农业土地恢复的社会经济影响:系统审查

Q open Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1093/qopen/qoae022
Mandy Malan, Ezra Berkhout, Jan Duchoslav, Maarten Voors, Stefan Van Der Esch
{"title":"农业土地恢复的社会经济影响:系统审查","authors":"Mandy Malan, Ezra Berkhout, Jan Duchoslav, Maarten Voors, Stefan Van Der Esch","doi":"10.1093/qopen/qoae022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Land restoration programs are an increasingly popular tool to reduce degradation and increase livelihoods. This study aims to summarize the available evidence on the socioeconomic impacts of interventions aiming to promote land restoration or prevent land degradation, including agroforestry, conservation agriculture, integrated soil fertility management and soil and water conservation. Using a systematic approach to selecting and assessing the quality of relevant studies, this review reveals a paucity of evidence. We identify 29 causal studies, of which just six assess socioeconomic outcomes, only three studies were conducted outside of Africa and none assessed agroforestry. The 29 studies provide insights into 35 intervention-outcome combinations, of which 71% reveal a positive impact on the outcome studies. We discuss the implications for policy and research.","PeriodicalId":87350,"journal":{"name":"Q open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioeconomic impacts of land restoration in agriculture: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Mandy Malan, Ezra Berkhout, Jan Duchoslav, Maarten Voors, Stefan Van Der Esch\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/qopen/qoae022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Land restoration programs are an increasingly popular tool to reduce degradation and increase livelihoods. This study aims to summarize the available evidence on the socioeconomic impacts of interventions aiming to promote land restoration or prevent land degradation, including agroforestry, conservation agriculture, integrated soil fertility management and soil and water conservation. Using a systematic approach to selecting and assessing the quality of relevant studies, this review reveals a paucity of evidence. We identify 29 causal studies, of which just six assess socioeconomic outcomes, only three studies were conducted outside of Africa and none assessed agroforestry. The 29 studies provide insights into 35 intervention-outcome combinations, of which 71% reveal a positive impact on the outcome studies. We discuss the implications for policy and research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Q open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Q open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoae022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Q open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoae022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

土地恢复计划是一种日益流行的减少退化和增加生计的工具。本研究旨在总结有关旨在促进土地恢复或防止土地退化的干预措施(包括农林业、保护性农业、土壤肥力综合管理以及水土保持)的社会经济影响的现有证据。本综述采用系统方法选择相关研究并对其质量进行评估,结果表明证据极少。我们确定了 29 项因果关系研究,其中仅有 6 项研究对社会经济成果进行了评估,仅有 3 项研究是在非洲以外进行的,没有一项研究对农林业进行了评估。这 29 项研究提供了 35 种干预-结果组合的见解,其中 71% 的研究显示了对结果研究的积极影响。我们讨论了对政策和研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Socioeconomic impacts of land restoration in agriculture: a systematic review
Land restoration programs are an increasingly popular tool to reduce degradation and increase livelihoods. This study aims to summarize the available evidence on the socioeconomic impacts of interventions aiming to promote land restoration or prevent land degradation, including agroforestry, conservation agriculture, integrated soil fertility management and soil and water conservation. Using a systematic approach to selecting and assessing the quality of relevant studies, this review reveals a paucity of evidence. We identify 29 causal studies, of which just six assess socioeconomic outcomes, only three studies were conducted outside of Africa and none assessed agroforestry. The 29 studies provide insights into 35 intervention-outcome combinations, of which 71% reveal a positive impact on the outcome studies. We discuss the implications for policy and research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Who Can Predict Farmers’ Choices in Risky Gambles? Socioeconomic impacts of land restoration in agriculture: a systematic review Unpacking Stakeholder Perceptions on Challenges for Increasing Adoption of Solar- Powered Irrigation Systems in India: A Q Methodology Study Are lessons being learnt from the replication crisis or will the revolution devour its children? Open Q science from the editor's perspective Effects of institutional distrust on value estimates of stated preference surveys in developing countries: a choice experiment on conserving biodiversity within agricultural landscapes in a biodiversity hotspot
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1