study highlights the environmental concerns associated with brick manufacturing, specifically the emissions from kiln firing and transportation. By scrutinizing these facets, the paper aims to offer a comprehensive insight to assist in decision-making concerning the selection of suitable materials for construction undertakings. Both materials possess distinct advantages and drawbacks, rendering them suitable for specific circumstances and purposes. Key Words: brick, stone, concrete block, load bearing capacity\",\"PeriodicalId\":13661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem37004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem37004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对砖墙和石墙进行了比较分析,重点关注它们的历史发展、施工技术、结构安排、美学、环境影响和经济因素。砖作为建筑材料的使用可以追溯到公元前 7000 年的美索不达米亚,大约在公元前 2500 年,随着窑炉烧制技术的创新,砖的使用有了显著的进步,从而更加坚固耐用。纵观历史,砖块一直被用于重要的建筑工程,如中国长城和罗马水渠,工业革命进一步提高了砖块的成本效益和制造效率。相反,石墙因其耐久性、视觉吸引力和历史重要性而闻名于世。虽然砖墙因其成本效益高和易于建造而受到青睐,但石墙则因其耐久性和美观性而被选用。此外,研究还强调了与砖块生产相关的环境问题,特别是窑炉烧制和运输过程中的废气排放。通过对这些方面的仔细研究,本文旨在提供全面的见解,帮助人们在选择合适的建筑材料时做出决策。这两种材料都有明显的优点和缺点,因此适合特定的环境和目的。关键字:砖、石材、混凝土块、承重能力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Study of Brick Walls and Stone Walls
This study investigates the comparative analysis between brick walls and stone walls, focusing on their historical development, construction techniques, structural arrangements, aesthetics, environmental impacts, and economic considerations. The utilization of bricks as a construction material can be traced back to 7000 B.C. in Mesopotamia, with notable progressions occurring circa 2500 B.C. following the innovation of kiln firing, resulting in more robust and long-lasting bricks. Throughout history, bricks have been utilized in significant architectural endeavors such as the Great Wall of China and Roman aqueducts, with the Industrial Revolution further enhancing their cost-effectiveness and manufacturing efficiency. Conversely, stone walls are renowned for their endurance, visual attractiveness, and historical importance. Although brick walls are favored for their cost-effectiveness and ease of construction, stone walls are chosen for their durability and aesthetic appeal. Furthermore, the study highlights the environmental concerns associated with brick manufacturing, specifically the emissions from kiln firing and transportation. By scrutinizing these facets, the paper aims to offer a comprehensive insight to assist in decision-making concerning the selection of suitable materials for construction undertakings. Both materials possess distinct advantages and drawbacks, rendering them suitable for specific circumstances and purposes. Key Words: brick, stone, concrete block, load bearing capacity
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Vulnerabilities and Threats in Large Language Models: Safeguarding Against Exploitation and Misuse Experimental Investigation of Leachate Treatment Using Low-Cost Adsorbents Exploring Vulnerabilities and Threats in Large Language Models: Safeguarding Against Exploitation and Misuse BANK TRANSACTION USING IRIS AND BIOMETRIC Experimental Investigation of Leachate Treatment Using Low-Cost Adsorbents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1