有的放矢:如何将创新药物快速提供给需要者,并生成数据证明继续使用的合理性

Daniel Ollendorf, Chris Henshall, Marie Phillips, Patricia Synnott, Lloyd Sansom, Sean Tunis
{"title":"有的放矢:如何将创新药物快速提供给需要者,并生成数据证明继续使用的合理性","authors":"Daniel Ollendorf, Chris Henshall, Marie Phillips, Patricia Synnott, Lloyd Sansom, Sean Tunis","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Regulatory agencies worldwide have taken significant steps to expedite approval and market authorization of medicines based on their potential to address areas of significant unmet medical need and severe disease burden. But initial approval of such medicines is often accompanied by limited evidence of benefit, posing a conundrum for payers and health systems who may desire greater certainty of their value. This paper describes a system of “accelerated access” to manage these tensions and coordinate activities across stakeholders, based on discussions held at a multi-stakeholder convening in June 2023. We focus on 6 core, near-term actions that can be taken to improve the current system: clarifying criteria for expedited regulatory approval; enhancing stakeholder coordination; creating expedited pathways in payer and health technology assessment settings; developing joint regulatory/payer/HTA guidance on study design and data needs; linking pricing policy to data uncertainty; and improving patient and public understanding of the processes involved as well as the risks and benefits of the relevant medicines. Many of these actions will require additional resources and personnel, and some will necessitate unprecedented levels of coordination. Nevertheless, each action is designed to work with minimal adjustments to the current system rather than demanding an entirely new approach.","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Putting Meat on the Bone: How to Fast-Track Innovative Medicines to Those Who Need Them and Generate Data to Justify Continued Use\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Ollendorf, Chris Henshall, Marie Phillips, Patricia Synnott, Lloyd Sansom, Sean Tunis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxae095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Regulatory agencies worldwide have taken significant steps to expedite approval and market authorization of medicines based on their potential to address areas of significant unmet medical need and severe disease burden. But initial approval of such medicines is often accompanied by limited evidence of benefit, posing a conundrum for payers and health systems who may desire greater certainty of their value. This paper describes a system of “accelerated access” to manage these tensions and coordinate activities across stakeholders, based on discussions held at a multi-stakeholder convening in June 2023. We focus on 6 core, near-term actions that can be taken to improve the current system: clarifying criteria for expedited regulatory approval; enhancing stakeholder coordination; creating expedited pathways in payer and health technology assessment settings; developing joint regulatory/payer/HTA guidance on study design and data needs; linking pricing policy to data uncertainty; and improving patient and public understanding of the processes involved as well as the risks and benefits of the relevant medicines. Many of these actions will require additional resources and personnel, and some will necessitate unprecedented levels of coordination. Nevertheless, each action is designed to work with minimal adjustments to the current system rather than demanding an entirely new approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界各地的监管机构已采取重大措施,根据药品在满足重大未满足医疗需求和减轻严重疾病负担方面的潜力,加快药品的审批和上市。但是,此类药物在获得初步批准时,往往只有有限的获益证据,这给支付方和医疗系统带来了难题,因为他们可能希望这些药物的价值能够更加确定。本文根据 2023 年 6 月召开的多方利益相关者会议的讨论情况,介绍了一种 "加速获取 "系统,以管理这些矛盾并协调各利益相关者的活动。我们重点讨论了可用于改善当前系统的 6 项核心近期行动:明确加快监管审批的标准;加强利益相关者之间的协调;在支付方和卫生技术评估环境中创建加速路径;就研究设计和数据需求制定监管/支付方/卫生技术评估联合指南;将定价政策与数据不确定性联系起来;以及提高患者和公众对相关流程以及相关药物的风险和益处的理解。其中许多行动需要额外的资源和人员,有些行动需要前所未有的协调。尽管如此,每项行动都旨在对现行制度进行最小程度的调整,而不是要求采用全新的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Putting Meat on the Bone: How to Fast-Track Innovative Medicines to Those Who Need Them and Generate Data to Justify Continued Use
Regulatory agencies worldwide have taken significant steps to expedite approval and market authorization of medicines based on their potential to address areas of significant unmet medical need and severe disease burden. But initial approval of such medicines is often accompanied by limited evidence of benefit, posing a conundrum for payers and health systems who may desire greater certainty of their value. This paper describes a system of “accelerated access” to manage these tensions and coordinate activities across stakeholders, based on discussions held at a multi-stakeholder convening in June 2023. We focus on 6 core, near-term actions that can be taken to improve the current system: clarifying criteria for expedited regulatory approval; enhancing stakeholder coordination; creating expedited pathways in payer and health technology assessment settings; developing joint regulatory/payer/HTA guidance on study design and data needs; linking pricing policy to data uncertainty; and improving patient and public understanding of the processes involved as well as the risks and benefits of the relevant medicines. Many of these actions will require additional resources and personnel, and some will necessitate unprecedented levels of coordination. Nevertheless, each action is designed to work with minimal adjustments to the current system rather than demanding an entirely new approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: No Surprises Act independent dispute resolution outcomes for emergency services. All-cause nursing home mortality rates have remained above pre-pandemic levels after accounting for decline in occupancy. Charting new territory: the early lessons in integrating social determinant of health (SDOH) measures into practice. Factors impacting vaccine uptake among adult Medicaid beneficiaries: a systematic literature review. Measuring hospital inpatient Procedure Access Inequality in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1