搭配

Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1075/jhp.00073.mai
Christian Mair
{"title":"搭配","authors":"Christian Mair","doi":"10.1075/jhp.00073.mai","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Surveying a representative sample of studies of colloquialisation, a tendency for written norms to move closer to\n spoken usage, the chapter explores:\n \n \n \n the relationship between colloquialisation, operationalised in exclusively linguistic terms, and\n informalisation and democratisation, two processes primarily targeting wider sociocultural change, and\n \n \n complications arising when colloquialisation is extended beyond its original domain of application,\n standard written English of the ENL type.\n \n \n \n There are two major findings. Colloquialisation works less well in the study of ESL varieties than ENL ones. In\n addition, recent real-time analyses of change in spoken English suggest that the supposedly homogeneous baseline style of informal\n conversational English is more internally variable than is assumed in current work on colloquialisation.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colloquialisation\",\"authors\":\"Christian Mair\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhp.00073.mai\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Surveying a representative sample of studies of colloquialisation, a tendency for written norms to move closer to\\n spoken usage, the chapter explores:\\n \\n \\n \\n the relationship between colloquialisation, operationalised in exclusively linguistic terms, and\\n informalisation and democratisation, two processes primarily targeting wider sociocultural change, and\\n \\n \\n complications arising when colloquialisation is extended beyond its original domain of application,\\n standard written English of the ENL type.\\n \\n \\n \\n There are two major findings. Colloquialisation works less well in the study of ESL varieties than ENL ones. In\\n addition, recent real-time analyses of change in spoken English suggest that the supposedly homogeneous baseline style of informal\\n conversational English is more internally variable than is assumed in current work on colloquialisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"8 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00073.mai\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00073.mai","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

口语化是书面规范向口语用法靠拢的一种趋势,本章对口语化研究的代表性样本进行了调查,探讨了:口语化(完全从语言学角度进行操作)与非正式化和民主化(主要针对更广泛的社会文化变革的两个过程)之间的关系,以及当口语化扩展到其最初的应用领域(ENL 类型的标准书面英语)之外时产生的复杂情况。 有两个主要发现。口语化在研究 ESL 变体方面的效果不如 ENL 变体。此外,最近对英语口语变化的实时分析表明,非正式会话英语的所谓同质基线风格比当前口语化研究中假设的具有更多的内部可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Colloquialisation
Surveying a representative sample of studies of colloquialisation, a tendency for written norms to move closer to spoken usage, the chapter explores: the relationship between colloquialisation, operationalised in exclusively linguistic terms, and informalisation and democratisation, two processes primarily targeting wider sociocultural change, and complications arising when colloquialisation is extended beyond its original domain of application, standard written English of the ENL type. There are two major findings. Colloquialisation works less well in the study of ESL varieties than ENL ones. In addition, recent real-time analyses of change in spoken English suggest that the supposedly homogeneous baseline style of informal conversational English is more internally variable than is assumed in current work on colloquialisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1